Re: f-string syntax deficiency?
Roel Schroeven wrote:
Op 6/06/2023 om 16:08 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 00:06, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> The following f-string does not parse and gives syntax error on 3.11.3:
>
> f'thruput/{"user" if opt.return else "cell"} vs. elevation\n'
>
> However this expression, which is similar does parse correctly:
>
> f'thruput/{"user" if True else "cell"} vs. elevation\n'
>
> I don't see any workaround. Parenthesizing doesn't help:
> f'thruput/{"user" if (opt.return) else "cell"} vs. elevation\n'
>
> also gives a syntax error
Is this a problem with the f-string, or with the expression
opt.return? That's a keyword.
'return' being a keyowrd is definitely going to be the problem.
Neal, I assume you're using 'opt.return' also outside of that f-string.
Does that work? How did you manage to do that? I tried to make a simple
class with an attribute called 'return', but that already fails with a
syntax error.
Just for fun, here's a class which has any attribute you like, including
`return`:
```
class AnyAttr:
def __getattr__(self, name):
return f'This is the value of the <{name}> attribute'
```
The usual "dot" notation to access the attributes works for arbitrary
attributes, but not for `return` because, as mentioned, that's a keyword:
```
>>> aa = AnyAttr()
>>> aa.myattribute
'This is the value of the attribute'
>>> aa.random
'This is the value of the attribute'
>>> aa.return
File "", line 1
aa.return
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
```
If you really do have an instance with a `return` attribute (perhaps
because it does fun things with `__getattr__`), you can access it if
necessary using `getattr`:
```
>>> getattr(aa, 'return')
'This is the value of the attribute'
```
You can even access attributes with spaces and other usually-invalid
characters:
```
>>> getattr(aa, 'This really is an attribute name!')
'This is the value of the attribute'
```
Using `getattr` to access the value, Neal's f-string can be made to work:
```
>>> f'thruput/{"user" if getattr(aa, "return") else "cell"} vs.
elevation\n'
'thruput/user vs. elevation\n'
```
But if you have control over the implementation of that `opt` object,
it's probably better to give the attribute a different name which is a
valid identifier. PEP-8 suggests a convention of using a single
trailing underscore (e.g. `return_`) to avoid conflicts with keywords,
if there's no better name.
Perhaps `opt` is the arguments returned by `argparse.ArgumentParser` and
you want the command-line option to be `--return`. In that case, see
the `dest` argument to `add_argument()` which can specify a different
name for the attribute used in code (it's almost like they thought about
this type of problem ;o)). If it's from `optparse`, that has a similar
argument, but `optparse` is deprecated so consider updating to `argparse`.
(Recently there has been an effort to provide clearer and more useful
error messages; this seems to be a case where there is still room for
improvement: "SyntaxError: invalid syntax" doesn't immediately remind me
of that fact that 'return' is a keyword and therefor can't be used as an
attribute.)
--
Mark.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: f-string syntax deficiency?
Op 6/06/2023 om 16:48 schreef Chris Angelico via Python-list: On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 00:42, Roel Schroeven wrote: > (Recently there has been an effort to provide clearer and more useful > error messages; this seems to be a case where there is still room for > improvement: "SyntaxError: invalid syntax" doesn't immediately remind me > of that fact that 'return' is a keyword and therefor can't be used as an > attribute.) That's true, but depending on exactly how you're seeing the error, it might highlight the exact part that's a problem: >>> opt.return File "", line 1 opt.return ^^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax It's extremely hard to guess what the programmer might have intended in these situations, as the error might not be the word "return" but perhaps the punctuation (maybe that was supposed to be a semicolon, or something). So Python does the best it can, and points out that the "return" keyword in this context doesn't make syntactic sense. Ah yes, good point. -- "Don't Panic." -- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: f-string syntax deficiency?
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 00:42, Roel Schroeven wrote: > (Recently there has been an effort to provide clearer and more useful > error messages; this seems to be a case where there is still room for > improvement: "SyntaxError: invalid syntax" doesn't immediately remind me > of that fact that 'return' is a keyword and therefor can't be used as an > attribute.) That's true, but depending on exactly how you're seeing the error, it might highlight the exact part that's a problem: >>> opt.return File "", line 1 opt.return ^^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax It's extremely hard to guess what the programmer might have intended in these situations, as the error might not be the word "return" but perhaps the punctuation (maybe that was supposed to be a semicolon, or something). So Python does the best it can, and points out that the "return" keyword in this context doesn't make syntactic sense. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: f-string syntax deficiency?
Op 6/06/2023 om 16:41 schreef Roel Schroeven: 'return' being a keyowrd is definitely going to be the problem. *keyword -- "Don't Panic." -- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: f-string syntax deficiency?
Op 6/06/2023 om 16:08 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 00:06, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> The following f-string does not parse and gives syntax error on 3.11.3:
>
> f'thruput/{"user" if opt.return else "cell"} vs. elevation\n'
>
> However this expression, which is similar does parse correctly:
>
> f'thruput/{"user" if True else "cell"} vs. elevation\n'
>
> I don't see any workaround. Parenthesizing doesn't help:
> f'thruput/{"user" if (opt.return) else "cell"} vs. elevation\n'
>
> also gives a syntax error
Is this a problem with the f-string, or with the expression
opt.return? That's a keyword.
'return' being a keyowrd is definitely going to be the problem.
Neal, I assume you're using 'opt.return' also outside of that f-string.
Does that work? How did you manage to do that? I tried to make a simple
class with an attribute called 'return', but that already fails with a
syntax error.
(Recently there has been an effort to provide clearer and more useful
error messages; this seems to be a case where there is still room for
improvement: "SyntaxError: invalid syntax" doesn't immediately remind me
of that fact that 'return' is a keyword and therefor can't be used as an
attribute.)
--
"Don't Panic."
-- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: f-string syntax deficiency?
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 00:06, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> The following f-string does not parse and gives syntax error on 3.11.3:
>
> f'thruput/{"user" if opt.return else "cell"} vs. elevation\n'
>
> However this expression, which is similar does parse correctly:
>
> f'thruput/{"user" if True else "cell"} vs. elevation\n'
>
> I don't see any workaround. Parenthesizing doesn't help:
> f'thruput/{"user" if (opt.return) else "cell"} vs. elevation\n'
>
> also gives a syntax error
Is this a problem with the f-string, or with the expression
opt.return? That's a keyword.
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
f-string syntax deficiency?
The following f-string does not parse and gives syntax error on 3.11.3:
f'thruput/{"user" if opt.return else "cell"} vs. elevation\n'
However this expression, which is similar does parse correctly:
f'thruput/{"user" if True else "cell"} vs. elevation\n'
I don't see any workaround. Parenthesizing doesn't help:
f'thruput/{"user" if (opt.return) else "cell"} vs. elevation\n'
also gives a syntax error
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
