Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-03-16 Thread astrobe

[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :

 rickman wrote:
  The original post seems to be missing, but my answer to the title
  question is, No, Forth is not real.

 Not for real, for Integer.

No, it's for me and you (well, perhaps more for you than for me).
But 4IM is forever mine :)

 Amicalement,
  Astrobe

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-24 Thread rickman

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 rickman wrote:
  The original post seems to be missing, but my answer to the title
  question is, No, Forth is not real.
 
 Not for real, for Integer.

:-)

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-20 Thread rickman
Cameron Laird wrote:
 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Steven D'Aprano  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   .
   .
   .
 on the web for each language. By comparison, even Forth gives 13 million
 plus hits, and who uses Forth?
   .
   .
   .
 The programmers of, among other things, the FedEx bar-code reader,
 the Sun boot loader, and parts of the Space Shuttle.

The original post seems to be missing, but my answer to the title
question is, No, Forth is not real.

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-20 Thread fox
rickman wrote:
 The original post seems to be missing, but my answer to the title
 question is, No, Forth is not real.

Not for real, for Integer.

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-12 Thread Roy Smith
Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I love Forth. I'm no good at thinking at that low count-the-bytes level,
 but if I was, I'd much prefer to use Forth than C or assembly. I've got a
 bunch of Forth books here, and when I'm bored I read them for
 entertainment, and dream. I love the fact that Forth is still in use. But
 I'm under no illusions that there are millions of Forth developers getting
 paid to write in Forth.

If you like Forth, take a look at PostScript.  Most people think of 
PostScript as a print file format and don't realize it's a real programming 
language. Variables, functions, loops, if statements, and all that good 
stuff.  The syntax is very Forth-like.
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-12 Thread skip

Roy If you like Forth, take a look at PostScript.  

I miss NeWS... :-(

Skip
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-12 Thread Daniel Ciesinger
Steven D'Aprano schrieb:
 On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:08:02 +, Cameron Laird wrote:
 
 
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Steven D'Aprano  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

on the web for each language. By comparison, even Forth gives 13 million
plus hits, and who uses Forth?

13m hits for forth as in set forth, firth of forth etc.
.
The programmers of, among other things, the FedEx bar-code reader,
the Sun boot loader, and parts of the Space Shuttle.
 
 You missed Apple's boot loader.

And LOTs of small tools, scripts, analyzers written in Forth, because it 
has such a nice evaluate, beating e.g. JavaScript evaluate by a 
speed advantage around 1000 or more...
You can feed that with a datastream such as

123.50 MONITOR Rx 03 DC 0A 0D
124.00 COMMS   Tx 01 A5

...and convert such stuff into XML, SVG or any representation you like.
Very useful (and fast) e.g. for automotive applications.

 I love Forth. I'm no good at thinking at that low count-the-bytes level,
 but if I was, I'd much prefer to use Forth than C or assembly. I've got a
 bunch of Forth books here, and when I'm bored I read them for
 entertainment, and dream. I love the fact that Forth is still in use. But
 I'm under no illusions that there are millions of Forth developers getting
 paid to write in Forth.

Maybe a few hundred - and then some thousands who write their utils in 
Forth during their paid time...

Daniel

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-12 Thread Elizabeth D Rather
Cameron Laird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Steven D'Aprano  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 .
 .
 .
on the web for each language. By comparison, even Forth gives 13 million
plus hits, and who uses Forth?
 .
 .
 .
 The programmers of, among other things, the FedEx bar-code reader,
 the Sun boot loader, and parts of the Space Shuttle.

We have several thousand customers, although we don't hear from them enough 
to know how active they are.  Most of them are doing embedded systems (such 
as the FedEx package tracker), although there are also quite a few doing 
Windows apps.

A lot of our embedded work is for aerospace and government customers, plus a 
number in the private sector.  All the DirecTV uplink antennas are 
controlled by one of our systems made by VertexRSI, 
http://www.tripointglobal.com/vertexrsi.html.  Another really neat customer 
is Sunrise Systems, http://www.sunrisesystems.com/index.htm.  They make 
moving displays, and are working on one for one of the rebuilt World Trade 
Center bldgs, one to be installed in Switzerland next month, and something 
for Disney World.

Open Firmware has already been mentioned, and I should add that IBM's 
high-end servers also use it.  I teach Forth courses there once or twice a 
year, and have trained a couple hundred engineers in IBM alone.

You can get more info on our web site www.forth.com, including a link to a 
paper presenting a history of Forth.

Cheers,
Elizabeth

-- 
==
Elizabeth D. Rather   (US  Canada)   800-55-FORTH
FORTH Inc. +1 310-491-3356
5155 W. Rosecrans Ave. #1018  Fax: +1 310-978-9454
Hawthorne, CA 90250
http://www.forth.com

Forth-based products and Services for real-time
applications since 1973.
== 

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list