Re: python to mssql
"Robert Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Brane wrote: > can someone please give me some info regarding subject > >http://sourceforge.net/projects/mysql-python > >Ask a broad question... > > >Robert Brewer Robert, the question was about 'mssql', not 'mysql'. As for mssql, a search on google will give you the following as the first result: http://pymssql.sourceforge.net/ with others on the page that include: http://www.object-craft.com.au/projects/mssql/ http://www.egenix.com/files/python/eGenix-mx-Extensions.html Don't be lazy, Brane. Your first point of reference should _always_ be google. The fact that "I'm Feeling Lucky" points you to pymssql shows that you didn't do any research before posting here. -Noah -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Bad Interpreter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I have seen some previous messages about such a problem. I have this > problem but it is not clear what the solution really was. > > I am running FC2, python 2.3.3 > > the script i have sock.py runs if i say something like : > > python sock.py > > but ./sock.py results in a :bad interpreter error > how do i troubleshoot something like this? > > regards > What does the first line of your script look like? It needs to be pointing to the python interpreter binary, which you can locate with: which python (on the command line). Check and make sure it is. If it is and you are still getting this problem, post some code and the complete error. HTH. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Developing Commercial Applications in Python
"It's me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Richards Noah (IFR LIT MET)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Begging your pardon, but a better resource would be the brochure available > > (http://www.pti-us.com/PTI/company/brochures/PSSE.pdf). It appears that > the > > program was probably (originally) written in C/C++ (using MFC for the > GUI), > > and now employs Python for adding modules and scripting support. Very > > interesting stuff :) > > > > > > It was actually developed in Fortran some 35 years ago. Then migrated to > F77. Then added a C/C++ layer to sit ontop. Then converted to API based. > Then added a Python layer on top. > > The only thing unfortunate is that they went with MFC on the newest version. > Yuck! > Hahaha, sounds like a party to me. And they didn't even throw in a layer of Lisp for good effort? Too bad, if you ask me :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Developing Commercial Applications in Python
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hello All, > > I am trying to convince my client to use Python in his new product. He > > is worried about the license issues. Can somebody there to point me any > > good commercial applications developed using python ?. The licence > > clearly says Python can be used for commercial applications. Is there > > any other implications like that of GPL to make the source open ? > > Thanks for any help. > > eeykay > > "It's me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Shaw-PTI (www.pti-us.com) uses Python in their software. See: > http://www.pti-us.com/pti/news/index.cfm and search "2004 PSS/E User Group > Meeting" > Begging your pardon, but a better resource would be the brochure available (http://www.pti-us.com/PTI/company/brochures/PSSE.pdf). It appears that the program was probably (originally) written in C/C++ (using MFC for the GUI), and now employs Python for adding modules and scripting support. Very interesting stuff :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: BASIC vs Python
"Christos TZOTZIOY Georgiou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 01:43:56 -0600, rumours say that Mike Meyer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> might have written: > > >Assembler was better - at least you had recursion with > >assembler. > > You had recursion with BASIC --what you probably mean is that you had no > stacked parameters (unless you imitated that with using an indexed > array). > > 90 rem recursion > 100 print "beautiful colours" > 110 gosub 100 I think he means that you had no recursive function calls in BASIC. I suppose, to most of us, "recursion" doesn't mean "doing things more than once," since by that definition, iteration is also recursion. Recursion generally means some type of self reference, like in functional languages, where the simplest recursion is base case/recurring step. BASIC didn't do this, without a bit of unsightly hackery. Then again, I don't believe that it was really a concern at the time, so I don't suppose its too important of an issue :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
