Re: Next Plan for AOO 4.0 Testing
Daniel, Thanks a lot! I will assign you more test cases on Win 7, please make sure to switch the latest snapshot build(contains stlport change) for testing. We now have another work with more higher priority, that is to do a quick go through with latest dev snapshot build(contains stlport change), if you have interest on it, I will send you the general testing list. Thanks! Regards, Yu Zhen On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Daniel Alvaro wrote: > Hello, > I finished the cases that I had assigned. > > Could you assign me more test cases? > I'm working on win 7 > Regards, > Daniel Alvaro >
Re: Triage for AOO 4.0.0 Release Blockers
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:34 AM, I. Park wrote: > Hello Rob, > > O.k., I'm not too sure if your "incorrectly marked CONFIRMED" topic > mentioned below has to do with Bugzilla, but I noticed on couple > occasions that when filling out new bugs the CONFIRMED is set by > default. I had to go back a few times and change it to UNCONFIRMED. > That's fine. When a tester enters a new bug it probably should be marked CONFIRMED. That's because testers know what they are doing and would only enter a bug report for a bug that was real and reproducible. -Rob > Just my two-cents. > > I. Park > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> On 6/6/13 1:54 PM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi All, Here is the list of identified candidates[1]/[2] which are proposed to be 4.0.0 release blockers. Please indicate your selections for release blockers by giving 1 vote to 1 bug (the vote field is beside the importance field, in a bug form). We hope to get the vote score this week, any bugs you think most critical to you, please bring out and let's discuss. >>> >>> Please wait, I think we have not agreed on this approach. Voting in the >>> issue is not really helpful. I believe many of these issues can be >>> removed from list and are probably not valid at all. >>> >>> I prefer to discuss showstopper issues on the list as we did for AOO 3.4. >>> >> >> With 3.4 we proposed each release blocker on the list, in its own >> thread, right? But it is not going the be much better if we start >> with 90 new threads. >> >> It looks like all the proposed release blockers are marked confirmed. >> A few of them pre-date AOO 3.4, but most are more recent. >> >> But with a further look I see some were incorrectly marked >> "CONFIRMED". I think some volunteers when they first started set that >> field after trying to confirm a defect, without understanding that >> this state should only set if the confirmation test was successful. >> So we need to review the comments on each bug to see which ones are >> actually reproduced.I'll try to clean up a few tonight while I >> watch TV. >> >> Also, we probably need to prioritize. For example, a "shallow crash" >> (a crash in a common. top-level operation) is higher priority than a >> crash that only occurs with a specific malformed document. >> >> -Rob >> >>> Juergen >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=4.0.0_release_blocker%3F&sharer_id=249289&list_id=64740 [2] Also attach the file for the list (AOO4.0.0_release_blocker_candidates.ods) Regards, Yu Zhen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Regarding test case 1502 (writer)
Thanks Regina, So do need to update the test case as "pass"? Prachi From: Regina Henschel To: qa@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Friday, 7 June 2013 10:49 AM Subject: Re: Regarding test case 1502 (writer) Hi, Liu Ping schrieb: > hi , Prachi > > I think the picture object also should be applicable to Step 4 to Step 10 > > Indeed , I can't see rotation section in position and size section in > sidebar in writer > > But I try create a picture and see rotation section in spreadsheet and > impress > > so i suggest you create new bug in bugzilla (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/) No, it is no bug. Picture inserted in Writer are different from pictures inserted in Draw. Write-pictures do not have the ability to rotate. If you insert a picture in Draw and then copy it to Writer, then you get a Draw-picture and that can be rotated. Issue for the problem is https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3545 Kind regards Regina > > Thanks your support > > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote: > >> IMHO fail the test. >> Rotation can not be found. >> >> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 18:38, Prachi Jain wrote: >>> Hi , >>> >>> >> http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/lib/testcases/archiveData.php?edit=testcase&id=18967 >>> >>> Step No. 3 Insert a drawing object, or a picture. >>> >>> After inserting drawing object all the test steps (4 to 10) works as >> expected, but after inserting picture should I need to execute all the >> steps( 4 to10 ). If yes , then in position and size section I could not see >> rotation section.Is it a bug? or I just need to run all the test steps for >> drawing object not for picture. Please help. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Prachi >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Regarding test case 1502 (writer)
Hi, Liu Ping schrieb: hi , Prachi I think the picture object also should be applicable to Step 4 to Step 10 Indeed , I can't see rotation section in position and size section in sidebar in writer But I try create a picture and see rotation section in spreadsheet and impress so i suggest you create new bug in bugzilla (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/) No, it is no bug. Picture inserted in Writer are different from pictures inserted in Draw. Write-pictures do not have the ability to rotate. If you insert a picture in Draw and then copy it to Writer, then you get a Draw-picture and that can be rotated. Issue for the problem is https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3545 Kind regards Regina Thanks your support On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote: IMHO fail the test. Rotation can not be found. On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 18:38, Prachi Jain wrote: Hi , http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/lib/testcases/archiveData.php?edit=testcase&id=18967 Step No. 3 Insert a drawing object, or a picture. After inserting drawing object all the test steps (4 to 10) works as expected, but after inserting picture should I need to execute all the steps( 4 to10 ). If yes , then in position and size section I could not see rotation section.Is it a bug? or I just need to run all the test steps for drawing object not for picture. Please help. Thanks Prachi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Triage for AOO 4.0.0 Release Blockers
Hello Rob, O.k., I'm not too sure if your "incorrectly marked CONFIRMED" topic mentioned below has to do with Bugzilla, but I noticed on couple occasions that when filling out new bugs the CONFIRMED is set by default. I had to go back a few times and change it to UNCONFIRMED. Just my two-cents. I. Park On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 6/6/13 1:54 PM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Here is the list of identified candidates[1]/[2] which are proposed to >>> be 4.0.0 release blockers. Please indicate your selections for release >>> blockers by giving 1 vote to 1 bug (the vote field is beside the >>> importance field, in a bug form). We hope to get the vote score this >>> week, any bugs you think most critical to you, please bring out and >>> let's discuss. >> >> Please wait, I think we have not agreed on this approach. Voting in the >> issue is not really helpful. I believe many of these issues can be >> removed from list and are probably not valid at all. >> >> I prefer to discuss showstopper issues on the list as we did for AOO 3.4. >> > > With 3.4 we proposed each release blocker on the list, in its own > thread, right? But it is not going the be much better if we start > with 90 new threads. > > It looks like all the proposed release blockers are marked confirmed. > A few of them pre-date AOO 3.4, but most are more recent. > > But with a further look I see some were incorrectly marked > "CONFIRMED". I think some volunteers when they first started set that > field after trying to confirm a defect, without understanding that > this state should only set if the confirmation test was successful. > So we need to review the comments on each bug to see which ones are > actually reproduced.I'll try to clean up a few tonight while I > watch TV. > > Also, we probably need to prioritize. For example, a "shallow crash" > (a crash in a common. top-level operation) is higher priority than a > crash that only occurs with a specific malformed document. > > -Rob > >> Juergen >> >> >>> >>> [1] >>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=4.0.0_release_blocker%3F&sharer_id=249289&list_id=64740 >>> [2] Also attach the file for the list >>> (AOO4.0.0_release_blocker_candidates.ods) >>> >>> Regards, >>> Yu Zhen >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20130607
Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.0 Full Regression test this week, here is the weekly update (6/3 - 6/7), please find more detail statistics in wiki: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/WeeklyReport/20130607 *Test execution: * We have assigned 1732 text executions to about 20 volunteers, and completed about 62% in execution (1072 test execution done). We have exceed the target a little bit more which is to %100 attempted 1000 test executions before June 6. Next, we will retest the failed/blocked test executions as the defects get fixed *Defect summary:* 1. 46 defects are opened and 24 defects are resolved this week, so we have 18 (46-24) net new defects added in the backlog 2. Expose 1 Redhat specific defect during quick testing on RHEL with 64-bit Java, Bug 122485 ([Crash]OOO crash when apply animation for table/chart object) need to set priority as it makes OOO crash *Issues & quality highlight:* 1. We achieve the execution goal as planned on June 6, the pass rate is 90% 2. Test results on Redhat have been updated from local to Testlink, combine the general use testing to give assessment on this platform - overall is good 3. Do general use testing on Redhat for assessment - one crash issue, need set priority for it 1. Bug 122485 - [Crash]OOO crash when apply animation for table/chart object 4. Initiate the triage of bugs for AOO 4.0.0 release blockers 5. QAs are reminded to make sure to switch to the new snapshot build(contains stlport change) for testing *Volunteer status: * 1. We have 1 more volunteer joining test executions 2. No new volunteer(total 6 so far) on defect work, the progress on confirming defects are low, need more to clean backlog of unconfirmed and resolved defects *Plan for next week:* 1. Do testing of upgrading/updating a former AOO/OOo's versions 2. Start acceptance testing on stlport change on Win7/Mac/RHEL/Ubuntu platforms 3. Work with development to prioritize critical defects as 4.0.0 release blockers and assign them to Dev volunteers 4. Retest the failed/blocked test executions as the defects get fixed Thanks you all for your effort this week, it is a great community here, we finally achieve the execution target on full regression testing!! Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Regarding test case 1502 (writer)
hi , Prachi I think the picture object also should be applicable to Step 4 to Step 10 Indeed , I can't see rotation section in position and size section in sidebar in writer But I try create a picture and see rotation section in spreadsheet and impress so i suggest you create new bug in bugzilla (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/) Thanks your support On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote: > IMHO fail the test. > Rotation can not be found. > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 18:38, Prachi Jain wrote: > > Hi , > > > > > http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/lib/testcases/archiveData.php?edit=testcase&id=18967 > > > > Step No. 3 Insert a drawing object, or a picture. > > > > After inserting drawing object all the test steps (4 to 10) works as > expected, but after inserting picture should I need to execute all the > steps( 4 to10 ). If yes , then in position and size section I could not see > rotation section.Is it a bug? or I just need to run all the test steps for > drawing object not for picture. Please help. > > > > Thanks > > Prachi > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
Re: Hello from a "simple" user
Hi Simone and welcome! On 07.06.2013 00:40, Simone wrote: My name name is Simon and I use OpenOffice family from several years, also on works (mainly Write, a little bit Calc; rarely Draw or Impress); i write nearly 60 pages of paper works, also using macro to interface it with a software I made. I said "family" meaning also the LibreOffice fork: I've installed both on my computers 'cause each has its own good & bad. My former hope was LibreOffice, now it's OpenOffice 4: I highly appreciated your public questions about people desires about 4.0 version, because a great defect in LibreOffice is that, IMHO, they lost the "normal" user (AKA non-geek) point of view, introducing very specialistic feature, cleaning of source, improvement in speed, but still remain many ugly interface defects that make this software less easy to use for a simple user (like my parents) vs old (but easier) word 97/2000. I find horrible having non resizeable window in some option window, ugly the way to redefine toolbar or keyboard, also worse the macro interface, but also lacking a simple way to put line pages (centered in bottom) without knowing about fields & c. or not hint as file name the first line of the document or a way to save/transfer easily configuration from one computer to another (also better by clouds). I'd like to show OO to my friends saying "It's easier than your old Word": hope I will soon! If I can help, I'm here. You can ;-) I think this is a very good statement (!). I would suggest to make single, concrete suggestions, discuss these and - if some agreement - put them as mail to the developer list, or directly write feature tasks. Maybe think about a starting label for tasks and eMails (like '[sidebar]' (with the parantheses) was used for sidebar development. Make something up e.g. '[UiSImplification]' (probably too long). Use that label in eMails as start for the title and for bug reports/feature tasks as well to easily reference them. HTH! Sincerely, Armin *Simone * -- ALG - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
