Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] s390x: sclp: refactor invalid command check
On 27.09.19 15:33, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: > From: Janosch Frank > > Invalid command checking has to be done before the boundary check, > refactoring it now allows to insert the boundary check at the correct > place later. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank > Reviewed-by: Jason J. Herne > --- > hw/s390x/event-facility.c | 3 --- > hw/s390x/sclp.c | 17 - > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c > index 797ecbb..6620569 100644 > --- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c > +++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c > @@ -377,9 +377,6 @@ static void command_handler(SCLPEventFacility *ef, SCCB > *sccb, uint64_t code) > case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK: > write_event_mask(ef, sccb); > break; > -default: > -sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND); > -break; > } > } > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c > index fac7c3b..95ebfe7 100644 > --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c > +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c > @@ -219,8 +219,23 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, > uint32_t code) > goto out; > } > > -sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code); > +switch (code & SCLP_CMD_CODE_MASK) { > +case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO: > +case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED: > +case SCLP_CMDW_READ_CPU_INFO: > +case SCLP_CMDW_CONFIGURE_IOA: > +case SCLP_CMDW_DECONFIGURE_IOA: > +case SCLP_CMD_READ_EVENT_DATA: > +case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA: > +case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK: > +break; > +default: > +work_sccb.h.response_code = > cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND); > +goto out_write; > +} > > +sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code); > +out_write: > cpu_physical_memory_write(sccb, &work_sccb, >be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length)); > Thanks applied.
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] s390x: sclp: refactor invalid command check
On 27.09.19 15:33, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: > From: Janosch Frank > > Invalid command checking has to be done before the boundary check, > refactoring it now allows to insert the boundary check at the correct > place later. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank > Reviewed-by: Jason J. Herne > --- > hw/s390x/event-facility.c | 3 --- > hw/s390x/sclp.c | 17 - > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c > index 797ecbb..6620569 100644 > --- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c > +++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c > @@ -377,9 +377,6 @@ static void command_handler(SCLPEventFacility *ef, SCCB > *sccb, uint64_t code) > case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK: > write_event_mask(ef, sccb); > break; > -default: > -sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND); > -break; > } > } > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c > index fac7c3b..95ebfe7 100644 > --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c > +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c > @@ -219,8 +219,23 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, > uint32_t code) > goto out; > } > > -sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code); > +switch (code & SCLP_CMD_CODE_MASK) { > +case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO: > +case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED: > +case SCLP_CMDW_READ_CPU_INFO: > +case SCLP_CMDW_CONFIGURE_IOA: > +case SCLP_CMDW_DECONFIGURE_IOA: > +case SCLP_CMD_READ_EVENT_DATA: > +case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA: > +case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK: > +break; > +default: > +work_sccb.h.response_code = > cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND); > +goto out_write; > +} > > +sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code); > +out_write: > cpu_physical_memory_write(sccb, &work_sccb, >be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length)); > > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
[PATCH v2 1/4] s390x: sclp: refactor invalid command check
From: Janosch Frank Invalid command checking has to be done before the boundary check, refactoring it now allows to insert the boundary check at the correct place later. Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank Reviewed-by: Jason J. Herne --- hw/s390x/event-facility.c | 3 --- hw/s390x/sclp.c | 17 - 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c index 797ecbb..6620569 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c +++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c @@ -377,9 +377,6 @@ static void command_handler(SCLPEventFacility *ef, SCCB *sccb, uint64_t code) case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK: write_event_mask(ef, sccb); break; -default: -sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND); -break; } } diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c index fac7c3b..95ebfe7 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c @@ -219,8 +219,23 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code) goto out; } -sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code); +switch (code & SCLP_CMD_CODE_MASK) { +case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO: +case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED: +case SCLP_CMDW_READ_CPU_INFO: +case SCLP_CMDW_CONFIGURE_IOA: +case SCLP_CMDW_DECONFIGURE_IOA: +case SCLP_CMD_READ_EVENT_DATA: +case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA: +case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK: +break; +default: +work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND); +goto out_write; +} +sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code); +out_write: cpu_physical_memory_write(sccb, &work_sccb, be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length)); -- 2.7.4