Re: [PATCH] nvdimm: release the correct device list
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:59:33PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 06:40:01 + > "lizhij...@fujitsu.com" wrote: > > > ping again > > Michael, > > can you include this in your next pull req, please? ok > > > > > > > > On 30/08/2021 09:04, Li Zhijian wrote: > > > ping > > > > > > > > > On 03/08/2021 12:00, Li, Zhijian wrote: > > >> ping > > >> > > >> Any body could help to review/queue this patch ? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 2021/6/29 22:05, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > >>> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:04:15 +0800 > > >>> Li Zhijian wrote: > > >>> > > Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian > > >>> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov > > >>> > > --- > > hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 12 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > > index e3d5fe19392..ff317263e85 100644 > > --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > > +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > > @@ -355,10 +355,10 @@ nvdimm_build_structure_caps(GArray *structures, > > uint32_t capabilities) > > static GArray *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) > > { > > - GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); > > + GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); > > GArray *structures = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */, 1); > > - for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { > > + for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = > > device_list->next) { > > DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; > > /* build System Physical Address Range Structure. */ > > @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static GArray > > *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) > > /* build NVDIMM Control Region Structure. */ > > nvdimm_build_structure_dcr(structures, dev); > > } > > - g_slist_free(device_list); > > + g_slist_free(list); > > if (state->persistence) { > > nvdimm_build_structure_caps(structures, state->persistence); > > @@ -1339,9 +1339,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GArray > > *table_offsets, GArray *table_data, > > void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) > > { > > - GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); > > + GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); > > - for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { > > + for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = > > device_list->next) { > > AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem = NULL; > > DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; > > Object *obj = OBJECT(dev); > > @@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) > > build_srat_memory(numamem, addr, size, node, > > MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED | > > MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE); > > } > > - g_slist_free(device_list); > > + g_slist_free(list); > > } > > void nvdimm_build_acpi(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data, > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
Re: [PATCH] nvdimm: release the correct device list
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 06:40:01 + "lizhij...@fujitsu.com" wrote: > ping again Michael, can you include this in your next pull req, please? > > > > On 30/08/2021 09:04, Li Zhijian wrote: > > ping > > > > > > On 03/08/2021 12:00, Li, Zhijian wrote: > >> ping > >> > >> Any body could help to review/queue this patch ? > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2021/6/29 22:05, Igor Mammedov wrote: > >>> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:04:15 +0800 > >>> Li Zhijian wrote: > >>> > Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian > >>> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov > >>> > --- > hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 12 ++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > index e3d5fe19392..ff317263e85 100644 > --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > @@ -355,10 +355,10 @@ nvdimm_build_structure_caps(GArray *structures, > uint32_t capabilities) > static GArray *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) > { > - GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); > + GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); > GArray *structures = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */, 1); > - for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { > + for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = > device_list->next) { > DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; > /* build System Physical Address Range Structure. */ > @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static GArray > *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) > /* build NVDIMM Control Region Structure. */ > nvdimm_build_structure_dcr(structures, dev); > } > - g_slist_free(device_list); > + g_slist_free(list); > if (state->persistence) { > nvdimm_build_structure_caps(structures, state->persistence); > @@ -1339,9 +1339,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GArray > *table_offsets, GArray *table_data, > void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) > { > - GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); > + GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); > - for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { > + for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = > device_list->next) { > AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem = NULL; > DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; > Object *obj = OBJECT(dev); > @@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) > build_srat_memory(numamem, addr, size, node, > MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED | > MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE); > } > - g_slist_free(device_list); > + g_slist_free(list); > } > void nvdimm_build_acpi(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data, > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >
Re: [PATCH] nvdimm: release the correct device list
ping again On 30/08/2021 09:04, Li Zhijian wrote: > ping > > > On 03/08/2021 12:00, Li, Zhijian wrote: >> ping >> >> Any body could help to review/queue this patch ? >> >> >> >> On 2021/6/29 22:05, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:04:15 +0800 >>> Li Zhijian wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian >>> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov >>> --- hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c index e3d5fe19392..ff317263e85 100644 --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c @@ -355,10 +355,10 @@ nvdimm_build_structure_caps(GArray *structures, uint32_t capabilities) static GArray *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) { - GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); + GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); GArray *structures = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */, 1); - for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { + for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; /* build System Physical Address Range Structure. */ @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static GArray *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) /* build NVDIMM Control Region Structure. */ nvdimm_build_structure_dcr(structures, dev); } - g_slist_free(device_list); + g_slist_free(list); if (state->persistence) { nvdimm_build_structure_caps(structures, state->persistence); @@ -1339,9 +1339,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data, void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) { - GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); + GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); - for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { + for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem = NULL; DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; Object *obj = OBJECT(dev); @@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) build_srat_memory(numamem, addr, size, node, MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED | MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE); } - g_slist_free(device_list); + g_slist_free(list); } void nvdimm_build_acpi(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data, >>> >>> >> >> >> >
Re: [PATCH] nvdimm: release the correct device list
ping On 03/08/2021 12:00, Li, Zhijian wrote: > ping > > Any body could help to review/queue this patch ? > > > > On 2021/6/29 22:05, Igor Mammedov wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:04:15 +0800 >> Li Zhijian wrote: >> >>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian >> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov >> >>> --- >>> hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 12 ++-- >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c >>> index e3d5fe19392..ff317263e85 100644 >>> --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c >>> +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c >>> @@ -355,10 +355,10 @@ nvdimm_build_structure_caps(GArray *structures, >>> uint32_t capabilities) >>> static GArray *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) >>> { >>> - GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); >>> + GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); >>> GArray *structures = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */, 1); >>> - for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { >>> + for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) >>> { >>> DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; >>> /* build System Physical Address Range Structure. */ >>> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static GArray >>> *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) >>> /* build NVDIMM Control Region Structure. */ >>> nvdimm_build_structure_dcr(structures, dev); >>> } >>> - g_slist_free(device_list); >>> + g_slist_free(list); >>> if (state->persistence) { >>> nvdimm_build_structure_caps(structures, state->persistence); >>> @@ -1339,9 +1339,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GArray *table_offsets, >>> GArray *table_data, >>> void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) >>> { >>> - GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); >>> + GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); >>> - for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { >>> + for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) >>> { >>> AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem = NULL; >>> DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; >>> Object *obj = OBJECT(dev); >>> @@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) >>> build_srat_memory(numamem, addr, size, node, >>> MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED | >>> MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE); >>> } >>> - g_slist_free(device_list); >>> + g_slist_free(list); >>> } >>> void nvdimm_build_acpi(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data, >> >> > > >
Re: [PATCH] nvdimm: release the correct device list
ping Any body could help to review/queue this patch ? On 2021/6/29 22:05, Igor Mammedov wrote: On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:04:15 +0800 Li Zhijian wrote: Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov --- hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c index e3d5fe19392..ff317263e85 100644 --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c @@ -355,10 +355,10 @@ nvdimm_build_structure_caps(GArray *structures, uint32_t capabilities) static GArray *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) { -GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); +GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); GArray *structures = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */, 1); -for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { +for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; /* build System Physical Address Range Structure. */ @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static GArray *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) /* build NVDIMM Control Region Structure. */ nvdimm_build_structure_dcr(structures, dev); } -g_slist_free(device_list); +g_slist_free(list); if (state->persistence) { nvdimm_build_structure_caps(structures, state->persistence); @@ -1339,9 +1339,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data, void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) { -GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); +GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); -for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { +for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem = NULL; DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; Object *obj = OBJECT(dev); @@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) build_srat_memory(numamem, addr, size, node, MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED | MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE); } -g_slist_free(device_list); +g_slist_free(list); } void nvdimm_build_acpi(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data,
Re: [PATCH] nvdimm: release the correct device list
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:04:15 +0800 Li Zhijian wrote: > Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov > --- > hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 12 ++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > index e3d5fe19392..ff317263e85 100644 > --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > @@ -355,10 +355,10 @@ nvdimm_build_structure_caps(GArray *structures, > uint32_t capabilities) > > static GArray *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) > { > -GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); > +GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); > GArray *structures = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */, 1); > > -for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { > +for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { > DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; > > /* build System Physical Address Range Structure. */ > @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static GArray *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState > *state) > /* build NVDIMM Control Region Structure. */ > nvdimm_build_structure_dcr(structures, dev); > } > -g_slist_free(device_list); > +g_slist_free(list); > > if (state->persistence) { > nvdimm_build_structure_caps(structures, state->persistence); > @@ -1339,9 +1339,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GArray *table_offsets, > GArray *table_data, > > void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) > { > -GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); > +GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); > > -for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { > +for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { > AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem = NULL; > DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; > Object *obj = OBJECT(dev); > @@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) > build_srat_memory(numamem, addr, size, node, >MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED | MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE); > } > -g_slist_free(device_list); > +g_slist_free(list); > } > > void nvdimm_build_acpi(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data,
[PATCH] nvdimm: release the correct device list
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian --- hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c index e3d5fe19392..ff317263e85 100644 --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c @@ -355,10 +355,10 @@ nvdimm_build_structure_caps(GArray *structures, uint32_t capabilities) static GArray *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) { -GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); +GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); GArray *structures = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */, 1); -for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { +for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; /* build System Physical Address Range Structure. */ @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static GArray *nvdimm_build_device_structure(NVDIMMState *state) /* build NVDIMM Control Region Structure. */ nvdimm_build_structure_dcr(structures, dev); } -g_slist_free(device_list); +g_slist_free(list); if (state->persistence) { nvdimm_build_structure_caps(structures, state->persistence); @@ -1339,9 +1339,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data, void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) { -GSList *device_list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); +GSList *device_list, *list = nvdimm_get_device_list(); -for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { +for (device_list = list; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) { AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem = NULL; DeviceState *dev = device_list->data; Object *obj = OBJECT(dev); @@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ void nvdimm_build_srat(GArray *table_data) build_srat_memory(numamem, addr, size, node, MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED | MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE); } -g_slist_free(device_list); +g_slist_free(list); } void nvdimm_build_acpi(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data, -- 2.31.1