Re: package rating system for the Cheese Shop
On May 12, 2:49 pm, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is there a package rating system for the Cheese Shop, like how Perl > > has cpanratings (http://cpanratings.perl.org/)? > > I don't know CPAN, but maybe this is what you're looking for: > > http://www.cheeserater.com/ > > ? > > STeVe Thanks for the link STeVe. Yes, this is the sort of thing I was looking for. Looks like there's no way to actually leave comments on a package though; just a (+) or (-) rating. No way to say something like, "I like x, y, and z about this package, but n, m, and especially o need to get fixed" though. One strength of cpanratings is you can leave those comments. A well- written review comment, like "I used this package, and here's how it worked out ... If you need , you might try instead of this one." is much more valuable than a thumbs-up or thumbs-down. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
package rating system for the Cheese Shop
Is there a package rating system for the Cheese Shop, like how Perl has cpanratings (http://cpanratings.perl.org/)? Do you think it would be useful? I see that we already have Cheesecake (http://pycheesecake.org/) for rating a package's kwalitee (like Perl's CPANTS). But browsing the Cheese Shop, I don't see a way to view or sort by Cheesecake rating... How can I see the kwalitee ratings of the packages at the Cheese Shop? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
name capitalization of built-in types, True, and False
I see that naming conventions are such that classes usually get named CamelCase. So why are the built-in types named all lowercase (like list, dict, set, bool, etc.)? And names for instances of classes are usually written in lowercase, like foo in ``foo = CamelCase()``. So why are True and False (instances of bool) capitalized? Shouldn't they be "true" and "false"? Same goes for None. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
