Re: Packages FTBFS with Python 3.6
On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 12:18:47 AM WET Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi all, > We've recently tried to rebuild all Python packages with Python 3.6. > However, we currently have bunch of packages that simply fail to build. > > As the list contains >200 packages, it would be very helpful, if you > (package maintainers) could help us solve the issues, as we cannot go > one by one to investigate the issue. Fixed rpy (with a workaround for the moment). The problem is within R. R-core is already aware: https://bitbucket.org/rpy2/rpy2/issues/389/failed-to-compile-with-python-360-on-32 -- José Abílio ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of packages owning %{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__
On Monday, November 14, 2016 11:49:32 PM WET Athos Ribeiro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Guidelines say that %{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__ should not be owned
> by python packages because python3-libs already owns it [1]. That
> directory is actually owned by system-python-libs.
>
> While going through a package review, I realized that 50+ packages own
> %{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__. To avoid generating noise to packagers,
> I am just listing those packages here [2].
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Byte_compiling
>
> [2] - List of packages (rawhide) owning %{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__:
> pyparsing
Fixed.
--
José Abílio
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
