Re: Package naming for vkbasalt-cli
On 27-04-2023 15:03, Ian McInerney wrote: Albeit, I don't mind naming it python-vkbasalt-cli and providing a python3-vkbasalt-cli subpackage and a provides vkbasalt = ... I did the same for python-fvs, which looks to be primarily a library with an added utility [1] I had the same question when packaging up git-revise (a Python-based program that is a git extension, so it is an executable script), and the advice I received was if the package is on PyPi, then it is probably best to use a python-* name to make it discoverable ( https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QYWJ7UUEBSSQ5QAPJSVDWPLM5KOYRZW5/). I decided to name the source RPM python-git-revise (instead of just git-revise), and then included a subpackage with the shortname so that it was still searchable/installable easily. Yes. I'm leaning towards the same approach. Only vkbasalt-cli is not on PyPI, yet. -- Sandro ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Package naming for vkbasalt-cli
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:27 PM Sandro wrote: > On 27-04-2023 10:48, Petr Viktorin wrote: > > That sounds good. You could also do it the other way around. > > I think that depends on the main purpose of the package. Is it primarily > an app or primarily a library. In this case it seems the utility is > prevalent. > > Albeit, I don't mind naming it python-vkbasalt-cli and providing a > python3-vkbasalt-cli subpackage and a provides vkbasalt = ... > > I did the same for python-fvs, which looks to be primarily a library > with an added utility [1] > I had the same question when packaging up git-revise (a Python-based program that is a git extension, so it is an executable script), and the advice I received was if the package is on PyPi, then it is probably best to use a python-* name to make it discoverable ( https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QYWJ7UUEBSSQ5QAPJSVDWPLM5KOYRZW5/). I decided to name the source RPM python-git-revise (instead of just git-revise), and then included a subpackage with the shortname so that it was still searchable/installable easily. -Ian > > > In this case, it looks like `vkbasalt-cli` is developed independently of > > vkbasalt itself, is that right? If there's a chance that an “official” > > vkbasalt CLI appears in the future, consider using only > > `python-vkbasalt-cli`, to prevent future confusion. > > But I guess if that ever happened, the fact that vkbasalt-cli provides > > `/usr/bin/vkbasalt` would be a bigger issue. > > Well, I submitted the package for review [2] and have been told that > vkbasalt not being published on PyPI is an issue wrt naming parity. > So, I filed a bug requesting publication on PyPI [3], but I haven't > heard back from upstream, yet. If upstream remains unresponsive, I would > need to either publish it myself or get the name reserved as described > in PyPI parity [4]. > > AFAICT, the package is developed independently of vkbasalt and > specifically for Bottles. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061 > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188653 > [3] https://gitlab.com/TheEvilSkeleton/vkbasalt-cli/-/issues/10 > [4] > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_pypi_parity > > -- Sandro > ___ > python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Package naming for vkbasalt-cli
On 27-04-2023 10:48, Petr Viktorin wrote: That sounds good. You could also do it the other way around. I think that depends on the main purpose of the package. Is it primarily an app or primarily a library. In this case it seems the utility is prevalent. Albeit, I don't mind naming it python-vkbasalt-cli and providing a python3-vkbasalt-cli subpackage and a provides vkbasalt = ... I did the same for python-fvs, which looks to be primarily a library with an added utility [1] In this case, it looks like `vkbasalt-cli` is developed independently of vkbasalt itself, is that right? If there's a chance that an “official” vkbasalt CLI appears in the future, consider using only `python-vkbasalt-cli`, to prevent future confusion. But I guess if that ever happened, the fact that vkbasalt-cli provides `/usr/bin/vkbasalt` would be a bigger issue. Well, I submitted the package for review [2] and have been told that vkbasalt not being published on PyPI is an issue wrt naming parity. So, I filed a bug requesting publication on PyPI [3], but I haven't heard back from upstream, yet. If upstream remains unresponsive, I would need to either publish it myself or get the name reserved as described in PyPI parity [4]. AFAICT, the package is developed independently of vkbasalt and specifically for Bottles. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188653 [3] https://gitlab.com/TheEvilSkeleton/vkbasalt-cli/-/issues/10 [4] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_pypi_parity -- Sandro ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Package naming for vkbasalt-cli
Hi! On 21. 04. 23 12:46, Sandro wrote: Hi, I need to package vkbasalt-cli [1] as a dependency for Bottles. Bottles will use the Python library, but vkbasalt-cli also provides a command for independent/direct usage. My plan is to name the Fedora package 'vkbasalt-cli' in line with upstream and add a virtual provide for 'python3-vkbasalt-cli'. Could someone confirm that this is the right approach for vkbasalt-cli? Thanks in advance, That sounds good. You could also do it the other way around. In this case, it looks like `vkbasalt-cli` is developed independently of vkbasalt itself, is that right? If there's a chance that an “official” vkbasalt CLI appears in the future, consider using only `python-vkbasalt-cli`, to prevent future confusion. But I guess if that ever happened, the fact that vkbasalt-cli provides `/usr/bin/vkbasalt` would be a bigger issue. ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Package naming for vkbasalt-cli
On 21-04-2023 12:46, Sandro wrote: I need to package vkbasalt-cli [1] as a dependency for Bottles. Bottles will use the Python library, but vkbasalt-cli also provides a command for independent/direct usage. And here is the missing link: [1] https://gitlab.com/TheEvilSkeleton/vkbasalt-cli ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
