From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com>

Rename size and make it int64_t to correspond to modern block layer,
which always uses int64_t for offset and bytes (not in blk layer yet,
which is a task for following commits).

All callers pass int or unsigned int.

So, for bytes in [0, INT_MAX] nothing is changed, for negative bytes we
now fail on "bytes < 0" check instead of "bytes > INT_MAX" check.

Note, that blk_check_byte_request() still doesn't allow requests
exceeding INT_MAX.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20211006131718.214235-2-vsement...@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
---
 block/block-backend.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/block-backend.c b/block/block-backend.c
index ba2b5ebb1008..2c62210687e7 100644
--- a/block/block-backend.c
+++ b/block/block-backend.c
@@ -1161,11 +1161,11 @@ void blk_set_disable_request_queuing(BlockBackend *blk, 
bool disable)
 }

 static int blk_check_byte_request(BlockBackend *blk, int64_t offset,
-                                  size_t size)
+                                  int64_t bytes)
 {
     int64_t len;

-    if (size > INT_MAX) {
+    if (bytes < 0 || bytes > INT_MAX) {
         return -EIO;
     }

@@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static int blk_check_byte_request(BlockBackend *blk, 
int64_t offset,
             return len;
         }

-        if (offset > len || len - offset < size) {
+        if (offset > len || len - offset < bytes) {
             return -EIO;
         }
     }
-- 
2.31.1


Reply via email to