Re: Will Python 3 be stackless?
multiprocessing is good enough for now, On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Phillip B Oldham schrieb: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, it will definitely not. From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if I've taken it out of context) it would seem that such features are frowned-upon. Is this correct? And if so, why? You got the wrong impression. It's not frowned upon. It just is a lot of extra effort to implemnt thus makes the development of normal features more complex. Diez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Will Python 3 be stackless?
Will Python 3 be stackless? Or, rather, will it have any features similar to stackless' microthreads and channels? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Will Python 3 be stackless?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Phillip B Oldham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will Python 3 be stackless? Or, rather, will it have any features similar to stackless' microthreads and channels? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list No, it will definitely not. But it does have the new multiprocessing module: http://docs.python.org/library/multiprocessing.html#module-multiprocessing Cheers, Chris -- Follow the path of the Iguana... http://rebertia.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Will Python 3 be stackless?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, it will definitely not. From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if I've taken it out of context) it would seem that such features are frowned-upon. Is this correct? And if so, why? -- Phillip B Oldham [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 (0) 7525 01 09 01 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Will Python 3 be stackless?
Phillip B Oldham schrieb: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, it will definitely not. From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if I've taken it out of context) it would seem that such features are frowned-upon. Is this correct? And if so, why? You got the wrong impression. It's not frowned upon. It just is a lot of extra effort to implemnt thus makes the development of normal features more complex. Diez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Will Python 3 be stackless?
Phillip B Oldham wrote: Will Python 3 be ... The features of Python 3.0 are fixed; there are just a few remaining bugs to fix before the final release. Download the release candidate or look at the online manual at http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
