Re: [Python-Dev] Mercurial migration: help needed

2009-08-18 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 13:32, Mark Hammond wrote:
> I can make time, somewhat spasmodically, starting fairly soon.  Might I
> suggest that as a first task I can resurrect my old stale patch, and you can
> arrange to install win32text locally and start experimenting with how mixed
> line-endings can work for you.  Once we are all playing in the same ballpark
> I think we should be able to make good progress.

Sounds good to me.

Cheers,

Dirkjan
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: [Python-Dev] Mercurial migration: help needed

2009-08-18 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:12, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> In this thread, I'd like to collect things that ought to be done
> but where Dirkjan has indicated that he would prefer if somebody else
> did it.

I think the most important item here is currently the win32text stuff.
Mark Hammond said he would work on this; Mark, when do you have time
for this? Then I could set apart some time for it as well.

Have stalled a bit on the fine-grained branch processing, hope to move
that forward tomorrow.

Cheers,

Dirkjan
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 384: Defining a Stable ABI

2009-05-17 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:07 AM, "Martin v. Löwis"  wrote:
> I fail to see the relationship, so: no effect that I can see.
>
> Why do you think that optimization efforts could be related to
> the PEP 384 proposal?

It would seem to me that optimizations are likely to require data
structure changes, for exactly the kind of core data structures that
you're talking about locking down. But that's just a high-level view,
I might be wrong.

Cheers,

Dirkjan
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 384: Defining a Stable ABI

2009-05-17 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:54 PM, "Martin v. Löwis"  wrote:
> Excluded Functions
> --
>
> Functions declared in the following header files are not part
> of the ABI:
> - cellobject.h
> - classobject.h
> - code.h
> - frameobject.h
> - funcobject.h
> - genobject.h
> - pyarena.h
> - pydebug.h
> - symtable.h
> - token.h
> - traceback.h

What kind of effect does this have on optimization efforts, for
example all the stuff done by Antoine Pitrou over the last few months,
and the first few results from unladen? Will it mean we won't get to
the good optimizations until 4.0? Or does it just mean unladen swallow
takes longer to come back to trunk (until 4.0) and every extension
author who wants to be compatible with it will basically have the same
burden as now?

Cheers,

Dirkjan
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Creating dict from keys and values

2005-05-29 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
Hi there,

I'm looking for an intuitive way of creating a dict from what the 
dict.keys() and dict.values() will return (two lists).

Currently, I'm using this code:

> d = {}
> for i in range(len(data)):
>   d[header[i]] = data[i]

But this feels kind of inelegant. So: is there a better way?

TIA,

Dirkjan
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Tibia 0.1 DOM-based website editor

2004-12-10 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
Stick the single tibia.tba file on your webserver (assuming Python is
installed) and you're off and editing files in the same folder or below.
Admins can edit any element; non-admins can edit any element for which
admins give them permission.
- Stuck in /var/www/localhost/cgi-bin/
- Changed permissions to 755
- Renamed to tibia.cgi
... 500 Internal Server Error.
I don't have a lot of experience with CGI, though, so any help would be 
welcome.

Regards,
Dirkjan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list