Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] target/riscv: rvk: expose zbk* and zk* properties
在 2022/1/18 下午12:23, Alistair Francis 写道: On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 1:53 PM Weiwei Li wrote: Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang --- target/riscv/cpu.c | 14 ++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c index b487a8282c..628a782ba9 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c @@ -694,9 +694,23 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_properties[] = { DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zba", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zba, true), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbb, true), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbc, true), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbkb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbkb, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbkc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbkc, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbkx", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbkx, false), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbs", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbs, true), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zk", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zk, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkn", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkn, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zknd", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zknd, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkne", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkne, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zknh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zknh, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkr", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkr, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zks", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zks, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zksed", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zksed, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zksh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zksh, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkt", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkt, false), /* These are experimental so mark with 'x-' */ +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-h", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_h, false), Looks like a rebase error Alistair Yeah. I'll fix this. Regards, Weiwei Li DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-j", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_j, false), /* ePMP 0.9.3 */ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-epmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.epmp, false), -- 2.17.1
Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] target/riscv: rvk: expose zbk* and zk* properties
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 1:53 PM Weiwei Li wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li > Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang > --- > target/riscv/cpu.c | 14 ++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c > index b487a8282c..628a782ba9 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c > @@ -694,9 +694,23 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_properties[] = { > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zba", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zba, true), > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbb, true), > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbc, true), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbkb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbkb, false), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbkc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbkc, false), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbkx", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbkx, false), > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbs", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbs, true), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zk", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zk, false), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkn", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkn, false), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zknd", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zknd, false), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkne", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkne, false), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zknh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zknh, false), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkr", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkr, false), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zks", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zks, false), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zksed", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zksed, false), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zksh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zksh, false), > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkt", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkt, false), > > /* These are experimental so mark with 'x-' */ > +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-h", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_h, false), Looks like a rebase error Alistair > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-j", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_j, false), > /* ePMP 0.9.3 */ > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-epmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.epmp, false), > -- > 2.17.1 > >
[PATCH v4 7/7] target/riscv: rvk: expose zbk* and zk* properties
Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang --- target/riscv/cpu.c | 14 ++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c index b487a8282c..628a782ba9 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c @@ -694,9 +694,23 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_properties[] = { DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zba", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zba, true), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbb, true), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbc, true), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbkb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbkb, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbkc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbkc, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbkx", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbkx, false), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbs", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbs, true), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zk", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zk, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkn", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkn, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zknd", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zknd, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkne", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkne, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zknh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zknh, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkr", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkr, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zks", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zks, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zksed", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zksed, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zksh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zksh, false), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkt", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkt, false), /* These are experimental so mark with 'x-' */ +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-h", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_h, false), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-j", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_j, false), /* ePMP 0.9.3 */ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-epmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.epmp, false), -- 2.17.1