On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:55:46AM +0200, Kamal Heib wrote:
> The prints should indicate that we are talking about QP and not CQ.
>
> Fixes: 98d176f8e592 ("hw/rdma: PVRDMA commands and data-path ops")
> Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia
> Signed-off-by: Kamal Heib
> ---
> hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_cmd.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_cmd.c b/hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_cmd.c
> index 21a55e225a61..8bc24e952073 100644
> --- a/hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_cmd.c
> +++ b/hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_cmd.c
> @@ -374,13 +374,13 @@ static int create_qp_rings(PCIDevice *pci_dev, uint64_t
> pdir_dma,
>
> dir = rdma_pci_dma_map(pci_dev, pdir_dma, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
> if (!dir) {
> -rdma_error_report("Failed to map to CQ page directory");
> +rdma_error_report("Failed to map to QP page directory");
I guess it is based on latest patch-set, suggesting to specify it next
time.
> goto out;
> }
>
> tbl = rdma_pci_dma_map(pci_dev, dir[0], TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
> if (!tbl) {
> -rdma_error_report("Failed to map to CQ page table");
> +rdma_error_report("Failed to map to QP page table");
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int create_qp_rings(PCIDevice *pci_dev, uint64_t
> pdir_dma,
> sr->ring_state = (struct pvrdma_ring *)
> rdma_pci_dma_map(pci_dev, tbl[0], TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
> if (!sr->ring_state) {
> -rdma_error_report("Failed to map to CQ ring state");
> +rdma_error_report("Failed to map to QP ring state");
> goto out_free_sr_mem;
> }
>
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>