From: BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu>
The "2" in booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss() call corresponds to
MMU_INST_FETCH which is the value of access_type in this branch;
mmubooke206_esr() only checks for MMU_DATA_STORE and it's called from
code access so using MMU_DATA_LOAD here seems wrong so replace it with
access_type here as well that yields the same result. This also makes
these calls the same as the data access branch further down.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
---
target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
index f40481b4b1..6570b280ca 100644
--- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
+++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
@@ -1287,13 +1287,13 @@ static bool ppc_jumbo_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr
eaddr,
env->spr[SPR_40x_ESR] = 0x00000000;
break;
case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206:
- booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, 2, mmu_idx);
+ booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
/* fall through */
case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE:
cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ITLB;
env->error_code = 0;
env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
- env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx,
MMU_DATA_LOAD);
+ env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx,
access_type);
break;
case POWERPC_MMU_REAL:
cpu_abort(cs, "PowerPC in real mode should never raise "
--
2.43.0
