Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] util: add Error object for qemu_open_internal error reporting

2020-08-27 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:03:19PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé  writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 05:14:21PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Daniel P. Berrangé  writes:
> >> 
> >> > Instead of relying on the limited information from errno, we can now
> >> > also provide detailed error messages.
> >> 
> >> The more detailed error messages are currently always ignored, but the
> >> next patches will fix that.
> >> 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
> >> > ---
> >> >  util/osdep.c | 21 +++--
> >> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/util/osdep.c b/util/osdep.c
> >> > index 9ff92551e7..9c7118d3cb 100644
> >> > --- a/util/osdep.c
> >> > +++ b/util/osdep.c
> >> > @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ int qemu_lock_fd_test(int fd, int64_t start, int64_t 
> >> > len, bool exclusive)
> >> >   * Opens a file with FD_CLOEXEC set
> >> >   */
> >> >  static int
> >> > -qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t mode)
> >> > +qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t mode, Error 
> >> > **errp)
> >> >  {
> >> >  int ret;
> >> >  
> >> > @@ -298,24 +298,31 @@ qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, 
> >> > mode_t mode)
> >> >  
> >> >  fdset_id = qemu_parse_fdset(fdset_id_str);
> >> >  if (fdset_id == -1) {
> >> > +error_setg(errp, "Could not parse fdset %s", name);
> >> >  errno = EINVAL;
> >> >  return -1;
> >> >  }
> >> >  
> >> >  fd = monitor_fdset_get_fd(fdset_id, flags);
> >> >  if (fd < 0) {
> >> > +error_setg_errno(errp, -fd, "Could not acquire FD for %s 
> >> > flags %x",
> >> > + name, flags);
> >> >  errno = -fd;
> >> >  return -1;
> >> >  }
> >> >  
> >> >  dupfd = qemu_dup_flags(fd, flags);
> >> >  if (dupfd == -1) {
> >> > +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Could not dup FD for %s 
> >> > flags %x",
> >> > + name, flags);
> >> >  return -1;
> >> >  }
> >> >  
> >> >  ret = monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add(fdset_id, dupfd);
> >> >  if (ret == -1) {
> >> >  close(dupfd);
> >> > +error_setg(errp, "Could not save FD for %s flags %x",
> >> > +   name, flags);
> >> 
> >> Can this happen?
> >
> > Well there's code in monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add that can return -1.
> 
> It fails when
> 
> * @fdset_id contains @dupfd
> 
>   @dupfd is a fresh file descriptor.  If @fdset_id already contains it,
>   it's stale there.  That would be a programming error.  Recommend to
>   assert.
> 
> * @fdset_id is not in @mon_fdsets
> 
>   monitor_fdset_get_fd() fails the same way.  monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add()
>   can fail that way after monitor_fdset_get_fd() succeed only if the fd
>   set went away between the two.  Could that happen?  Would it be safe?
> 
>   This is the only user of monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add().  Why not remove
>   the awkward failure mode by making monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add() dup the
>   fd and add?

Once we push  the qemu_dup call into monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add, we
might as well go the whole way and merge monitor_fdset_get_fd
into it too. So I've done that, turning 3 calls into 1.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com  -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] util: add Error object for qemu_open_internal error reporting

2020-08-26 Thread Markus Armbruster
Daniel P. Berrangé  writes:

> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 05:14:21PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé  writes:
>> 
>> > Instead of relying on the limited information from errno, we can now
>> > also provide detailed error messages.
>> 
>> The more detailed error messages are currently always ignored, but the
>> next patches will fix that.
>> 
>> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
>> > ---
>> >  util/osdep.c | 21 +++--
>> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/util/osdep.c b/util/osdep.c
>> > index 9ff92551e7..9c7118d3cb 100644
>> > --- a/util/osdep.c
>> > +++ b/util/osdep.c
>> > @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ int qemu_lock_fd_test(int fd, int64_t start, int64_t 
>> > len, bool exclusive)
>> >   * Opens a file with FD_CLOEXEC set
>> >   */
>> >  static int
>> > -qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t mode)
>> > +qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t mode, Error **errp)
>> >  {
>> >  int ret;
>> >  
>> > @@ -298,24 +298,31 @@ qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, 
>> > mode_t mode)
>> >  
>> >  fdset_id = qemu_parse_fdset(fdset_id_str);
>> >  if (fdset_id == -1) {
>> > +error_setg(errp, "Could not parse fdset %s", name);
>> >  errno = EINVAL;
>> >  return -1;
>> >  }
>> >  
>> >  fd = monitor_fdset_get_fd(fdset_id, flags);
>> >  if (fd < 0) {
>> > +error_setg_errno(errp, -fd, "Could not acquire FD for %s 
>> > flags %x",
>> > + name, flags);
>> >  errno = -fd;
>> >  return -1;
>> >  }
>> >  
>> >  dupfd = qemu_dup_flags(fd, flags);
>> >  if (dupfd == -1) {
>> > +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Could not dup FD for %s flags 
>> > %x",
>> > + name, flags);
>> >  return -1;
>> >  }
>> >  
>> >  ret = monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add(fdset_id, dupfd);
>> >  if (ret == -1) {
>> >  close(dupfd);
>> > +error_setg(errp, "Could not save FD for %s flags %x",
>> > +   name, flags);
>> 
>> Can this happen?
>
> Well there's code in monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add that can return -1.

It fails when

* @fdset_id contains @dupfd

  @dupfd is a fresh file descriptor.  If @fdset_id already contains it,
  it's stale there.  That would be a programming error.  Recommend to
  assert.

* @fdset_id is not in @mon_fdsets

  monitor_fdset_get_fd() fails the same way.  monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add()
  can fail that way after monitor_fdset_get_fd() succeed only if the fd
  set went away between the two.  Could that happen?  Would it be safe?

  This is the only user of monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add().  Why not remove
  the awkward failure mode by making monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add() dup the
  fd and add?

>> >  errno = EINVAL;
>> >  return -1;
>> >  }
>> > @@ -336,6 +343,16 @@ qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, 
>> > mode_t mode)
>> >  }
>> >  #endif /* ! O_CLOEXEC */
>> >  
>> > +if (ret == -1) {
>> > +const char *action = "open";
>> > +if (flags & O_CREAT) {
>> > +action = "create";
>> > +}
>> > +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Could not %s '%s' flags 0x%x",
>> > + action, name, flags);
>> 
>> Not a good user experience:
>> 
>> Could not open '/etc/shadow' flags 0x0: Permission denied
>> 
>> Better:
>> 
>> Could not open '/etc/shadow' for reading: Permission denied
>> 
>> Are you sure flags other than the access mode (O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY,
>> O_RDWR) must be included in the error message?
>
> It was the flags other than access mode that I was thinking were
> more important to log. I'm ambivalent htough, so can drop the
> flags if it is thought to be overkill.

Hexadecimal flags are borderline useless even for developers: to make
sense of them, you have to grep -R /usr/include/.  For mere mortals,
they are confusing in addition to useless.

>> If you must report flags in hexadecimal, then please reporting them more
>> consistently.  Right now you have
>> 
>> for %s flags 0x%x
>> '%s' flags %x
>> 
>> Perhaps '%s' with flags 0x%x
>> 
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +
>> >  return ret;
>> >  }
>> >  
>> > @@ -352,7 +369,7 @@ int qemu_open_old(const char *name, int flags, ...)
>> >  }
>> >  va_end(ap);
>> >  
>> > -ret = qemu_open_internal(name, flags, mode);
>> > +ret = qemu_open_internal(name, flags, mode, NULL);
>> >  
>> >  #ifdef O_DIRECT
>> >  if (ret == -1 && errno == EINVAL && (flags & O_DIRECT)) {
>> 
>> 
>
> Regards,
> Daniel




Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] util: add Error object for qemu_open_internal error reporting

2020-08-25 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 05:14:21PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé  writes:
> 
> > Instead of relying on the limited information from errno, we can now
> > also provide detailed error messages.
> 
> The more detailed error messages are currently always ignored, but the
> next patches will fix that.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
> > ---
> >  util/osdep.c | 21 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/util/osdep.c b/util/osdep.c
> > index 9ff92551e7..9c7118d3cb 100644
> > --- a/util/osdep.c
> > +++ b/util/osdep.c
> > @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ int qemu_lock_fd_test(int fd, int64_t start, int64_t 
> > len, bool exclusive)
> >   * Opens a file with FD_CLOEXEC set
> >   */
> >  static int
> > -qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t mode)
> > +qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t mode, Error **errp)
> >  {
> >  int ret;
> >  
> > @@ -298,24 +298,31 @@ qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, 
> > mode_t mode)
> >  
> >  fdset_id = qemu_parse_fdset(fdset_id_str);
> >  if (fdset_id == -1) {
> > +error_setg(errp, "Could not parse fdset %s", name);
> >  errno = EINVAL;
> >  return -1;
> >  }
> >  
> >  fd = monitor_fdset_get_fd(fdset_id, flags);
> >  if (fd < 0) {
> > +error_setg_errno(errp, -fd, "Could not acquire FD for %s flags 
> > %x",
> > + name, flags);
> >  errno = -fd;
> >  return -1;
> >  }
> >  
> >  dupfd = qemu_dup_flags(fd, flags);
> >  if (dupfd == -1) {
> > +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Could not dup FD for %s flags 
> > %x",
> > + name, flags);
> >  return -1;
> >  }
> >  
> >  ret = monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add(fdset_id, dupfd);
> >  if (ret == -1) {
> >  close(dupfd);
> > +error_setg(errp, "Could not save FD for %s flags %x",
> > +   name, flags);
> 
> Can this happen?

Well there's code in monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add that can return -1.

> 
> >  errno = EINVAL;
> >  return -1;
> >  }
> > @@ -336,6 +343,16 @@ qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t 
> > mode)
> >  }
> >  #endif /* ! O_CLOEXEC */
> >  
> > +if (ret == -1) {
> > +const char *action = "open";
> > +if (flags & O_CREAT) {
> > +action = "create";
> > +}
> > +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Could not %s '%s' flags 0x%x",
> > + action, name, flags);
> 
> Not a good user experience:
> 
> Could not open '/etc/shadow' flags 0x0: Permission denied
> 
> Better:
> 
> Could not open '/etc/shadow' for reading: Permission denied
> 
> Are you sure flags other than the access mode (O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY,
> O_RDWR) must be included in the error message?

It was the flags other than access mode that I was thinking were
more important to log. I'm ambivalent htough, so can drop the
flags if it is thought to be overkill.

> 
> If you must report flags in hexadecimal, then please reporting them more
> consistently.  Right now you have
> 
> for %s flags 0x%x
> '%s' flags %x
> 
> Perhaps '%s' with flags 0x%x
> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> >  return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -352,7 +369,7 @@ int qemu_open_old(const char *name, int flags, ...)
> >  }
> >  va_end(ap);
> >  
> > -ret = qemu_open_internal(name, flags, mode);
> > +ret = qemu_open_internal(name, flags, mode, NULL);
> >  
> >  #ifdef O_DIRECT
> >  if (ret == -1 && errno == EINVAL && (flags & O_DIRECT)) {
> 
> 

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com  -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] util: add Error object for qemu_open_internal error reporting

2020-08-25 Thread Markus Armbruster
Daniel P. Berrangé  writes:

> Instead of relying on the limited information from errno, we can now
> also provide detailed error messages.

The more detailed error messages are currently always ignored, but the
next patches will fix that.

> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
> ---
>  util/osdep.c | 21 +++--
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/util/osdep.c b/util/osdep.c
> index 9ff92551e7..9c7118d3cb 100644
> --- a/util/osdep.c
> +++ b/util/osdep.c
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ int qemu_lock_fd_test(int fd, int64_t start, int64_t len, 
> bool exclusive)
>   * Opens a file with FD_CLOEXEC set
>   */
>  static int
> -qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t mode)
> +qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t mode, Error **errp)
>  {
>  int ret;
>  
> @@ -298,24 +298,31 @@ qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t 
> mode)
>  
>  fdset_id = qemu_parse_fdset(fdset_id_str);
>  if (fdset_id == -1) {
> +error_setg(errp, "Could not parse fdset %s", name);
>  errno = EINVAL;
>  return -1;
>  }
>  
>  fd = monitor_fdset_get_fd(fdset_id, flags);
>  if (fd < 0) {
> +error_setg_errno(errp, -fd, "Could not acquire FD for %s flags 
> %x",
> + name, flags);
>  errno = -fd;
>  return -1;
>  }
>  
>  dupfd = qemu_dup_flags(fd, flags);
>  if (dupfd == -1) {
> +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Could not dup FD for %s flags %x",
> + name, flags);
>  return -1;
>  }
>  
>  ret = monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add(fdset_id, dupfd);
>  if (ret == -1) {
>  close(dupfd);
> +error_setg(errp, "Could not save FD for %s flags %x",
> +   name, flags);

Can this happen?

>  errno = EINVAL;
>  return -1;
>  }
> @@ -336,6 +343,16 @@ qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t 
> mode)
>  }
>  #endif /* ! O_CLOEXEC */
>  
> +if (ret == -1) {
> +const char *action = "open";
> +if (flags & O_CREAT) {
> +action = "create";
> +}
> +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Could not %s '%s' flags 0x%x",
> + action, name, flags);

Not a good user experience:

Could not open '/etc/shadow' flags 0x0: Permission denied

Better:

Could not open '/etc/shadow' for reading: Permission denied

Are you sure flags other than the access mode (O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY,
O_RDWR) must be included in the error message?

If you must report flags in hexadecimal, then please reporting them more
consistently.  Right now you have

for %s flags 0x%x
'%s' flags %x

Perhaps '%s' with flags 0x%x

> +}
> +
> +
>  return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -352,7 +369,7 @@ int qemu_open_old(const char *name, int flags, ...)
>  }
>  va_end(ap);
>  
> -ret = qemu_open_internal(name, flags, mode);
> +ret = qemu_open_internal(name, flags, mode, NULL);
>  
>  #ifdef O_DIRECT
>  if (ret == -1 && errno == EINVAL && (flags & O_DIRECT)) {




[PATCH v4 3/6] util: add Error object for qemu_open_internal error reporting

2020-08-21 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
Instead of relying on the limited information from errno, we can now
also provide detailed error messages.

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
---
 util/osdep.c | 21 +++--
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/util/osdep.c b/util/osdep.c
index 9ff92551e7..9c7118d3cb 100644
--- a/util/osdep.c
+++ b/util/osdep.c
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ int qemu_lock_fd_test(int fd, int64_t start, int64_t len, 
bool exclusive)
  * Opens a file with FD_CLOEXEC set
  */
 static int
-qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t mode)
+qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t mode, Error **errp)
 {
 int ret;
 
@@ -298,24 +298,31 @@ qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t 
mode)
 
 fdset_id = qemu_parse_fdset(fdset_id_str);
 if (fdset_id == -1) {
+error_setg(errp, "Could not parse fdset %s", name);
 errno = EINVAL;
 return -1;
 }
 
 fd = monitor_fdset_get_fd(fdset_id, flags);
 if (fd < 0) {
+error_setg_errno(errp, -fd, "Could not acquire FD for %s flags %x",
+ name, flags);
 errno = -fd;
 return -1;
 }
 
 dupfd = qemu_dup_flags(fd, flags);
 if (dupfd == -1) {
+error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Could not dup FD for %s flags %x",
+ name, flags);
 return -1;
 }
 
 ret = monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add(fdset_id, dupfd);
 if (ret == -1) {
 close(dupfd);
+error_setg(errp, "Could not save FD for %s flags %x",
+   name, flags);
 errno = EINVAL;
 return -1;
 }
@@ -336,6 +343,16 @@ qemu_open_internal(const char *name, int flags, mode_t 
mode)
 }
 #endif /* ! O_CLOEXEC */
 
+if (ret == -1) {
+const char *action = "open";
+if (flags & O_CREAT) {
+action = "create";
+}
+error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Could not %s '%s' flags 0x%x",
+ action, name, flags);
+}
+
+
 return ret;
 }
 
@@ -352,7 +369,7 @@ int qemu_open_old(const char *name, int flags, ...)
 }
 va_end(ap);
 
-ret = qemu_open_internal(name, flags, mode);
+ret = qemu_open_internal(name, flags, mode, NULL);
 
 #ifdef O_DIRECT
 if (ret == -1 && errno == EINVAL && (flags & O_DIRECT)) {
-- 
2.26.2