Python metaclass and UML
How should I represent a Python metaclass on an UML class diagram? I know how to represent composition, aggregation and inheritance. But not sure about metaclasses. What kind of arrow or line should I use between a class and its metaclass? Is there a standard for this? Thanks, Laszlo -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Python metaclass and UML
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Laszlo Nagy gand...@shopzeus.com wrote: How should I represent a Python metaclass on an UML class diagram? I know how to represent composition, aggregation and inheritance. But not sure about metaclasses. What kind of arrow or line should I use between a class and its metaclass? Is there a standard for this? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1483273/how-to-draw-a-classs-metaclass-in-uml -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Python metaclass and UML
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Laszlo Nagy gand...@shopzeus.com wrote: How should I represent a Python metaclass on an UML class diagram? I know how to represent composition, aggregation and inheritance. But not sure about metaclasses. What kind of arrow or line should I use between a class and its metaclass? Is there a standard for this? IHMO (but others may have other opinions) the same way you'd represent a decorated function. Metaclasses IHMO have the same effect as a decorated function - modifying another classes's behavior. cheers Jaes -- -- James Mills -- -- Problems are solved by method -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
