[python-tulip] StreamReader.readline() limit
Hi, StreamReader.read() can reed unlimited data, but StreamReader.readline() is limited by the limit paramter of the StreamReader constructor. It is not possible to pass None. Is there a reason for that? Victor
Re: [python-tulip] Interacting with sys.stdin/sys.stdout/sys.stderr
2014-02-20 8:57 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Slenders jonathan.slend...@gmail.com: Thanks, the example is very clear and helpful! Sorry, but I didn't understand your opinion on the patch. Does it look correct? It just found a new issue with the non-blocking mode when the cat program is used as input. IMO the pipe should not be set to non-blocking if it's a TTY. The worst case with my patch would be that the write protocol is not notified immediatly when the PTY is closed or if the file descriptor is closed, but only at the next write. Or would it be better to use a duplex pipe transport for PTY? Victor
Re: [python-tulip] Re: Tulip third-party projects and Trollius
On 2/20/2014, 12:54 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: The source transformation route has not been very popular with Python 2 vs. 3 porting projects. It's not popular, but nevertheless, many use it just fine. I wonder if it would be possible (using asyncio internals) to write a From() function that lets you write yield From(x) instead of yield from x in Tulip? I think it's doable. Although, I'm not sure we should include this in asyncio, as we either should encourage people to use 'yield From' in asyncio and python3, or we'll end up with half code using one form, and half using another. Yury
Re: [python-tulip] Re: Tulip third-party projects and Trollius
It should not be part of asyncio, but a separate library on PyPI, like six. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Yury Selivanov yselivanov...@gmail.comwrote: On 2/20/2014, 12:54 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: The source transformation route has not been very popular with Python 2 vs. 3 porting projects. It's not popular, but nevertheless, many use it just fine. I wonder if it would be possible (using asyncio internals) to write a From() function that lets you write yield From(x) instead of yield from x in Tulip? I think it's doable. Although, I'm not sure we should include this in asyncio, as we either should encourage people to use 'yield From' in asyncio and python3, or we'll end up with half code using one form, and half using another. Yury -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
