Fool Python class with imaginary members (serious guru stuff inside)
I'm trying to create a class that would lie to the user that a member is in some cases a simple variable and in other cases a class. The nature of the member would depend on call syntax like so: 1. x = obj.member #x becomes the simple value contained in member 2. x = obj.member.another_member #x becomes the simple value contained in first member's another_member. So the first method detects that we only need a simple value and returns that. The second method sees that we need member as a class and returns that. Note that simple type could mean anything, from int to bitmap image. I have determined that this is possible if I sacrifice the final member reference to the __call__ override using function-call syntax: 1. x = obj.member(). The call syntax returns the simple value and the other returns the class. It is also possible if I override the __xxxitem__ methods to simulate a dictionary. However, I would like to use the true member access syntax if possible. So, is it possible? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Fool Python class with imaginary members (serious guru stuff inside)
On 9/20/2012 9:52 AM, Jure Erznožnik wrote: I'm trying to create a class that would lie to the user that a member is in some cases a simple variable and in other cases a class. The nature of the member would depend on call syntax like so: 1. x = obj.member #x becomes the simple value contained in member 2. x = obj.member.another_member #x becomes the simple value contained in first member's another_member. x.y.z is parsed and executed as (x.y).z, so you are asking if the attribute-getter can know what will be done with the object it returns. Assuming CPython, you would have to write something that searches the Python code before compilation, the ast during compilation, or the bytecode after compilation. Much easier would be to define a union class that is a simple type with attributes and return that in the first lookup. class AttrInt(int): def __getattr__(self, name): return 'attribute' y = AttrInt(3) print(y, y.a) ### 3 attribute If x.y returns an AttrInt, it will act like an int for most purposes, while x.y.z will return whatever AttrInt.__getattr__ does and the temporary AttrInt y disappears. -- Terry Jan Reedy -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Fool Python class with imaginary members (serious guru stuff inside)
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:52:07 -0700, Jure Erznožnik wrote: I'm trying to create a class that would lie to the user that a member is in some cases a simple variable and in other cases a class. The nature of the member would depend on call syntax like so: 1. x = obj.member #x becomes the simple value contained in member 2. x = obj.member.another_member #x becomes the simple value contained in first member's another_member. Why do you hate your users so much that you want to cause them enormous difficulty with perfectly reasonable code like this? tmp = obj.member x = tmp.another_member So the first method detects that we only need a simple value and returns that. Fortunately that is impossible without nasty bytecode or AST hacks. Thank the stars that Python doesn't allow anything as badly designed as this! -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
