Re: [PATCH 05/10] Optimize the function of packet_new

2021-01-20 Thread Lukas Straub
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:46:30 +0800
leirao  wrote:

> From: "Rao, Lei" 
> 
> if we put the data copy outside the packet_new(), then for the
> filter-rewrite module, there will be one less memory copy in the
> processing of each network packet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lei Rao 

Looks good to me,

Reviewed-by: Lukas Straub 

> ---
>  net/colo-compare.c| 7 +--
>  net/colo.c| 4 ++--
>  net/colo.h| 2 +-
>  net/filter-rewriter.c | 1 -
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
> index 9e18baa..8bdf5a8 100644
> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
> @@ -247,14 +247,17 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode, 
> Connection **con)
>  ConnectionKey key;
>  Packet *pkt = NULL;
>  Connection *conn;
> +char *data = NULL;
>  int ret;
>  
>  if (mode == PRIMARY_IN) {
> -pkt = packet_new(s->pri_rs.buf,
> +data = g_memdup(s->pri_rs.buf, s->pri_rs.packet_len);
> +pkt = packet_new(data,
>   s->pri_rs.packet_len,
>   s->pri_rs.vnet_hdr_len);
>  } else {
> -pkt = packet_new(s->sec_rs.buf,
> +data = g_memdup(s->sec_rs.buf, s->sec_rs.packet_len);
> +pkt = packet_new(data,
>   s->sec_rs.packet_len,
>   s->sec_rs.vnet_hdr_len);
>  }
> diff --git a/net/colo.c b/net/colo.c
> index ef00609..08fb37e 100644
> --- a/net/colo.c
> +++ b/net/colo.c
> @@ -155,11 +155,11 @@ void connection_destroy(void *opaque)
>  g_slice_free(Connection, conn);
>  }
>  
> -Packet *packet_new(const void *data, int size, int vnet_hdr_len)
> +Packet *packet_new(void *data, int size, int vnet_hdr_len)
>  {
>  Packet *pkt = g_slice_new(Packet);
>  
> -pkt->data = g_memdup(data, size);
> +pkt->data = data;
>  pkt->size = size;
>  pkt->creation_ms = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_HOST);
>  pkt->vnet_hdr_len = vnet_hdr_len;
> diff --git a/net/colo.h b/net/colo.h
> index 573ab91..bd2d719 100644
> --- a/net/colo.h
> +++ b/net/colo.h
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ Connection *connection_get(GHashTable 
> *connection_track_table,
>  bool connection_has_tracked(GHashTable *connection_track_table,
>  ConnectionKey *key);
>  void connection_hashtable_reset(GHashTable *connection_track_table);
> -Packet *packet_new(const void *data, int size, int vnet_hdr_len);
> +Packet *packet_new(void *data, int size, int vnet_hdr_len);
>  void packet_destroy(void *opaque, void *user_data);
>  void packet_destroy_partial(void *opaque, void *user_data);
>  
> diff --git a/net/filter-rewriter.c b/net/filter-rewriter.c
> index fc0e64c..e24afe5 100644
> --- a/net/filter-rewriter.c
> +++ b/net/filter-rewriter.c
> @@ -271,7 +271,6 @@ static ssize_t colo_rewriter_receive_iov(NetFilterState 
> *nf,
>  }
>  
>  pkt = packet_new(buf, size, vnet_hdr_len);
> -g_free(buf);
>  
>  /*
>   * if we get tcp packet



-- 



pgpDqAFWtwpKh.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[PATCH 05/10] Optimize the function of packet_new

2021-01-12 Thread leirao
From: "Rao, Lei" 

if we put the data copy outside the packet_new(), then for the
filter-rewrite module, there will be one less memory copy in the
processing of each network packet.

Signed-off-by: Lei Rao 
---
 net/colo-compare.c| 7 +--
 net/colo.c| 4 ++--
 net/colo.h| 2 +-
 net/filter-rewriter.c | 1 -
 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
index 9e18baa..8bdf5a8 100644
--- a/net/colo-compare.c
+++ b/net/colo-compare.c
@@ -247,14 +247,17 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode, 
Connection **con)
 ConnectionKey key;
 Packet *pkt = NULL;
 Connection *conn;
+char *data = NULL;
 int ret;
 
 if (mode == PRIMARY_IN) {
-pkt = packet_new(s->pri_rs.buf,
+data = g_memdup(s->pri_rs.buf, s->pri_rs.packet_len);
+pkt = packet_new(data,
  s->pri_rs.packet_len,
  s->pri_rs.vnet_hdr_len);
 } else {
-pkt = packet_new(s->sec_rs.buf,
+data = g_memdup(s->sec_rs.buf, s->sec_rs.packet_len);
+pkt = packet_new(data,
  s->sec_rs.packet_len,
  s->sec_rs.vnet_hdr_len);
 }
diff --git a/net/colo.c b/net/colo.c
index ef00609..08fb37e 100644
--- a/net/colo.c
+++ b/net/colo.c
@@ -155,11 +155,11 @@ void connection_destroy(void *opaque)
 g_slice_free(Connection, conn);
 }
 
-Packet *packet_new(const void *data, int size, int vnet_hdr_len)
+Packet *packet_new(void *data, int size, int vnet_hdr_len)
 {
 Packet *pkt = g_slice_new(Packet);
 
-pkt->data = g_memdup(data, size);
+pkt->data = data;
 pkt->size = size;
 pkt->creation_ms = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_HOST);
 pkt->vnet_hdr_len = vnet_hdr_len;
diff --git a/net/colo.h b/net/colo.h
index 573ab91..bd2d719 100644
--- a/net/colo.h
+++ b/net/colo.h
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ Connection *connection_get(GHashTable 
*connection_track_table,
 bool connection_has_tracked(GHashTable *connection_track_table,
 ConnectionKey *key);
 void connection_hashtable_reset(GHashTable *connection_track_table);
-Packet *packet_new(const void *data, int size, int vnet_hdr_len);
+Packet *packet_new(void *data, int size, int vnet_hdr_len);
 void packet_destroy(void *opaque, void *user_data);
 void packet_destroy_partial(void *opaque, void *user_data);
 
diff --git a/net/filter-rewriter.c b/net/filter-rewriter.c
index fc0e64c..e24afe5 100644
--- a/net/filter-rewriter.c
+++ b/net/filter-rewriter.c
@@ -271,7 +271,6 @@ static ssize_t colo_rewriter_receive_iov(NetFilterState *nf,
 }
 
 pkt = packet_new(buf, size, vnet_hdr_len);
-g_free(buf);
 
 /*
  * if we get tcp packet
-- 
1.8.3.1