[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm/pci-assign: 64 bits bar emulation

2012-12-19 Thread Xudong Hao
Enable 64 bits bar emulation.

v2 changes from v1:
- Change 0lx% to 0x%016 when print a 64 bit variable.

Test pass with the current seabios which already support 64bit pci bars.

Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao 
---
 hw/kvm/pci-assign.c |   22 ++
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
index 7a0998c..fb58ca9 100644
--- a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
+++ b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
 #define IORESOURCE_IRQ  0x0400
 #define IORESOURCE_DMA  0x0800
 #define IORESOURCE_PREFETCH 0x2000  /* No side effects */
+#define IORESOURCE_MEM_64   0x0010
 
 //#define DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT_DEBUG
 
@@ -442,9 +443,13 @@ static int assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion 
*io_regions,
 
 /* handle memory io regions */
 if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
-int t = cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH
-? PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH
-: PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
+int t = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
+if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) {
+t |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH;
+}
+if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM_64) {
+t |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64;
+}
 
 /* map physical memory */
 pci_dev->v_addrs[i].u.r_virtbase = mmap(NULL, cur_region->size,
@@ -468,10 +473,10 @@ static int assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion 
*io_regions,
 (cur_region->base_addr & 0xFFF);
 
 if (cur_region->size & 0xFFF) {
-error_report("PCI region %d at address 0x%" PRIx64 " has "
- "size 0x%" PRIx64 ", which is not a multiple of "
- "4K.  You might experience some performance hit "
- "due to that.",
+error_report("PCI region %d at address 0x%016" PRIx64 " has "
+ "size 0x%016" PRIx64 ", which is not a multiple "
+ "of 4K.  You might experience some performance "
+ "hit due to that.",
  i, cur_region->base_addr, cur_region->size);
 memory_region_init_io(&pci_dev->v_addrs[i].real_iomem,
   &slow_bar_ops, &pci_dev->v_addrs[i],
@@ -632,7 +637,8 @@ again:
 rp->valid = 0;
 rp->resource_fd = -1;
 size = end - start + 1;
-flags &= IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH;
+flags &= IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH
+ | IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
 if (size == 0 || (flags & ~IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) == 0) {
 continue;
 }
-- 
1.5.5




Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm/pci-assign: 64 bits bar emulation

2012-12-19 Thread Alex Williamson
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:47 +0800, Xudong Hao wrote:
> Enable 64 bits bar emulation.
> 
> v2 changes from v1:
> - Change 0lx% to 0x%016 when print a 64 bit variable.
> 
> Test pass with the current seabios which already support 64bit pci bars.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao 
> ---
>  hw/kvm/pci-assign.c |   22 ++
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
> index 7a0998c..fb58ca9 100644
> --- a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
> +++ b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
>  #define IORESOURCE_IRQ  0x0400
>  #define IORESOURCE_DMA  0x0800
>  #define IORESOURCE_PREFETCH 0x2000  /* No side effects */
> +#define IORESOURCE_MEM_64   0x0010
>  
>  //#define DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT_DEBUG
>  
> @@ -442,9 +443,13 @@ static int assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion 
> *io_regions,
>  
>  /* handle memory io regions */
>  if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
> -int t = cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH
> -? PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH
> -: PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
> +int t = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
> +if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) {
> +t |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH;
> +}
> +if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM_64) {
> +t |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64;
> +}
>  
>  /* map physical memory */
>  pci_dev->v_addrs[i].u.r_virtbase = mmap(NULL, cur_region->size,
> @@ -468,10 +473,10 @@ static int assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion 
> *io_regions,
>  (cur_region->base_addr & 0xFFF);
>  
>  if (cur_region->size & 0xFFF) {
> -error_report("PCI region %d at address 0x%" PRIx64 " has "
> - "size 0x%" PRIx64 ", which is not a multiple of 
> "
> - "4K.  You might experience some performance hit 
> "
> - "due to that.",
> +error_report("PCI region %d at address 0x%016" PRIx64 " has "
> + "size 0x%016" PRIx64 ", which is not a multiple 
> "
> + "of 4K.  You might experience some performance "
> + "hit due to that.",

nit, these changes to %016 don't make sense.  If the size is not a
multiple of 4k, then it's less than 4k, so adding leading zeros is just
a waste.  Also, are BARs that small likely to be 64bit?  Seems like not,
so more unnecessary zeros.  Thanks,

Alex

>   i, cur_region->base_addr, cur_region->size);
>  memory_region_init_io(&pci_dev->v_addrs[i].real_iomem,
>&slow_bar_ops, &pci_dev->v_addrs[i],
> @@ -632,7 +637,8 @@ again:
>  rp->valid = 0;
>  rp->resource_fd = -1;
>  size = end - start + 1;
> -flags &= IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH;
> +flags &= IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH
> + | IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
>  if (size == 0 || (flags & ~IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) == 0) {
>  continue;
>  }






Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm/pci-assign: 64 bits bar emulation

2012-12-19 Thread Hao, Xudong
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 12:06 AM
> To: Hao, Xudong
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; mtosa...@redhat.com; g...@redhat.com;
> k...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm/pci-assign: 64 bits bar emulation
> 
> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:47 +0800, Xudong Hao wrote:
> > Enable 64 bits bar emulation.
> >
> > v2 changes from v1:
> > - Change 0lx% to 0x%016 when print a 64 bit variable.
> >
> > Test pass with the current seabios which already support 64bit pci bars.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao 
> > ---
> >  hw/kvm/pci-assign.c |   22 ++
> >  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
> > index 7a0998c..fb58ca9 100644
> > --- a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
> > +++ b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
> > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
> >  #define IORESOURCE_IRQ  0x0400
> >  #define IORESOURCE_DMA  0x0800
> >  #define IORESOURCE_PREFETCH 0x2000  /* No side effects */
> > +#define IORESOURCE_MEM_64   0x0010
> >
> >  //#define DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT_DEBUG
> >
> > @@ -442,9 +443,13 @@ static int assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion
> *io_regions,
> >
> >  /* handle memory io regions */
> >  if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
> > -int t = cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH
> > -? PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH
> > -: PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
> > +int t = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
> > +if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) {
> > +t |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH;
> > +}
> > +if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM_64) {
> > +t |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64;
> > +}
> >
> >  /* map physical memory */
> >  pci_dev->v_addrs[i].u.r_virtbase = mmap(NULL,
> cur_region->size,
> > @@ -468,10 +473,10 @@ static int
> assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion *io_regions,
> >  (cur_region->base_addr & 0xFFF);
> >
> >  if (cur_region->size & 0xFFF) {
> > -error_report("PCI region %d at address 0x%" PRIx64 "
> has "
> > - "size 0x%" PRIx64 ", which is not a
> multiple of "
> > - "4K.  You might experience some
> performance hit "
> > - "due to that.",
> > +error_report("PCI region %d at address 0x%016" PRIx64
> " has "
> > + "size 0x%016" PRIx64 ", which is not a
> multiple "
> > + "of 4K.  You might experience some
> performance "
> > + "hit due to that.",
> 
> nit, these changes to %016 don't make sense.  If the size is not a
> multiple of 4k, then it's less than 4k, so adding leading zeros is just
> a waste.  Also, are BARs that small likely to be 64bit?  Seems like not,
> so more unnecessary zeros.  Thanks,
> 

Alex,
You're right for this error_report print less than 4k. So your comments is 
removing 016 and just remain the original code is fine, right?




Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm/pci-assign: 64 bits bar emulation

2012-12-19 Thread Alex Williamson
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 01:52 +, Hao, Xudong wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 12:06 AM
> > To: Hao, Xudong
> > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; mtosa...@redhat.com; g...@redhat.com;
> > k...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm/pci-assign: 64 bits bar emulation
> > 
> > On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:47 +0800, Xudong Hao wrote:
> > > Enable 64 bits bar emulation.
> > >
> > > v2 changes from v1:
> > > - Change 0lx% to 0x%016 when print a 64 bit variable.
> > >
> > > Test pass with the current seabios which already support 64bit pci bars.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao 
> > > ---
> > >  hw/kvm/pci-assign.c |   22 ++
> > >  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
> > > index 7a0998c..fb58ca9 100644
> > > --- a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
> > > +++ b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
> > > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
> > >  #define IORESOURCE_IRQ  0x0400
> > >  #define IORESOURCE_DMA  0x0800
> > >  #define IORESOURCE_PREFETCH 0x2000  /* No side effects */
> > > +#define IORESOURCE_MEM_64   0x0010
> > >
> > >  //#define DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT_DEBUG
> > >
> > > @@ -442,9 +443,13 @@ static int assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion
> > *io_regions,
> > >
> > >  /* handle memory io regions */
> > >  if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
> > > -int t = cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH
> > > -? PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH
> > > -: PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
> > > +int t = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
> > > +if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) {
> > > +t |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH;
> > > +}
> > > +if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM_64) {
> > > +t |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64;
> > > +}
> > >
> > >  /* map physical memory */
> > >  pci_dev->v_addrs[i].u.r_virtbase = mmap(NULL,
> > cur_region->size,
> > > @@ -468,10 +473,10 @@ static int
> > assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion *io_regions,
> > >  (cur_region->base_addr & 0xFFF);
> > >
> > >  if (cur_region->size & 0xFFF) {
> > > -error_report("PCI region %d at address 0x%" PRIx64 "
> > has "
> > > - "size 0x%" PRIx64 ", which is not a
> > multiple of "
> > > - "4K.  You might experience some
> > performance hit "
> > > - "due to that.",
> > > +error_report("PCI region %d at address 0x%016" PRIx64
> > " has "
> > > + "size 0x%016" PRIx64 ", which is not a
> > multiple "
> > > + "of 4K.  You might experience some
> > performance "
> > > + "hit due to that.",
> > 
> > nit, these changes to %016 don't make sense.  If the size is not a
> > multiple of 4k, then it's less than 4k, so adding leading zeros is just
> > a waste.  Also, are BARs that small likely to be 64bit?  Seems like not,
> > so more unnecessary zeros.  Thanks,
> > 
> 
> Alex,
> You're right for this error_report print less than 4k. So your comments is 
> removing 016 and just remain the original code is fine, right?

Yes, I'd just drop that chunk and leave the original error string.
Thanks,

Alex




Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm/pci-assign: 64 bits bar emulation

2012-12-19 Thread Hao, Xudong
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:39 AM
> To: Hao, Xudong
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; mtosa...@redhat.com; g...@redhat.com;
> k...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm/pci-assign: 64 bits bar emulation
> 
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 01:52 +, Hao, Xudong wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 12:06 AM
> > > To: Hao, Xudong
> > > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; mtosa...@redhat.com; g...@redhat.com;
> > > k...@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm/pci-assign: 64 bits bar emulation
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:47 +0800, Xudong Hao wrote:
> > > > Enable 64 bits bar emulation.
> > > >
> > > > v2 changes from v1:
> > > > - Change 0lx% to 0x%016 when print a 64 bit variable.
> > > >
> > > > Test pass with the current seabios which already support 64bit pci bars.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao 
> > > > ---
> > > >  hw/kvm/pci-assign.c |   22 ++
> > > >  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
> > > > index 7a0998c..fb58ca9 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
> > > > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
> > > >  #define IORESOURCE_IRQ  0x0400
> > > >  #define IORESOURCE_DMA  0x0800
> > > >  #define IORESOURCE_PREFETCH 0x2000  /* No side effects */
> > > > +#define IORESOURCE_MEM_64   0x0010
> > > >
> > > >  //#define DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT_DEBUG
> > > >
> > > > @@ -442,9 +443,13 @@ static int
> assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion
> > > *io_regions,
> > > >
> > > >  /* handle memory io regions */
> > > >  if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
> > > > -int t = cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH
> > > > -? PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH
> > > > -: PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
> > > > +int t = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
> > > > +if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) {
> > > > +t |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH;
> > > > +}
> > > > +if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM_64) {
> > > > +t |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64;
> > > > +}
> > > >
> > > >  /* map physical memory */
> > > >  pci_dev->v_addrs[i].u.r_virtbase = mmap(NULL,
> > > cur_region->size,
> > > > @@ -468,10 +473,10 @@ static int
> > > assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion *io_regions,
> > > >  (cur_region->base_addr & 0xFFF);
> > > >
> > > >  if (cur_region->size & 0xFFF) {
> > > > -error_report("PCI region %d at address 0x%" PRIx64
> "
> > > has "
> > > > - "size 0x%" PRIx64 ", which is not a
> > > multiple of "
> > > > - "4K.  You might experience some
> > > performance hit "
> > > > - "due to that.",
> > > > +error_report("PCI region %d at address 0x%016"
> PRIx64
> > > " has "
> > > > + "size 0x%016" PRIx64 ", which is not
> a
> > > multiple "
> > > > + "of 4K.  You might experience some
> > > performance "
> > > > + "hit due to that.",
> > >
> > > nit, these changes to %016 don't make sense.  If the size is not a
> > > multiple of 4k, then it's less than 4k, so adding leading zeros is just
> > > a waste.  Also, are BARs that small likely to be 64bit?  Seems like not,
> > > so more unnecessary zeros.  Thanks,
> > >
> >
> > Alex,
> > You're right for this error_report print less than 4k. So your comments is
> removing 016 and just remain the original code is fine, right?
> 
> Yes, I'd just drop that chunk and leave the original error string.

I'll send next version to remove it.

> Thanks,
> 
> Alex