On Tue, 04/10 20:39, Alex Bennée wrote:
> When calling our cross-compilation images we want to call something
> other than the default cc.
Makes sense to me!
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
> ---
> tests/docker/docker.py | 18 +++---
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/docker/docker.py b/tests/docker/docker.py
> index 8733266153..9444f4bea4 100755
> --- a/tests/docker/docker.py
> +++ b/tests/docker/docker.py
> @@ -397,6 +397,8 @@ class CcCommand(SubCommand):
> def args(self, parser):
> parser.add_argument("--image", "-i", required=True,
> help="The docker image in which to run cc")
> +parser.add_argument("--cc",
> +help="The compiler executable to call")
If add "default='cc'" to this call, we don't need the 'if args.cc' check below.
> parser.add_argument("--source-path", "-s", nargs="*", dest="paths",
> help="""Extra paths to (ro) mount into container
> for
> reading sources""")
> @@ -407,9 +409,19 @@ class CcCommand(SubCommand):
> cwd = os.getcwd()
> cmd = ["--rm", "-w", cwd,
> "-v", "%s:%s:rw" % (cwd, cwd)]
> -for p in args.paths:
> - cmd += ["-v", "%s:%s:ro,z" % (p, p)]
> -cmd += [args.image, "cc"]
> +
> +if args.paths:
> +for p in args.paths:
> +cmd += ["-v", "%s:%s:ro,z" % (p, p)]
I'm not sure the introduction of this if condition belongs to this patch, or is
necessary at all. Could you confirm?
Thanks.
Fam
> +
> +cmd += [args.image]
> +
> +# The compile command we are running
> +if args.cc:
> +cmd += [args.cc]
> +else:
> +cmd += ["cc"]
> +
> cmd += argv
> return Docker().command("run", cmd, True)
>
> --
> 2.16.2
>