Ah - this makes more sense.
Did the implementation of 'fp' file-like object change in 2.4.1 and it
no longer has a read()?
Andre.
Anthony Botrel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the call fp.read(8192) the function read() gets 2 arguments : and
> <8192>
>
> Member functions implicitely get their object as first argument, this
> is why you get this error. So you have 2 possibilities : either read()
> doesn't take an argument anymore, or read() is not a member of fp.
>
> Anthony B.
>
> On 8/18/05, Andrey Smirnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I am getting the following traceback after upgrading my app to Python
>>2.4.1. It's telling me that there is an error in Parser.py. It tells
>>me that 'fp.read(8192)' is given 2 arguments, but it is clearly not
>>true. Does anybody know what's going on here?
>>
>>Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/opt/etext/lib/python2.4/site-packages/etext/enqueue.py", line
>>252, in work
>>worker(e.linkval, info)
>> File "/opt/etext/bin/etreceive", line 30, in worker
>>result = decode.searchfile(f)
>> File "/opt/etext/lib/python2.4/site-packages/etext/decode.py", line
>>43, in searchfile
>>return Email(f)
>> File "/opt/etext/lib/python2.4/site-packages/etext/decode.py", line
>>510, in __init__
>>self.child.append(Email(mf))
>> File "/opt/etext/lib/python2.4/site-packages/etext/decode.py", line
>>404, in __init__
>>msg = Parser().parse(f)
>> File "/opt/etext/lib/python2.4/email/Parser.py", line 65, in parse
>>data = fp.read(8192)
>>TypeError: read() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Andre.
>>
>>--
>>
>>--
>>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>>
--
_/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ Andre Smirnov
_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/ CNS - DSE
_/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ 303 272-8352 / x78352
_/ _/_/ _/ _/_/Mailstop: UBRM05-203
_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/ _/
500 Eldorado boulevard
Broomfield, CO 80021
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
