Re: for 4.2 ??? Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] block/nbd: fix memory leak in nbd_open()
On 2019/12/4 2:54, Eric Blake wrote: > On 12/3/19 11:52 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: >> It's just a memory leak, but it's a regression in 4.2. >> >> Should we take it into 4.2? > > Sorry, I was on holiday and then jury service, so I missed any chance at > getting this into -rc3. The memory leak only happens on failure, and > you'd have to be pretty desperate to purposefully attempt to open a lot > of NBD devices where you know you'll get a failure just to trigger > enough of a leak to cause the OOM-killer to target qemu. So I'm fine if > this is deferred to 5.0, and just cc's qemu-stable (now done). > > I'll queue this through my NBD tree for 5.0. > >> >> >> 29.11.2019 10:25, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote: >>> From: PanNengyuan > >>> >>> Reported-by: Euler Robot >>> Signed-off-by: PanNengyuan > > I'm not one to tell you that your name is written incorrectly, but it > does look odd to have a single word rather than a space between two > capitalized portions. If that's really how you want your S-o-b and > authorship to appear, I'm happy to preserve it; but you may want to > consider updating your git settings, and posting a v4 with an updated > spelling if you would prefer something different. (It is also > acceptable to use UTF-8 characters; some people like listing an S-o-b in > both native characters and a Westernized variant). > Thanks for your advice, I will update my git settings. >> >> May add: >> >> Fixes: 8f071c9db506e03ab > > Yes, information like that helps in deciding how long the problem has > been present (in this case, it is indeed a regression added in 4.2, even > if minor in nature). > ok, I will add it next time.
Re: for 4.2 ??? Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] block/nbd: fix memory leak in nbd_open()
On 12/3/19 12:54 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 12/3/19 11:52 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: It's just a memory leak, but it's a regression in 4.2. Should we take it into 4.2? Sorry, I was on holiday and then jury service, so I missed any chance at getting this into -rc3. The memory leak only happens on failure, and you'd have to be pretty desperate to purposefully attempt to open a lot of NBD devices where you know you'll get a failure just to trigger enough of a leak to cause the OOM-killer to target qemu. So I'm fine if this is deferred to 5.0, and just cc's qemu-stable (now done). I'll queue this through my NBD tree for 5.0. Actually, given the review comments on 1/2, we'll probably be better off with a v4 for the series. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Re: for 4.2 ??? Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] block/nbd: fix memory leak in nbd_open()
On 12/3/19 11:52 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: It's just a memory leak, but it's a regression in 4.2. Should we take it into 4.2? Sorry, I was on holiday and then jury service, so I missed any chance at getting this into -rc3. The memory leak only happens on failure, and you'd have to be pretty desperate to purposefully attempt to open a lot of NBD devices where you know you'll get a failure just to trigger enough of a leak to cause the OOM-killer to target qemu. So I'm fine if this is deferred to 5.0, and just cc's qemu-stable (now done). I'll queue this through my NBD tree for 5.0. 29.11.2019 10:25, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote: From: PanNengyuan Reported-by: Euler Robot Signed-off-by: PanNengyuan I'm not one to tell you that your name is written incorrectly, but it does look odd to have a single word rather than a space between two capitalized portions. If that's really how you want your S-o-b and authorship to appear, I'm happy to preserve it; but you may want to consider updating your git settings, and posting a v4 with an updated spelling if you would prefer something different. (It is also acceptable to use UTF-8 characters; some people like listing an S-o-b in both native characters and a Westernized variant). May add: Fixes: 8f071c9db506e03ab Yes, information like that helps in deciding how long the problem has been present (in this case, it is indeed a regression added in 4.2, even if minor in nature). -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
for 4.2 ??? Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] block/nbd: fix memory leak in nbd_open()
It's just a memory leak, but it's a regression in 4.2.
Should we take it into 4.2?
29.11.2019 10:25, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: PanNengyuan
>
> In currently implementation there will be a memory leak when
> nbd_client_connect() returns error status. Here is an easy way to
> reproduce:
>
> 1. run qemu-iotests as follow and check the result with asan:
> ./check -raw 143
>
> Following is the asan output backtrack:
> Direct leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
> #0 0x7f629688a560 in calloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.3+0xc7560)
> #1 0x7f6295e7e015 in g_malloc0 (/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x50015)
> #2 0x56281dab4642 in qobject_input_start_struct
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/qapi/qobject-input-visitor.c:295
> #3 0x56281dab1a04 in visit_start_struct
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/qapi/qapi-visit-core.c:49
> #4 0x56281dad1827 in visit_type_SocketAddress
> qapi/qapi-visit-sockets.c:386
> #5 0x56281da8062f in nbd_config
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1716
> #6 0x56281da8062f in nbd_process_options
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1829
> #7 0x56281da8062f in nbd_open /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1873
>
> Direct leak of 15 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
> #0 0x7f629688a3a0 in malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.3+0xc73a0)
> #1 0x7f6295e7dfbd in g_malloc (/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x4ffbd)
> #2 0x7f6295e96ace in g_strdup (/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x68ace)
> #3 0x56281da804ac in nbd_process_options
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1834
> #4 0x56281da804ac in nbd_open /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1873
>
> Indirect leak of 24 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
> #0 0x7f629688a3a0 in malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.3+0xc73a0)
> #1 0x7f6295e7dfbd in g_malloc (/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x4ffbd)
> #2 0x7f6295e96ace in g_strdup (/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x68ace)
> #3 0x56281dab41a3 in qobject_input_type_str_keyval
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/qapi/qobject-input-visitor.c:536
> #4 0x56281dab2ee9 in visit_type_str
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/qapi/qapi-visit-core.c:297
> #5 0x56281dad0fa1 in visit_type_UnixSocketAddress_members
> qapi/qapi-visit-sockets.c:141
> #6 0x56281dad17b6 in visit_type_SocketAddress_members
> qapi/qapi-visit-sockets.c:366
> #7 0x56281dad186a in visit_type_SocketAddress
> qapi/qapi-visit-sockets.c:393
> #8 0x56281da8062f in nbd_config /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1716
> #9 0x56281da8062f in nbd_process_options
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1829
> #10 0x56281da8062f in nbd_open /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1873
>
> Reported-by: Euler Robot
> Signed-off-by: PanNengyuan
May add:
Fixes: 8f071c9db506e03ab
(I found it just by git log -p, could you please check it by your reproduce?)
Ohh, that's my commit, I'm sorry. If you discovered this commit by yourself,
and added Fixes: tag and myself to CC, I'd have reviewed it a lot earlier..
> ---
> Changes v2 to v1:
> - add a new function to do the common cleanups (suggested by Stefano
>Garzarella).
> ---
> Changes v3 to v2:
> - split in two patches(suggested by Stefano Garzarella)
> ---
> block/nbd.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
> index 5805979..09d6925 100644
> --- a/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/block/nbd.c
> @@ -1889,6 +1889,7 @@ static int nbd_open(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict
> *options, int flags,
>
> ret = nbd_client_connect(bs, errp);
> if (ret < 0) {
> +nbd_free_bdrvstate_prop(s);
> return ret;
> }
> /* successfully connected */
>
Thanks for fixing!
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
[PATCH V3 2/2] block/nbd: fix memory leak in nbd_open()
From: PanNengyuan
In currently implementation there will be a memory leak when
nbd_client_connect() returns error status. Here is an easy way to
reproduce:
1. run qemu-iotests as follow and check the result with asan:
./check -raw 143
Following is the asan output backtrack:
Direct leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f629688a560 in calloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.3+0xc7560)
#1 0x7f6295e7e015 in g_malloc0 (/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x50015)
#2 0x56281dab4642 in qobject_input_start_struct
/mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/qapi/qobject-input-visitor.c:295
#3 0x56281dab1a04 in visit_start_struct
/mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/qapi/qapi-visit-core.c:49
#4 0x56281dad1827 in visit_type_SocketAddress qapi/qapi-visit-sockets.c:386
#5 0x56281da8062f in nbd_config /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1716
#6 0x56281da8062f in nbd_process_options
/mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1829
#7 0x56281da8062f in nbd_open /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1873
Direct leak of 15 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f629688a3a0 in malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.3+0xc73a0)
#1 0x7f6295e7dfbd in g_malloc (/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x4ffbd)
#2 0x7f6295e96ace in g_strdup (/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x68ace)
#3 0x56281da804ac in nbd_process_options
/mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1834
#4 0x56281da804ac in nbd_open /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1873
Indirect leak of 24 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f629688a3a0 in malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.3+0xc73a0)
#1 0x7f6295e7dfbd in g_malloc (/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x4ffbd)
#2 0x7f6295e96ace in g_strdup (/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x68ace)
#3 0x56281dab41a3 in qobject_input_type_str_keyval
/mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/qapi/qobject-input-visitor.c:536
#4 0x56281dab2ee9 in visit_type_str
/mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/qapi/qapi-visit-core.c:297
#5 0x56281dad0fa1 in visit_type_UnixSocketAddress_members
qapi/qapi-visit-sockets.c:141
#6 0x56281dad17b6 in visit_type_SocketAddress_members
qapi/qapi-visit-sockets.c:366
#7 0x56281dad186a in visit_type_SocketAddress qapi/qapi-visit-sockets.c:393
#8 0x56281da8062f in nbd_config /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1716
#9 0x56281da8062f in nbd_process_options
/mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1829
#10 0x56281da8062f in nbd_open /mnt/sdb/qemu-4.2.0-rc0/block/nbd.c:1873
Reported-by: Euler Robot
Signed-off-by: PanNengyuan
---
Changes v2 to v1:
- add a new function to do the common cleanups (suggested by Stefano
Garzarella).
---
Changes v3 to v2:
- split in two patches(suggested by Stefano Garzarella)
---
block/nbd.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
index 5805979..09d6925 100644
--- a/block/nbd.c
+++ b/block/nbd.c
@@ -1889,6 +1889,7 @@ static int nbd_open(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict *options,
int flags,
ret = nbd_client_connect(bs, errp);
if (ret < 0) {
+nbd_free_bdrvstate_prop(s);
return ret;
}
/* successfully connected */
--
2.7.2.windows.1
