Re: [PATCH 13/20] target/riscv/kvm: refactor kvm_riscv_init_user_properties()

2023-08-31 Thread Andrew Jones
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:08:46AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> The function is doing way more than just init user properties. We would
> also like to use the 'user_extension_properties' class property, as the
> TCG driver is already using, to decide whether KVM should expose user
> properties or not.
> 
> Rename kvm_riscv_init_user_properties() to riscv_init_kvm_registers()
> and leave only the essential, non-optional KVM init functions there. All
> functions that deals with property handling is now gated via
> rcc->user_extension_properties.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza 
> ---
>  target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 19 +++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> index 3c4fa43cee..85e8b0a927 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> @@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(RISCVCPU *cpu, 
> KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
>  }
>  }
>  
> -static void riscv_init_user_properties(Object *cpu_obj)
> +static void riscv_init_kvm_registers(Object *cpu_obj)
>  {
>  RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(cpu_obj);
>  KVMScratchCPU kvmcpu;
> @@ -801,7 +801,6 @@ static void riscv_init_user_properties(Object *cpu_obj)
>  return;
>  }
>  
> -kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties(cpu_obj);
>  kvm_riscv_init_machine_ids(cpu, );
>  kvm_riscv_init_misa_ext_mask(cpu, );
>  kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(cpu, );
> @@ -1295,16 +1294,20 @@ DEFINE_TYPES(riscv_kvm_cpu_type_infos)
>  static void kvm_cpu_instance_init(CPUState *cs)
>  {
>  Object *obj = OBJECT(RISCV_CPU(cs));
> +RISCVCPUClass *rcc = RISCV_CPU_GET_CLASS(obj);
>  DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
>  
> -riscv_init_user_properties(obj);
> +riscv_init_kvm_registers(obj);
>  
> -riscv_add_satp_mode_properties(obj);
> -riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
> +if (rcc->user_extension_properties) {
> +kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties(obj);
> +riscv_add_satp_mode_properties(obj);
> +riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
>  
> -riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
> -riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
> -riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
> +riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
> +riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
> +riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, 
> riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
> +}
>  
>  for (Property *prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
>  /* Check if we have a specific KVM handler for the option */
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 
>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones 



[PATCH 13/20] target/riscv/kvm: refactor kvm_riscv_init_user_properties()

2023-08-25 Thread Daniel Henrique Barboza
The function is doing way more than just init user properties. We would
also like to use the 'user_extension_properties' class property, as the
TCG driver is already using, to decide whether KVM should expose user
properties or not.

Rename kvm_riscv_init_user_properties() to riscv_init_kvm_registers()
and leave only the essential, non-optional KVM init functions there. All
functions that deals with property handling is now gated via
rcc->user_extension_properties.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza 
---
 target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 19 +++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
index 3c4fa43cee..85e8b0a927 100644
--- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(RISCVCPU *cpu, 
KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
 }
 }
 
-static void riscv_init_user_properties(Object *cpu_obj)
+static void riscv_init_kvm_registers(Object *cpu_obj)
 {
 RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(cpu_obj);
 KVMScratchCPU kvmcpu;
@@ -801,7 +801,6 @@ static void riscv_init_user_properties(Object *cpu_obj)
 return;
 }
 
-kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties(cpu_obj);
 kvm_riscv_init_machine_ids(cpu, );
 kvm_riscv_init_misa_ext_mask(cpu, );
 kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(cpu, );
@@ -1295,16 +1294,20 @@ DEFINE_TYPES(riscv_kvm_cpu_type_infos)
 static void kvm_cpu_instance_init(CPUState *cs)
 {
 Object *obj = OBJECT(RISCV_CPU(cs));
+RISCVCPUClass *rcc = RISCV_CPU_GET_CLASS(obj);
 DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
 
-riscv_init_user_properties(obj);
+riscv_init_kvm_registers(obj);
 
-riscv_add_satp_mode_properties(obj);
-riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
+if (rcc->user_extension_properties) {
+kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties(obj);
+riscv_add_satp_mode_properties(obj);
+riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
 
-riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
-riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
-riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
+riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
+riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
+riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
+}
 
 for (Property *prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
 /* Check if we have a specific KVM handler for the option */
-- 
2.41.0