Re: Writing to stdout and a log file

2005-04-20 Thread Wolfram Kraus
Mike wrote:
I would like my 'print' statements to send its output to the user's
screen and a log file.
This is my initial attempt:
class StdoutLog(file):
def __init__(self, stdout, name='/tmp/stdout.log',
mode='w',bufsize=-1):
super(StdoutLog, self).__init__(name,mode,bufsize)
self.stdout = stdout
def write(self, data):
self.stdout.write(data)
What happens when you do a self.stdout.flush() here?
self.write(data)
import sys
sys.stdout = StdoutLog(sys.stdout)
print 'STDOUT', sys.stdout
When the program is run the string is written to the log file but
nothing appears on my screen. Where's the screen output?
It looks like the superclass's write() method is getting called instead
of the StdoutLog instance's write() method.
The python documentation says 'print' should write to
sys.stdout.write() but that doesn't seem to be happening.
Any idea what's going one? 
Or ideas on how to debug this?

Thanks, Mike
I had the same problem (writing to file and stdout with print) and my 
solution was *not* to subclass file and instead add a 
self.outfile=file(...) to the constructor.

HTH,
Wolfram
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Writing to stdout and a log file

2005-04-20 Thread Mike
flushing stdout has no effect.

I've got an implementation that does not subclass file. It's not as
nice but it works.

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Writing to stdout and a log file

2005-04-20 Thread Michael Hoffman
Mike wrote:
I should've mentioned I want StdoutLog to subclass the 'file' type
because I need all the file attributes available.
You might use a surrogate pattern. Here's one I use for this kind of 
situation, where I want to subclass but that can't be done for some reason.

class SurrogateNotInitedError(exceptions.AttributeError):
pass
class Surrogate(object):
def __init__(self, data):
self._data = data
def __getattr__(self, name):
if name == _data:
raise SurrogateNotInitedError, name
else:
try:
return getattr(self._data, name)
except SurrogateNotInitedError:
raise SurrogateNotInitedError, name
I'll leave it as an exercise to the reader to make this work when 
self._data is actually a list of objects instead of a single object. 
You'll obviously need special logic for different methods, like write(), 
since for some of them you will want to call every object in self._data, 
and others only a single object.
--
Michael Hoffman
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Writing to stdout and a log file

2005-04-20 Thread Mike
Perfect. This is what Ill use. Thanks! Mike

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Writing to stdout and a log file

2005-04-19 Thread Jeff Epler
This variation works:
#
class Tee:
def __init__(self, *args):
self.files = args

def write(self, data):
for f in self.files:
result = f.write(data)
return result

def writelines(self, seq):
for i in seq: self.write(i)

import sys
sys.stdout = Tee(sys.stdout, open(/tmp/stdout.log, w))

print 'STDOUT', sys.stdout
#

It appears that the 'print' statement always uses file.write if
isinstance(sys.stdout, file).  I don't know whether this has been
reported as a bug before, or if there's a reason for the current
behavior.  It may be an accidental behavior that is left over from the
days when builtin types were not subclassable.

Jeff


pgp7JrGs05dLk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Writing to stdout and a log file

2005-04-19 Thread Mike
Thanks.

I should've mentioned I want StdoutLog to subclass the 'file' type
because I need all the file attributes available.

I could add all the standard file methods and attributes to StdoutLog
without subclassing  'file' but I'd rather avoid this if I can.

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Writing to stdout and a log file

2005-04-19 Thread Jeff Epler
In that case, it looks like you won't be able to get what you want
without modifying CPython.  PRINT_ITEM calls PyFile_SoftSpace,
PyFile_WriteString, and PyFile_WriteObject, which all use
PyFile_Check().  It might be as simple as changing these to
PyFile_CheckExact() calls in PyFile_WriteString / PyFile_WriteObject,
but I have no idea whether the test suite still works after this change
is made.  It does make this program work (it prints things from X.write):

class X(file):
def write(self, s):
print X.write, `s`
return file.write(self, s)

import sys
x = X(/tmp/out.txt, w)
print x, 42

I don't care to be the champion of this patch, or to submit it to
sourceforge; I suspect there should be a better review of PyFile_Check
vs PyFile_CheckExact uses in fileobject.c, instead of just picking the
few spots that make this usage work.  Before being submitted as a patch,
a testcase should be added too.  Feel free to run with this if you feel
strongly about it.

Jeff

Index: Objects/fileobject.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Objects/fileobject.c,v
retrieving revision 2.193
diff -u -u -r2.193 fileobject.c
--- Objects/fileobject.c7 Nov 2004 14:15:28 -   2.193
+++ Objects/fileobject.c20 Apr 2005 02:41:32 -
@@ -2012,7 +2012,7 @@
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError, writeobject with NULL file);
return -1;
}
-   else if (PyFile_Check(f)) {
+   else if (PyFile_CheckExact(f)) {
FILE *fp = PyFile_AsFile(f);
 #ifdef Py_USING_UNICODE
PyObject *enc = ((PyFileObject*)f)-f_encoding;
@@ -2082,7 +2082,7 @@
null file for PyFile_WriteString);
return -1;
}
-   else if (PyFile_Check(f)) {
+   else if (PyFile_CheckExact(f)) {
FILE *fp = PyFile_AsFile(f);
if (fp == NULL) {
err_closed();



pgpnLHNwKqjp4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list