Re: Question on importing and function defs

2008-03-02 Thread castironpi
On Mar 2, 11:44 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TC wrote:
> > On Mar 2, 11:37 am, Gary Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> TC wrote:
> >>> I have a problem.  Here's a simplified version of what I'm doing:
> >>> I have functions a() and b() in a module called 'mod'.  b() calls a().
> >>> So now, I have this program:
> >>> from mod import *
> >>> def a():
> >>>     blahblah
> >>> b()
> >>> The problem being, b() is calling the a() that's in mod, not the new
> >>> a() that I want to replace it.  (Both a()'s have identical function
> >>> headers, in case that matters.)  How can I fix this?
> >>> Thanks for any help.
> >> Since b calls mod.a, you could replace mod.a with your new a.  Like
> >> this:  (Warning, this could be considered bad style because it will
> >> confuse anyone who examines the mod module in an attempt to understand
> >> you code.)
>
> >>   import mod
>
> >>   def replacement_a():
> >>     ...
>
> >>   mod.a = replacement_a
>
> >>   ...
>
> >> Or another option.  Define b to take, as a parameter, the "a" function
> >> to call.
>
> >> In mod:
>
> >>   def a():
> >>    ...
>
> >>   def b(fn=a):  # to set the default a to call
> >>     ...
>
> >> And you main program:
>
> >>   from mod import *
>
> >>   def my_a():
> >>     ...
>
> >>   b(my_a)
>
> >> Hope that helps
>
> >> Gary Herron
>
> > Thanks for the tips, but no luck.  This is for a homework assignment,
> > so there are a couple of requirements, namely that I can't touch
> > 'mod', and I have to do 'from mod import *' as opposed to 'import
> > mod'.
>
> > So the first method you suggested won't work as written, since the mod
> > namespace doesn't exist.  I tried a = replacement_a, but b() is still
> > calling mod's version of a() for some reason.  And because I can't
> > touch mod, I can't use your second suggestion.
>
> > In case I somehow oversimplified, here's the actual relevant code, in
> > 'mod' (actually called 'search').  The first fn is what I've been
> > calling a(), the second is b().
>
> > (lots of stuff...)
>
> > def compare_searchers(problems, header,
> > searchers=[breadth_first_tree_search,
> >                       breadth_first_graph_search,
> > depth_first_graph_search,
> >                       iterative_deepening_search,
> > depth_limited_search,
> >                       astar_search]):
> >     def do(searcher, problem):
> >         p = InstrumentedProblem(problem)
> >         searcher(p)
> >         return p
> >     table = [[name(s)] + [do(s, p) for p in problems] for s in
> > searchers]
> >     print_table(table, header)
>
> > def compare_graph_searchers():
> >     compare_searchers(problems=[GraphProblem('A', 'B', romania),
> >                                 GraphProblem('O', 'N', romania),
> >                                 GraphProblem('Q', 'WA', australia)],
> >             header=['Searcher', 'Romania(A,B)', 'Romania(O, N)',
> > 'Australia'])
>
> > That's the end of the 'search' file.  And here's my program, which
> > defines an identical compare_searchers() with an added print
> > statement.  That statement isn't showing up.
>
> > from search import *
>
> > def compare_searchers(problems, header,
> > searchers=[breadth_first_tree_search,
> >                       breadth_first_graph_search,
> > depth_first_graph_search,
> >                       iterative_deepening_search,
> > depth_limited_search,
> >                       astar_search, best_first_graph_search]):
> >     def do(searcher, problem):
> >         p = InstrumentedProblem(problem)
> >         searcher(p)
> >         return p
> >     table = [[name(s)] + [do(s, p) for p in problems] for s in
> > searchers]
> >     print 'test'
> >     print_table(table, header)
>
> > compare_graph_searchers()
>
> Since you've admitted it's for homework, here are a couple of hints.
>
> 1. The b() function is *always* going to try and resolve its references
> in the namespace it was defined in;
>
> 2. The technique you need is most likely known as "monkey patching".
> When you say "I can't touch mod", that may mean "the source of mod must
> remain unchanged", which is subtly different. Google is your friend ...
>
> Good luck with your assignment.
>
> regards
>   Steve
> --
> Steve Holden        +1 571 484 6266   +1 800 494 3119
> Holden Web LLC              http://www.holdenweb.com/- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

You can use 'settrace' to intervene.  You might be able to delete the
'a'.
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Question on importing and function defs

2008-03-02 Thread Steve Holden
TC wrote:
> On Mar 2, 11:37 am, Gary Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> TC wrote:
>>> I have a problem.  Here's a simplified version of what I'm doing:
>>> I have functions a() and b() in a module called 'mod'.  b() calls a().
>>> So now, I have this program:
>>> from mod import *
>>> def a():
>>> blahblah
>>> b()
>>> The problem being, b() is calling the a() that's in mod, not the new
>>> a() that I want to replace it.  (Both a()'s have identical function
>>> headers, in case that matters.)  How can I fix this?
>>> Thanks for any help.
>> Since b calls mod.a, you could replace mod.a with your new a.  Like
>> this:  (Warning, this could be considered bad style because it will
>> confuse anyone who examines the mod module in an attempt to understand
>> you code.)
>>
>>   import mod
>>
>>   def replacement_a():
>> ...
>>
>>   mod.a = replacement_a
>>
>>   ...
>>
>> Or another option.  Define b to take, as a parameter, the "a" function
>> to call.
>>
>> In mod:
>>
>>   def a():
>>...
>>
>>   def b(fn=a):  # to set the default a to call
>> ...
>>
>> And you main program:
>>
>>   from mod import *
>>
>>   def my_a():
>> ...
>>
>>   b(my_a)
>>
>> Hope that helps
>>
>> Gary Herron
> 
> Thanks for the tips, but no luck.  This is for a homework assignment,
> so there are a couple of requirements, namely that I can't touch
> 'mod', and I have to do 'from mod import *' as opposed to 'import
> mod'.
> 
> So the first method you suggested won't work as written, since the mod
> namespace doesn't exist.  I tried a = replacement_a, but b() is still
> calling mod's version of a() for some reason.  And because I can't
> touch mod, I can't use your second suggestion.
> 
> In case I somehow oversimplified, here's the actual relevant code, in
> 'mod' (actually called 'search').  The first fn is what I've been
> calling a(), the second is b().
> 
> (lots of stuff...)
> 
> def compare_searchers(problems, header,
> searchers=[breadth_first_tree_search,
>   breadth_first_graph_search,
> depth_first_graph_search,
>   iterative_deepening_search,
> depth_limited_search,
>   astar_search]):
> def do(searcher, problem):
> p = InstrumentedProblem(problem)
> searcher(p)
> return p
> table = [[name(s)] + [do(s, p) for p in problems] for s in
> searchers]
> print_table(table, header)
> 
> def compare_graph_searchers():
> compare_searchers(problems=[GraphProblem('A', 'B', romania),
> GraphProblem('O', 'N', romania),
> GraphProblem('Q', 'WA', australia)],
> header=['Searcher', 'Romania(A,B)', 'Romania(O, N)',
> 'Australia'])
> 
> 
> That's the end of the 'search' file.  And here's my program, which
> defines an identical compare_searchers() with an added print
> statement.  That statement isn't showing up.
> 
> from search import *
> 
> def compare_searchers(problems, header,
> searchers=[breadth_first_tree_search,
>   breadth_first_graph_search,
> depth_first_graph_search,
>   iterative_deepening_search,
> depth_limited_search,
>   astar_search, best_first_graph_search]):
> def do(searcher, problem):
> p = InstrumentedProblem(problem)
> searcher(p)
> return p
> table = [[name(s)] + [do(s, p) for p in problems] for s in
> searchers]
> print 'test'
> print_table(table, header)
> 
> compare_graph_searchers()

Since you've admitted it's for homework, here are a couple of hints.

1. The b() function is *always* going to try and resolve its references 
in the namespace it was defined in;

2. The technique you need is most likely known as "monkey patching". 
When you say "I can't touch mod", that may mean "the source of mod must 
remain unchanged", which is subtly different. Google is your friend ...

Good luck with your assignment.

regards
  Steve
-- 
Steve Holden+1 571 484 6266   +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC  http://www.holdenweb.com/

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Question on importing and function defs

2008-03-02 Thread TC
On Mar 2, 11:37 am, Gary Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TC wrote:
> > I have a problem.  Here's a simplified version of what I'm doing:
>
> > I have functions a() and b() in a module called 'mod'.  b() calls a().
>
> > So now, I have this program:
>
> > from mod import *
>
> > def a():
> > blahblah
>
> > b()
>
> > The problem being, b() is calling the a() that's in mod, not the new
> > a() that I want to replace it.  (Both a()'s have identical function
> > headers, in case that matters.)  How can I fix this?
>
> > Thanks for any help.
>
> Since b calls mod.a, you could replace mod.a with your new a.  Like
> this:  (Warning, this could be considered bad style because it will
> confuse anyone who examines the mod module in an attempt to understand
> you code.)
>
>   import mod
>
>   def replacement_a():
> ...
>
>   mod.a = replacement_a
>
>   ...
>
> Or another option.  Define b to take, as a parameter, the "a" function
> to call.
>
> In mod:
>
>   def a():
>...
>
>   def b(fn=a):  # to set the default a to call
> ...
>
> And you main program:
>
>   from mod import *
>
>   def my_a():
> ...
>
>   b(my_a)
>
> Hope that helps
>
> Gary Herron

Thanks for the tips, but no luck.  This is for a homework assignment,
so there are a couple of requirements, namely that I can't touch
'mod', and I have to do 'from mod import *' as opposed to 'import
mod'.

So the first method you suggested won't work as written, since the mod
namespace doesn't exist.  I tried a = replacement_a, but b() is still
calling mod's version of a() for some reason.  And because I can't
touch mod, I can't use your second suggestion.

In case I somehow oversimplified, here's the actual relevant code, in
'mod' (actually called 'search').  The first fn is what I've been
calling a(), the second is b().

(lots of stuff...)

def compare_searchers(problems, header,
searchers=[breadth_first_tree_search,
  breadth_first_graph_search,
depth_first_graph_search,
  iterative_deepening_search,
depth_limited_search,
  astar_search]):
def do(searcher, problem):
p = InstrumentedProblem(problem)
searcher(p)
return p
table = [[name(s)] + [do(s, p) for p in problems] for s in
searchers]
print_table(table, header)

def compare_graph_searchers():
compare_searchers(problems=[GraphProblem('A', 'B', romania),
GraphProblem('O', 'N', romania),
GraphProblem('Q', 'WA', australia)],
header=['Searcher', 'Romania(A,B)', 'Romania(O, N)',
'Australia'])


That's the end of the 'search' file.  And here's my program, which
defines an identical compare_searchers() with an added print
statement.  That statement isn't showing up.

from search import *

def compare_searchers(problems, header,
searchers=[breadth_first_tree_search,
  breadth_first_graph_search,
depth_first_graph_search,
  iterative_deepening_search,
depth_limited_search,
  astar_search, best_first_graph_search]):
def do(searcher, problem):
p = InstrumentedProblem(problem)
searcher(p)
return p
table = [[name(s)] + [do(s, p) for p in problems] for s in
searchers]
print 'test'
print_table(table, header)

compare_graph_searchers()
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Question on importing and function defs

2008-03-02 Thread Gary Herron
TC wrote:
> I have a problem.  Here's a simplified version of what I'm doing:
>
> I have functions a() and b() in a module called 'mod'.  b() calls a().
>
> So now, I have this program:
>
> from mod import *
>
> def a():
> blahblah
>
> b()
>
>
> The problem being, b() is calling the a() that's in mod, not the new
> a() that I want to replace it.  (Both a()'s have identical function
> headers, in case that matters.)  How can I fix this?
>
> Thanks for any help.
>   

Since b calls mod.a, you could replace mod.a with your new a.  Like 
this:  (Warning, this could be considered bad style because it will 
confuse anyone who examines the mod module in an attempt to understand 
you code.)


  import mod

  def replacement_a():
...

  mod.a = replacement_a

  ...


Or another option.  Define b to take, as a parameter, the "a" function 
to call.

In mod:

  def a():
   ...

  def b(fn=a):  # to set the default a to call
...

And you main program:

  from mod import *

  def my_a():
...

  b(my_a)


Hope that helps

Gary Herron

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Question on importing and function defs

2008-03-02 Thread Nick Miller
TC wrote:
> I have a problem.  Here's a simplified version of what I'm doing:
>
> I have functions a() and b() in a module called 'mod'.  b() calls a().
>
> So now, I have this program:
>
> from mod import *
>
> def a():
> blahblah
>
> b()
>
>
> The problem being, b() is calling the a() that's in mod, not the new
> a() that I want to replace it.  (Both a()'s have identical function
> headers, in case that matters.)  How can I fix this?
>
> Thanks for any help.
>   

The only problem I could see with this is a local function issue. 
Meaning that even when you write the new a() function in the main source 
file, b() doesn't know it exists because it's relying on it's own 
"local" a() in the module. I'm also new to using Python so I that's all 
I can think would be the problem.

Nick

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Question on importing and function defs

2008-03-02 Thread TC
I have a problem.  Here's a simplified version of what I'm doing:

I have functions a() and b() in a module called 'mod'.  b() calls a().

So now, I have this program:

from mod import *

def a():
blahblah

b()


The problem being, b() is calling the a() that's in mod, not the new
a() that I want to replace it.  (Both a()'s have identical function
headers, in case that matters.)  How can I fix this?

Thanks for any help.
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list