Re: A macro editor

2005-10-25 Thread Fabio Zadrozny
Hi Jaume,

Pydev (http://pydev.sf.net) is an eclipse plugin that does 
code-completion for jython, so, it might be worth taking a look at it...

Cheers,

Fabio


jau wrote:

Hello mates.

I'm part of a big project's developer team. We are writting an 
application in Java and we are planning to add scripting functionality 
to it. What we exactly are planning is to give a kind of tool that would 
allow our users to write their own scripts to perform their special 
operations. Something like VBA does in several comercial applications. 
But, as we are GPL we have to use a close to GPL licensed-like language.

My teammates and I were talking about to use one of Python, Ruby or 
Groovy. But, we haven't decided which to use.

What seems to be easier is to use Python, you know.. because of the 
Jython thing. But, it is probably a mistake to take Jython without a 
extensive analysis of the all possibilities.

 From my point of view, the best choice will be those that allow the 
average user getting results as fast as possible rather than the power 
of the language itself. At the end, what we will write is a gateway to 
access to our application's Java API through the scripts written by our 
users.

In this sense, I'd like to ask if someone knows if any of these 
languages have a Java implementation that supports code auto-complete 
and class navigation or any kind of functionality that would ease and 
speed up the user's learning curve and productivity.

In other words, is it possible to have a small and lightly intelligent 
workbench window (a mini-Eclipse for example) for our future macro 
editor within our application?

I promise that if get some info I'll publish it here as soon I have it.

Thanks for your time!
Jaume
  



-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: A macro editor

2005-10-21 Thread bruno modulix
Tom Anderson wrote:
 On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
 
 So - _I_ think the better user-experience comes froma well-working
 easy to use REPL to quickly give the scripts a try.
 
 
 I'd agree with that. Which is better, a difficult language with lots of
 fancy tools to help you write it, or an easy language?
 
 I don't know Groovy, but having looked at some examples, it looks like
 jave with a makeover, which, compared to python, sounds like a difficult
 language.
 
 As for python vs ruby, i can't really offer any insights on the
 languages themselves. Personally, i'd go for python, but that's because
 i know python and not ruby.

I know a bit of Ruby, and my *very humble* opinion is that Python is
easier for beginners - *but* I'm probably (certainly) biased here, so
you'd better find some non-programmers  having learn Ruby in a similar
context and ask them about this (with the buzzword around Rails, you
find such people easily...)

-- 
bruno desthuilliers
python -c print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


A macro editor

2005-10-20 Thread jau
Hello mates.

I'm part of a big project's developer team. We are writting an 
application in Java and we are planning to add scripting functionality 
to it. What we exactly are planning is to give a kind of tool that would 
allow our users to write their own scripts to perform their special 
operations. Something like VBA does in several comercial applications. 
But, as we are GPL we have to use a close to GPL licensed-like language.

My teammates and I were talking about to use one of Python, Ruby or 
Groovy. But, we haven't decided which to use.

What seems to be easier is to use Python, you know.. because of the 
Jython thing. But, it is probably a mistake to take Jython without a 
extensive analysis of the all possibilities.

 From my point of view, the best choice will be those that allow the 
average user getting results as fast as possible rather than the power 
of the language itself. At the end, what we will write is a gateway to 
access to our application's Java API through the scripts written by our 
users.

In this sense, I'd like to ask if someone knows if any of these 
languages have a Java implementation that supports code auto-complete 
and class navigation or any kind of functionality that would ease and 
speed up the user's learning curve and productivity.

In other words, is it possible to have a small and lightly intelligent 
workbench window (a mini-Eclipse for example) for our future macro 
editor within our application?

I promise that if get some info I'll publish it here as soon I have it.

Thanks for your time!
Jaume
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: A macro editor

2005-10-20 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
 My teammates and I were talking about to use one of Python, Ruby or 
 Groovy. But, we haven't decided which to use.
 
 What seems to be easier is to use Python, you know.. because of the 
 Jython thing. But, it is probably a mistake to take Jython without a 
 extensive analysis of the all possibilities.

There seems to exist a Ruby java port, conveniently called jruby. 
Additionally, you might consider beanshell.

 
  From my point of view, the best choice will be those that allow the 
 average user getting results as fast as possible rather than the power 
 of the language itself. At the end, what we will write is a gateway to 
 access to our application's Java API through the scripts written by our 
 users.
 
 In this sense, I'd like to ask if someone knows if any of these 
 languages have a Java implementation that supports code auto-complete 
 and class navigation or any kind of functionality that would ease and 
 speed up the user's learning curve and productivity.
 
 In other words, is it possible to have a small and lightly intelligent 
 workbench window (a mini-Eclipse for example) for our future macro 
 editor within our application?

I doubt that will be possible. A language that has no type-declarations 
- that is true for ruby  python (regardless of their respective VM 
implementations) - can't possibly deliver that feature. And it looks as 
if the same is true for groovy.

The only thing I can imagine is that you try and recognize the 
gateways to your API-model and provide calltips for names that are 
bound to values from that model.

E.g. if you have a module called core that contains an 
application-object that represents your application, you could try and 
identify code like this:

app = core.applikation
app.here comes a calltip


However, if the user does fancy tricks like this:

setattr(self, app, core.application)
self.app.here you don't know s**t

So - _I_ think the better user-experience comes froma well-working easy 
to use REPL to quickly give the scripts a try.

Regards,

Diez
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: A macro editor

2005-10-20 Thread Tom Anderson
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:

 So - _I_ think the better user-experience comes froma well-working easy 
 to use REPL to quickly give the scripts a try.

I'd agree with that. Which is better, a difficult language with lots of 
fancy tools to help you write it, or an easy language?

I don't know Groovy, but having looked at some examples, it looks like 
jave with a makeover, which, compared to python, sounds like a difficult 
language.

As for python vs ruby, i can't really offer any insights on the languages 
themselves. Personally, i'd go for python, but that's because i know 
python and not ruby.

tom

-- 
NOW ALL ASS-KICKING UNTIL THE END
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list