* Vivek Goyal (vgo...@redhat.com) wrote:
> In virtio_send_data_iov() we are checking first for short read and then
> EOF condition. Change the order. Basically check for error and EOF first
> and last remaining piece is short ready which will lead to retry
> automatically at the end of while loop.
>
> Just that it is little simpler to read to the code. There is no need
> to call "continue" and also one less call of "len-=ret".
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> ---
> tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 21 ++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> index 434fe401cf..aa53808ef9 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> @@ -410,25 +410,24 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se,
> struct fuse_chan *ch,
> __func__, len);
> goto err;
> }
> -fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: preadv ret=%d len=%zd\n", __func__,
> - ret, len);
> -if (ret < len && ret) {
> -fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: ret < len\n", __func__);
> -/* Skip over this much next time around */
> -iov_discard_front(_sg_ptr, _sg_cpy_count, ret);
> -buf->buf[0].pos += ret;
> -len -= ret;
>
> -/* Lets do another read */
> -continue;
> -}
> if (!ret) {
> /* EOF case? */
> fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: !ret len remaining=%zd\n",
> __func__,
> len);
> break;
> }
> +fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: preadv ret=%d len=%zd\n", __func__,
> + ret, len);
> +
> len -= ret;
> +/* Short read. Retry reading remaining bytes */
> +if (len) {
> +fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: ret < len\n", __func__);
> +/* Skip over this much next time around */
> +iov_discard_front(_sg_ptr, _sg_cpy_count, ret);
> +buf->buf[0].pos += ret;
> +}
> } while (len);
>
> /* Need to fix out->len on EOF */
> --
> 2.25.4
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
