Re: Python3 Web Framework
On 2010-12-30 23:47:17 -0800, Aman said: Hey all... I just started with Python, and I chose Python3 because it seemed a subtle choice as compared to doing Pthon 2.x now and then porting to Python3.x later... I plan to start with Web Development soon... I wanted to know what all web frameworks are available for Python3... I heard the Django is still not compatible with 3.x... Any idea guys? Python 3 has a number of issues with web development thus far: WSGI[1] (PEP 333) isn't directly compatible with Python 3, for one. However, PEP is looking good[2] for making web framework code compatible with Python 3 without needing too much modification. I'm not sure what the state of affairs is for PEP or Python 3 compatible frameworks, however. (CherryPy -might- be compatible, I can not recall.) Basically this means that using Python 3, you'll be roughing it for a while. On the other hand, I'm working on PEP 444[3] (WSGI 2) and have a highly performant web server compatible with Python 3 available[4] that is compatible with PEP 444 as published on Python.org[5] (master branch) and with my rewritten draft (draft branch, to be merged when my rewrite is complete and published on Python.org). Another developer and I have been working on the WebOb-style helper exceptions and wrappers, from which a microframework can quickly spawn. The HTTP server has 100% coverage (master) and near-100% coverage (draft) and compatibility with Python 2.6+ and 3.1+. Have a great day, - Alice. [1] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0333/ [2] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-/ [3] http://bit.ly/e7rtI6 [4] http://bit.ly/fLfamO [5] http://bit.ly/gmT17O -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Python3 Web Framework
On 12/31/2010 3:47 AM, Alice Bevan–McGregor wrote: Python 3 has a number of issues with web development thus far: I believe some will be improved or even solved in 3.2. -- Terry Jan Reedy -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Python3 Web Framework
Am 31.12.2010 08:47, schrieb Aman: Hey all... I just started with Python, and I chose Python3 because it seemed a subtle choice as compared to doing Pthon 2.x now and then porting to Python3.x later... I plan to start with Web Development soon... I wanted to know what all web frameworks are available for Python3... I heard the Django is still not compatible with 3.x... Any idea guys? You could try my port of Django to Py3k: https://bitbucket.org/loewis/django-3k Regards, Martin -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Python3 Web Framework
On 2010-12-31 02:20:47 -0800, Terry Reedy said: I believe some will be improved or even solved in 3.2. Evidence to back this statement up would be appreciated. ;) - Alice. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Python3 Web Framework
On 2010-12-31 17:24:56 -0500, Alice Bevan–McGregor said: On 2010-12-31 02:20:47 -0800, Terry Reedy said: I believe some will be improved or even solved in 3.2. Evidence to back this statement up would be appreciated. ;) - Alice. - wsgiref now implements and validates PEP , rather than an experimental extension of PEP 333. (Note: earlier versions of Python 3.x may have incorrectly validated some non-compliant applications as WSGI compliant; if your app validates with Python 3.2b1+, but not on this version, it is likely the case that your app was not compliant.) That is from the changes file...so they are working to fix it all. HTH -- Robert -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Python3 Web Framework
Hey all... I just started with Python, and I chose Python3 because it seemed a subtle choice as compared to doing Pthon 2.x now and then porting to Python3.x later... I plan to start with Web Development soon... I wanted to know what all web frameworks are available for Python3... I heard the Django is still not compatible with 3.x... Any idea guys? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
