Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/18] bugfix: wrong error set by ram_control_load_hook()
On 08/23/2013 01:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 08/21/2013 06:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 21/08/2013 09:18, Lei Li ha scritto: It should set negative error value if there has been an error. Signed-off-by: Lei Li li...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- savevm.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/savevm.c b/savevm.c index 1522d95..f10e031 100644 --- a/savevm.c +++ b/savevm.c @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ void ram_control_after_iterate(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags) void ram_control_load_hook(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags) { -int ret = 0; +int ret = -1; -EINVAL OK, thanks. Can you extract the patches that I reviewed positively, plus this one, and send them separately? Sure, I will send it later. :) Thanks! Paolo -- Lei
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/18] bugfix: wrong error set by ram_control_load_hook()
On 08/21/2013 06:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 21/08/2013 09:18, Lei Li ha scritto: It should set negative error value if there has been an error. Signed-off-by: Lei Li li...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- savevm.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/savevm.c b/savevm.c index 1522d95..f10e031 100644 --- a/savevm.c +++ b/savevm.c @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ void ram_control_after_iterate(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags) void ram_control_load_hook(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags) { -int ret = 0; +int ret = -1; -EINVAL OK, thanks. otherwise looks good thanks! Paolo if (f-ops-hook_ram_load) { ret = f-ops-hook_ram_load(f, f-opaque, flags); -- Lei
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/18] bugfix: wrong error set by ram_control_load_hook()
On 08/21/2013 06:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 21/08/2013 09:18, Lei Li ha scritto: It should set negative error value if there has been an error. Signed-off-by: Lei Li li...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- savevm.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/savevm.c b/savevm.c index 1522d95..f10e031 100644 --- a/savevm.c +++ b/savevm.c @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ void ram_control_after_iterate(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags) void ram_control_load_hook(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags) { -int ret = 0; +int ret = -1; -EINVAL OK, thanks. Can you extract the patches that I reviewed positively, plus this one, and send them separately? Thanks! Paolo
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/18] bugfix: wrong error set by ram_control_load_hook()
It should set negative error value if there has been an error. Signed-off-by: Lei Li li...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- savevm.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/savevm.c b/savevm.c index 1522d95..f10e031 100644 --- a/savevm.c +++ b/savevm.c @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ void ram_control_after_iterate(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags) void ram_control_load_hook(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags) { -int ret = 0; +int ret = -1; if (f-ops-hook_ram_load) { ret = f-ops-hook_ram_load(f, f-opaque, flags); -- 1.7.7.6
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/18] bugfix: wrong error set by ram_control_load_hook()
Il 21/08/2013 09:18, Lei Li ha scritto: It should set negative error value if there has been an error. Signed-off-by: Lei Li li...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- savevm.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/savevm.c b/savevm.c index 1522d95..f10e031 100644 --- a/savevm.c +++ b/savevm.c @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ void ram_control_after_iterate(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags) void ram_control_load_hook(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags) { -int ret = 0; +int ret = -1; -EINVAL otherwise looks good thanks! Paolo if (f-ops-hook_ram_load) { ret = f-ops-hook_ram_load(f, f-opaque, flags);