Re: My python interpreter became mad !

[castironpi]

On Mar 25, 7:45 pm, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Furkan Kuru incorrigibly top-posted:
>
> > Ok, you're right.
>
> > but I did not give it a chance "not trying python interpreter in another
> > directory"
>
> I don't understand that sentence.
>
> > so if we assume the problem exists in every directory, it has something
> > to do with  pythonpath.
>
> Why would/should we assume that?

Process of enumeration.

> > you can try setting pythonpath to some directory and put a re.py there
> > and try from any directory starting your interpreter and importing re.
>
> and achieve the same result: importing the bogus re. What's your point?

I'm not so sure that dispute burdens of proof are resolved all that
virtuously (life isn't fair; fair is good).  What are newsgroups like
in the monarchies?  Ever feel you're typing on auto-pilot?  It's not
like you vote on me staying.  However, the things I've said about
myself aren't written intepretation-strict, thence there must be some
distinction between interpretations, or between resident attitudes for
me?

Perhaps my fault for overinvesting hope in the newsgroups.  You're not
a best friend to me!  .  If you look like your pets, do we
look like computers?  Restrictions are different for justice: my only
analytically (or never) outweighs my threshold.

By the process of cognition, we ascribe malice (how probabilistically-
malicious is it) to people (as danger to objects?), but the ideal
realm (kingdom Logos), but revising estimates is expensive.

Do visual mirrors make a round-trip error?

Is there emotionally such thing as a computer?  They are certainly
deep, but perhaps only axiomatically; people aren't made of binary.
How far to the nearest indefinite precision computer?  Any pull around
here?  Someone have a thesis on wake-detection in a parallel system?
Can we 'black-box' people?  ("Are you a black box?")  What kind of
accuracy is there in uniform media?  Can we 'black-box' groups?

Wakes and patterned perturbations can be modeled in feature-sets,
abitrary feature collisions not fully particle.  I'd be more
interested in a feature specialty that facilitates to transmit waves,
and a sum-of-waveform native.  Is there a recursive expression of the
taylor expansion of e^x, by the way?

Interface and deface.  Honest and true?  Can you just buffer?

Beliefs might settle wrong, and it's hard to change them: huge
machine, right nail.  Can a spider swarm simulate a macro operation
(building a building), either given a power source or carrying
"lifeform batteries"?  Operator would need interface: thought to
operation: fast enough - idle loop cost: can't be governing every
small bug (once again, features over particles), the machines would
need overall/level/summary operations, read memories.  But you can get
a couple microvolts and a memory cell on a 2-micron spider, and a
radio-static but sees a medium, speed-of-propogation, limitation.
Just think outside the case.

How organized is the newsgroup?  Can I buy a long non-commutative
associative (time order (resort)) record?  It's not.  (That's a tongue
thing, right?)  A place to come to: a place to sit at energy level.
(New you vs. same me here too.)  2-D primitives suck on serial input.
I'd almost rather decode a video of hands.  Would a computer mind
learning?

You could by a perceptive-order code.  What the world needs is a few
good spacers.  I have to think; leave silent, and return broadcasting.

How's yours suck + what's the monkey on your back?  Multi-type time
people for sale, American dollar.  Anyone up for a little register-
base broadcasting?  It's a broad.
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: My python interpreter became mad !

[Gabriel Genellina]

En Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:14:39 -0300, Furkan Kuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
escribió:

> I did not think he/she/anyone would ask the question in the main thread
> without trying the interpreter a few times starting it from different
> directories.

Perhaps *you* would do that, but that is far beyond a newbie would do.  
Most newbies are lost enough to not even be able to ask the question in  
the first place. If the book doesn't tell anything about the directory,  
why should the starting directory be relevant? Why should I care not to  
use a reserved name to save my script? Where is that list of reserved  
names?

-- 
Gabriel Genellina

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: My python interpreter became mad !

[Furkan Kuru]

On 3/26/08, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > but I did not give it a chance "not trying python interpreter in another
> > directory"
>
> I don't understand that sentence.


ok let me explain:
I did not think he/she/anyone would ask the question in the main thread
without trying the interpreter a few times starting it from different
directories.



> so if we assume the problem exists in every directory, it has something
> > to do with  pythonpath.
>
> Why would/should we assume that?



Because I, as an individual, would not ask this question without running
interpreter from different directories.
and I would look whether I created a py file with the exact same name of a
core module.

And this "simple" mistake had been pointed out by other guys.
The only other reason that came to my mind was this pythonpath.
( and I was dealing with it recently: you may have take a look at the thread
titled 'embedded pyton pythonpath' any answer is appreciated :p  )


> > you can try setting pythonpath to some directory and put a re.py there
> > and try from any directory starting your interpreter and importing re.
>
> and achieve the same result: importing the bogus re. What's your point?



yeah same result: bogus re. but from a different way: not user's re but
created by someone else in another directory.



>
> >
> >
> > On 3/25/08, *John Machin* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > Furkan Kuru top-posted:
> >  > Most probably X-Spam added itself to your path.
> >
> > What is "X-Spam"? Added itself to Benjamin's path [not mine] in such
> a
> > fashion that it is invoked when one does "import re"?
> >
> >  > you should look at your PATH and PYTHONPATH environment
> variables.
> >
> > Most *IM*probably. Read the traceback:
> > """
> >  >  >File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
> >  >  >  m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
> >  >  > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
> > """
> >
> > This is a classic case of a script (which does not guard against
> side
> > effects (like spewing out gibberish) when imported instead of being
> > executed) being given the same name as a Python-included module and
> > being executed in the current directory and hence ends up importing
> > itself.
> >
> >  >
> >  > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, John Machin
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >  > >>
> wrote:
> >  >
> >  > On Mar 25, 10:05 pm, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> >  > >> wrote:
> >  >  > Yes, my python interpreter seems to became mad ; or may be
> > it's
> >  > me ! :)
> >  >  >
> >  >  > I'm trying to use re module to match text with regular
> >  > expression. In a
> >  >  > first time, all works right. But since yesterday, I have a
> > very
> >  > strange
> >  >  > behaviour :
> >  >  >
> >  >  > $ python2.4
> >  >  > Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr  5 2007, 20:11:18)
> >  >  > [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on
> linux2
> >  >  > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more
> >  > information.
> >  >  >  >>> import re
> >  >  > X-Spam-Flag: YES
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >  >  > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >  >  >File "", line 1, in ?
> >  >  >File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
> >  >  >  m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
> >  >  > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
> >  >  >  >>>
> >  >  >
> >  >  > What's the hell ?? I'm just importing the re module.
> >  >
> >  > No you're not importing *the* re module. You're importing
> *an* re
> >  > module, the first one that is found. In this case: your own
> > re.py.
> >  > Rename it.
> >  >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Furkan Kuru
>
>


-- 
Furkan Kuru
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: My python interpreter became mad !

[John Machin]

Furkan Kuru incorrigibly top-posted:
> Ok, you're right.
>  
> but I did not give it a chance "not trying python interpreter in another 
> directory"

I don't understand that sentence.


> so if we assume the problem exists in every directory, it has something 
> to do with  pythonpath.

Why would/should we assume that?


> you can try setting pythonpath to some directory and put a re.py there 
> and try from any directory starting your interpreter and importing re.

and achieve the same result: importing the bogus re. What's your point?

> 
> 
>  
> On 3/25/08, *John Machin* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > wrote:
> 
> Furkan Kuru top-posted:
>  > Most probably X-Spam added itself to your path.
> 
> What is "X-Spam"? Added itself to Benjamin's path [not mine] in such a
> fashion that it is invoked when one does "import re"?
> 
>  > you should look at your PATH and PYTHONPATH environment variables.
> 
> Most *IM*probably. Read the traceback:
> """
>  >  >File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
>  >  >  m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
>  >  > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
> """
> 
> This is a classic case of a script (which does not guard against side
> effects (like spewing out gibberish) when imported instead of being
> executed) being given the same name as a Python-included module and
> being executed in the current directory and hence ends up importing
> itself.
> 
>  >
>  > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, John Machin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>  > >> wrote:
>  >
>  > On Mar 25, 10:05 pm, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>  > >> wrote:
>  >  > Yes, my python interpreter seems to became mad ; or may be
> it's
>  > me ! :)
>  >  >
>  >  > I'm trying to use re module to match text with regular
>  > expression. In a
>  >  > first time, all works right. But since yesterday, I have a
> very
>  > strange
>  >  > behaviour :
>  >  >
>  >  > $ python2.4
>  >  > Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr  5 2007, 20:11:18)
>  >  > [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
>  >  > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more
>  > information.
>  >  >  >>> import re
>  >  > X-Spam-Flag: YES
> 
> [snip]
> 
>  >  > Traceback (most recent call last):
>  >  >File "", line 1, in ?
>  >  >File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
>  >  >  m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
>  >  > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
>  >  >  >>>
>  >  >
>  >  > What's the hell ?? I'm just importing the re module.
>  >
>  > No you're not importing *the* re module. You're importing *an* re
>  > module, the first one that is found. In this case: your own
> re.py.
>  > Rename it.
>  >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Furkan Kuru

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: My python interpreter became mad !

[Furkan Kuru]

Ok, you're right.

but I did not give it a chance "not trying python interpreter in another
directory"
so if we assume the problem exists in every directory, it has something to
do with  pythonpath.
you can try setting pythonpath to some directory and put a re.py there and
try from any directory starting your interpreter and importing re.



On 3/25/08, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Furkan Kuru top-posted:
> > Most probably X-Spam added itself to your path.
>
> What is "X-Spam"? Added itself to Benjamin's path [not mine] in such a
> fashion that it is invoked when one does "import re"?
>
> > you should look at your PATH and PYTHONPATH environment variables.
>
> Most *IM*probably. Read the traceback:
> """
> >  >File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
> >  >  m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
> >  > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
> """
>
> This is a classic case of a script (which does not guard against side
> effects (like spewing out gibberish) when imported instead of being
> executed) being given the same name as a Python-included module and
> being executed in the current directory and hence ends up importing
> itself.
>
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 25, 10:05 pm, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> >  > Yes, my python interpreter seems to became mad ; or may be it's
> > me ! :)
> >  >
> >  > I'm trying to use re module to match text with regular
> > expression. In a
> >  > first time, all works right. But since yesterday, I have a very
> > strange
> >  > behaviour :
> >  >
> >  > $ python2.4
> >  > Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr  5 2007, 20:11:18)
> >  > [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
> >  > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more
> > information.
> >  >  >>> import re
> >  > X-Spam-Flag: YES
>
> [snip]
>
> >  > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >  >File "", line 1, in ?
> >  >File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
> >  >  m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
> >  > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
> >  >  >>>
> >  >
> >  > What's the hell ?? I'm just importing the re module.
> >
> > No you're not importing *the* re module. You're importing *an* re
> > module, the first one that is found. In this case: your own re.py.
> > Rename it.
> >
>
>


-- 
Furkan Kuru
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: My python interpreter became mad !

[John Machin]

Furkan Kuru top-posted:
> Most probably X-Spam added itself to your path.

What is "X-Spam"? Added itself to Benjamin's path [not mine] in such a 
fashion that it is invoked when one does "import re"?

> you should look at your PATH and PYTHONPATH environment variables.

Most *IM*probably. Read the traceback:
"""
 >  >File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
 >  >  m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
 >  > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
"""

This is a classic case of a script (which does not guard against side 
effects (like spewing out gibberish) when imported instead of being 
executed) being given the same name as a Python-included module and 
being executed in the current directory and hence ends up importing itself.

> 
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > wrote:
> 
> On Mar 25, 10:05 pm, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>  > Yes, my python interpreter seems to became mad ; or may be it's
> me ! :)
>  >
>  > I'm trying to use re module to match text with regular
> expression. In a
>  > first time, all works right. But since yesterday, I have a very
> strange
>  > behaviour :
>  >
>  > $ python2.4
>  > Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr  5 2007, 20:11:18)
>  > [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
>  > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more
> information.
>  >  >>> import re
>  > X-Spam-Flag: YES

[snip]

>  > Traceback (most recent call last):
>  >File "", line 1, in ?
>  >File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
>  >  m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
>  > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
>  >  >>>
>  >
>  > What's the hell ?? I'm just importing the re module.
> 
> No you're not importing *the* re module. You're importing *an* re
> module, the first one that is found. In this case: your own re.py.
> Rename it.
> 

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: My python interpreter became mad !

[Benjamin Watine]

John Machin a écrit :
> On Mar 25, 10:05 pm, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, my python interpreter seems to became mad ; or may be it's me ! :)
>>
>> I'm trying to use re module to match text with regular expression. In a
>> first time, all works right. But since yesterday, I have a very strange
>> behaviour :
>>
>> $ python2.4
>> Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr  5 2007, 20:11:18)
>> [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
>> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>  >>> import re
>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on w3hosting.org
>> X-Spam-Level: **
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=22.2 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_HB_SEP,
>>  MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJECT,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,
>>
>> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,TO_CC_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
>>
>> URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,
>>  URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=failed version=3.1.7-deb
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>File "", line 1, in ?
>>File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
>>  m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
>> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
>>  >>>
>>
>> What's the hell ?? I'm just importing the re module.
> 
> No you're not importing *the* re module. You're importing *an* re
> module, the first one that is found. In this case: your own re.py.
> Rename it.
> 

Oh... yes, that's it ; I have a file named re.py !
Ouch, sorry for this stupid question, and thank you for this evident 
answer. I didn't knew that it was possible to import a module this way...

Thank you for the fast answer !

Ben
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: My python interpreter became mad !

[Furkan Kuru]

Most probably X-Spam added itself to your path.
you should look at your PATH and PYTHONPATH environment variables.

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mar 25, 10:05 pm, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, my python interpreter seems to became mad ; or may be it's me ! :)
> >
> > I'm trying to use re module to match text with regular expression. In a
> > first time, all works right. But since yesterday, I have a very strange
> > behaviour :
> >
> > $ python2.4
> > Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr  5 2007, 20:11:18)
> > [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
> > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> >  >>> import re
> > X-Spam-Flag: YES
> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on
> w3hosting.org
> > X-Spam-Level: **
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=22.2 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_HB_SEP,
> >  MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJECT,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,
> >
> > RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,TO_CC_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
> >
> > URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,
> >  URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=failed version=3.1.7-deb
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >File "", line 1, in ?
> >File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
> >  m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
> > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
> >  >>>
> >
> > What's the hell ?? I'm just importing the re module.
>
> No you're not importing *the* re module. You're importing *an* re
> module, the first one that is found. In this case: your own re.py.
> Rename it.
>
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>



-- 
Furkan Kuru
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: My python interpreter became mad !

[John Machin]

On Mar 25, 10:05 pm, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, my python interpreter seems to became mad ; or may be it's me ! :)
>
> I'm trying to use re module to match text with regular expression. In a
> first time, all works right. But since yesterday, I have a very strange
> behaviour :
>
> $ python2.4
> Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr  5 2007, 20:11:18)
> [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>  >>> import re
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on w3hosting.org
> X-Spam-Level: **
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=22.2 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_HB_SEP,
>  MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJECT,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,
>
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,TO_CC_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
>
> URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,
>  URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=failed version=3.1.7-deb
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>File "", line 1, in ?
>File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
>  m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
>  >>>
>
> What's the hell ?? I'm just importing the re module.

No you're not importing *the* re module. You're importing *an* re
module, the first one that is found. In this case: your own re.py.
Rename it.

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: My python interpreter became mad !

[alex23]

On Mar 25, 9:05 pm, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to use re module to match text with regular expression. In a
> first time, all works right. But since yesterday, I have a very strange
> behaviour :

The following line in the traceback shows you're not using the default
python module:

>File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?

Were you using the interpreter in the /etc/postfix directory? The re
module there seems to be shadowing the site package.

Hope this helps.

- alex23
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: My python interpreter became mad !

[Tim Golden]

Benjamin Watine wrote:
> Yes, my python interpreter seems to became mad ; or may be it's me ! :)
> 
> I'm trying to use re module to match text with regular expression. In a 
> first time, all works right. But since yesterday, I have a very strange 
> behaviour :
> 
> $ python2.4
> Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr  5 2007, 20:11:18)
> [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>  >>> import re
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on w3hosting.org
> X-Spam-Level: **
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=22.2 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_HB_SEP,
>  MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJECT,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,
>  
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,TO_CC_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
>  
> URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,
>  URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=failed version=3.1.7-deb
> 
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>File "", line 1, in ?
>File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
>  m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
>  >>>

Extremely likely that, in the course of testing some
re technique, you've created a module in this directory
called "re.py". When you import re, you're actually
importing your own module.

TJG
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

My python interpreter became mad !

[Benjamin Watine]

Yes, my python interpreter seems to became mad ; or may be it's me ! :)

I'm trying to use re module to match text with regular expression. In a 
first time, all works right. But since yesterday, I have a very strange 
behaviour :

$ python2.4
Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr  5 2007, 20:11:18)
[GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
 >>> import re
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on w3hosting.org
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=22.2 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_HB_SEP,
 MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJECT,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,
 
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,TO_CC_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
 
URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,
 URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=failed version=3.1.7-deb

Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "", line 1, in ?
   File "/etc/postfix/re.py", line 19, in ?
 m = re.match('(Spam)', mail)
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'match'
 >>>

What's the hell ?? I'm just importing the re module. The code showed, is 
a previous test code, that seems to be buffered and that make an error.
Each call to re module generate that error.

How can I workaround ? Is there is a way to flush or restart python 
interpreter. Is it a bug in python ??

Thanks !

Ben

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list