Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU GUI
Chris Wilson wrote: > > QT is only now free on Windows, and supports far fewer platforms than wx > (no Mac support?). I personally don't like tcl as a language, and prefer > to code in C++ for efficiency. qt/mac exists. > > GTK is also specific to Unix (not Mac) and Windows, and looks weird on > Windows, not very native. gtk/cocoa exists. > > Or platforms other than Windows and Unix. name them, macosx has X and cocoa mostly supported by major toolkits. tk+tile works everywhere and is also looking good. =) lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU GUI
Chris Wilson wrote: > > I'd be interested to know why you dislike it. The library is incompatible with itself depending on the configure time options (see string constructors vs unicode string constructors) Its ABI/API changes too often (ok, that is the result of they fixing lots of bugs that require radical changes, but they could haven't been on first place...) Its architecture is a tad old. > I actually find it very > nice to code in wx, much easier than GTK or MFC or raw Win32 API. Try Qt or ewl/etk if you don't like the default tcl/tk look, all 4 are quite nicer architecture-wise and less painful to be handled as dependence. MFC and winapi are surely worst than wx, gtk on the other hand is simple and relatively easy to learn. The main/only point of wx is that mimics quite well some sort of native look&feel, and that is just nice if you have to handle windows users or idiotic managers. -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU GUI
Fabrice Bellard wrote: > Hi, > > Concerning the QEMU GUI, my mind slightly evolved since my last posts on > the topic: I think that a wxWidgets GUI would be the best as it is > reasonnably portable and because it uses the native GUIs. wx is nasty at best. -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.7.0 does not compile with binutils 2.16
Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > On 10/6/2005 19:54:53, Gioele Barabucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >>I tried to compile qemu 0.7.0 on my gentoo-ppc box. > > ... > >>I used gcc-3.4.3, binutils 2.16 and gentoo's glibc 2.3.4.20041102-r1 with > >>NPTL. > > > Posting a bug to Gentoo's bugzilla would be a good idea > (http://bugs.gentoo.org). > Since binutils-2.16 is ~ppc (i.e. being tested), you could try the latest > stable > version of binutils (2.15.90.0.3-r5). That would demonstrate whether it's a > binutils issue or not. The problem got already reported in the gentoo bugzilla and in the binutils bugzilla. As I wrote before the issue is in the linker scripts. isn't a ld problems (it does the right thing) nor a distribution problem (I'm not so keen on use a older and probably with more issues open version) lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
[Qemu-devel] Linker issues with binutils 2.16 on ppc
ld complains about "Not enough room for program headers" That's is due the use of SIZEOF_HEADERS in the linker script. Reproduced with the current cvs on the -user targets. Since I have no experience about ld script so I didn't try to figure out myself a fix. Basic system info: gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r0, 2.6.11-gentoo-r9 binutils-2.16 lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
