Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 repost 6/7] mm: add the related functions to get free page info

2016-07-27 Thread Li, Liang Z
> On 07/27/2016 03:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:40:56AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >> On 07/26/2016 06:23 PM, Liang Li wrote:
> >>> + for_each_migratetype_order(order, t) {
> >>> + list_for_each(curr, >free_area[order].free_list[t]) {
> >>> + pfn = page_to_pfn(list_entry(curr, struct page, lru));
> >>> + if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn) {
> >>> + page_num = 1UL << order;
> >>> + if (pfn + page_num > end_pfn)
> >>> + page_num = end_pfn - pfn;
> >>> + bitmap_set(bitmap, pfn - start_pfn,
> page_num);
> >>> + }
> >>> + }
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> Nit:  The 'page_num' nomenclature really confused me here.  It is the
> >> number of bits being set in the bitmap.  Seems like calling it
> >> nr_pages or num_pages would be more appropriate.
> >>
> >> Isn't this bitmap out of date by the time it's send up to the
> >> hypervisor?  Is there something that makes the inaccuracy OK here?
> >
> > Yes. Calling these free pages is unfortunate. It's likely to confuse
> > people thinking they can just discard these pages.
> >
> > Hypervisor sends a request. We respond with this list of pages, and
> > the guarantee hypervisor needs is that these were free sometime
> > between request and response, so they are safe to free if they are
> > unmodified since the request. hypervisor can detect modifications so
> > it can detect modifications itself and does not need guest help.
> 
> Ahh, that makes sense.
> 
> So the hypervisor is trying to figure out: "Which pages do I move?".  It wants
> to know which pages the guest thinks have good data and need to move.
> But, the list of free pages is (likely) smaller than the list of pages with 
> good
> data, so it asks for that instead.
> 
> A write to a page means that it has valuable data, regardless of whether it
> was in the free list or not.
> 
> The hypervisor only skips moving pages that were free *and* were never
> written to.  So we never lose data, even if this "get free page info"
> stuff is totally out of date.
> 
> The patch description and code comments are, um, a _bit_ light for this level
> of subtlety. :)

I will add more description about this in v3.

Thanks!
Liang



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 repost 6/7] mm: add the related functions to get free page info

2016-07-27 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:10:16AM +, Li, Liang Z wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 repost 6/7] mm: add the related functions to get free
> > page info
> > 
> > On 07/26/2016 06:23 PM, Liang Li wrote:
> > > + for_each_migratetype_order(order, t) {
> > > + list_for_each(curr, >free_area[order].free_list[t]) {
> > > + pfn = page_to_pfn(list_entry(curr, struct page, lru));
> > > + if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn) {
> > > + page_num = 1UL << order;
> > > + if (pfn + page_num > end_pfn)
> > > + page_num = end_pfn - pfn;
> > > + bitmap_set(bitmap, pfn - start_pfn,
> > page_num);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > 
> > Nit:  The 'page_num' nomenclature really confused me here.  It is the
> > number of bits being set in the bitmap.  Seems like calling it nr_pages or
> > num_pages would be more appropriate.
> > 
> 
> You are right,  will change.
> 
> > Isn't this bitmap out of date by the time it's send up to the hypervisor?  
> > Is
> > there something that makes the inaccuracy OK here?
> 
> Yes. The dirty page logging will be used to correct the inaccuracy.
> The dirty page logging should be started before getting the free page bitmap, 
> then if some of the free pages become no free for writing, these pages will 
> be tracked by the dirty page logging mechanism.
> 
> Thanks!
> Liang

Right but this should be clear from code and naming.




Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 repost 6/7] mm: add the related functions to get free page info

2016-07-27 Thread Li, Liang Z
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 repost 6/7] mm: add the related functions to get free
> page info
> 
> On 07/26/2016 06:23 PM, Liang Li wrote:
> > +   for_each_migratetype_order(order, t) {
> > +   list_for_each(curr, >free_area[order].free_list[t]) {
> > +   pfn = page_to_pfn(list_entry(curr, struct page, lru));
> > +   if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn) {
> > +   page_num = 1UL << order;
> > +   if (pfn + page_num > end_pfn)
> > +   page_num = end_pfn - pfn;
> > +   bitmap_set(bitmap, pfn - start_pfn,
> page_num);
> > +   }
> > +   }
> > +   }
> 
> Nit:  The 'page_num' nomenclature really confused me here.  It is the
> number of bits being set in the bitmap.  Seems like calling it nr_pages or
> num_pages would be more appropriate.
> 

You are right,  will change.

> Isn't this bitmap out of date by the time it's send up to the hypervisor?  Is
> there something that makes the inaccuracy OK here?

Yes. The dirty page logging will be used to correct the inaccuracy.
The dirty page logging should be started before getting the free page bitmap, 
then if some of the free pages become no free for writing, these pages will be 
tracked by the dirty page logging mechanism.

Thanks!
Liang



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 repost 6/7] mm: add the related functions to get free page info

2016-07-27 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 03:16:57PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 07/27/2016 03:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:40:56AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >> On 07/26/2016 06:23 PM, Liang Li wrote:
> >>> + for_each_migratetype_order(order, t) {
> >>> + list_for_each(curr, >free_area[order].free_list[t]) {
> >>> + pfn = page_to_pfn(list_entry(curr, struct page, lru));
> >>> + if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn) {
> >>> + page_num = 1UL << order;
> >>> + if (pfn + page_num > end_pfn)
> >>> + page_num = end_pfn - pfn;
> >>> + bitmap_set(bitmap, pfn - start_pfn, page_num);
> >>> + }
> >>> + }
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> Nit:  The 'page_num' nomenclature really confused me here.  It is the
> >> number of bits being set in the bitmap.  Seems like calling it nr_pages
> >> or num_pages would be more appropriate.
> >>
> >> Isn't this bitmap out of date by the time it's send up to the
> >> hypervisor?  Is there something that makes the inaccuracy OK here?
> > 
> > Yes. Calling these free pages is unfortunate. It's likely to confuse
> > people thinking they can just discard these pages.
> > 
> > Hypervisor sends a request. We respond with this list of pages, and
> > the guarantee hypervisor needs is that these were free sometime between 
> > request
> > and response, so they are safe to free if they are unmodified
> > since the request. hypervisor can detect modifications so
> > it can detect modifications itself and does not need guest help.
> 
> Ahh, that makes sense.
> 
> So the hypervisor is trying to figure out: "Which pages do I move?".  It
> wants to know which pages the guest thinks have good data and need to
> move.  But, the list of free pages is (likely) smaller than the list of
> pages with good data, so it asks for that instead.
> 
> A write to a page means that it has valuable data, regardless of whether
> it was in the free list or not.
> 
> The hypervisor only skips moving pages that were free *and* were never
> written to.

Right - except never is a long time, so we just need it "since the request
was received".

> So we never lose data, even if this "get free page info"
> stuff is totally out of date.

So if you include pages that were written to before the request
then yes data will be lost. This is why we do this scan
after we get the request and not e.g. on boot :)

> The patch description and code comments are, um, a _bit_ light for this
> level of subtlety. :)

Add to that, for any page it is safe to skip and not add it to list.
So the requirement is for when page must *not* be on this list:
it must not be there if it is needed by guest but was not
modified since the request.

Calling it "free" will just keep confusing people.  Either use the
verbose "free or modified" or invent a new word like "discardable" and
add a comment explaining that page is always discardable unless it's
content is needed by Linux but was not modified since the request.

-- 
MST



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 repost 6/7] mm: add the related functions to get free page info

2016-07-27 Thread Dave Hansen
On 07/27/2016 03:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:40:56AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 07/26/2016 06:23 PM, Liang Li wrote:
>>> +   for_each_migratetype_order(order, t) {
>>> +   list_for_each(curr, >free_area[order].free_list[t]) {
>>> +   pfn = page_to_pfn(list_entry(curr, struct page, lru));
>>> +   if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn) {
>>> +   page_num = 1UL << order;
>>> +   if (pfn + page_num > end_pfn)
>>> +   page_num = end_pfn - pfn;
>>> +   bitmap_set(bitmap, pfn - start_pfn, page_num);
>>> +   }
>>> +   }
>>> +   }
>>
>> Nit:  The 'page_num' nomenclature really confused me here.  It is the
>> number of bits being set in the bitmap.  Seems like calling it nr_pages
>> or num_pages would be more appropriate.
>>
>> Isn't this bitmap out of date by the time it's send up to the
>> hypervisor?  Is there something that makes the inaccuracy OK here?
> 
> Yes. Calling these free pages is unfortunate. It's likely to confuse
> people thinking they can just discard these pages.
> 
> Hypervisor sends a request. We respond with this list of pages, and
> the guarantee hypervisor needs is that these were free sometime between 
> request
> and response, so they are safe to free if they are unmodified
> since the request. hypervisor can detect modifications so
> it can detect modifications itself and does not need guest help.

Ahh, that makes sense.

So the hypervisor is trying to figure out: "Which pages do I move?".  It
wants to know which pages the guest thinks have good data and need to
move.  But, the list of free pages is (likely) smaller than the list of
pages with good data, so it asks for that instead.

A write to a page means that it has valuable data, regardless of whether
it was in the free list or not.

The hypervisor only skips moving pages that were free *and* were never
written to.  So we never lose data, even if this "get free page info"
stuff is totally out of date.

The patch description and code comments are, um, a _bit_ light for this
level of subtlety. :)



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 repost 6/7] mm: add the related functions to get free page info

2016-07-27 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:23:35AM +0800, Liang Li wrote:
> Save the free page info into a page bitmap, will be used in virtio
> balloon device driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liang Li 
> Cc: Andrew Morton 
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka 
> Cc: Mel Gorman 
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin 
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini 
> Cc: Cornelia Huck 
> Cc: Amit Shah 
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 46 ++
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 7da61ad..3ad8b10 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -4523,6 +4523,52 @@ unsigned long get_max_pfn(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_max_pfn);
>  
> +static void mark_free_pages_bitmap(struct zone *zone, unsigned long 
> start_pfn,
> + unsigned long end_pfn, unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned long len)
> +{
> + unsigned long pfn, flags, page_num;
> + unsigned int order, t;
> + struct list_head *curr;
> +
> + if (zone_is_empty(zone))
> + return;
> + end_pfn = min(start_pfn + len, end_pfn);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(>lock, flags);
> +
> + for_each_migratetype_order(order, t) {

Why not do each order separately? This way you can
use a single bit to pass a huge page to host.

Not a requirement but hey.

Alternatively (and maybe that is a better idea0
if you wanted to, you could just skip lone 4K pages.
It's not clear that they are worth bothering with.
Add a flag to start with some reasonably large order and go from there.


> + list_for_each(curr, >free_area[order].free_list[t]) {
> + pfn = page_to_pfn(list_entry(curr, struct page, lru));
> + if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn) {
> + page_num = 1UL << order;
> + if (pfn + page_num > end_pfn)
> + page_num = end_pfn - pfn;
> + bitmap_set(bitmap, pfn - start_pfn, page_num);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(>lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +int get_free_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> + unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned long len)
> +{
> + struct zone *zone;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (bitmap == NULL || start_pfn > end_pfn || start_pfn >= max_pfn)
> + return 0;
> + if (end_pfn < max_pfn)
> + ret = 1;
> + if (end_pfn >= max_pfn)
> + ret = 0;
> +
> + for_each_populated_zone(zone)
> + mark_free_pages_bitmap(zone, start_pfn, end_pfn, bitmap, len);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_free_pages);
> +
>  static void zoneref_set_zone(struct zone *zone, struct zoneref *zoneref)
>  {
>   zoneref->zone = zone;
> -- 
> 1.9.1



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 repost 6/7] mm: add the related functions to get free page info

2016-07-27 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:40:56AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 07/26/2016 06:23 PM, Liang Li wrote:
> > +   for_each_migratetype_order(order, t) {
> > +   list_for_each(curr, >free_area[order].free_list[t]) {
> > +   pfn = page_to_pfn(list_entry(curr, struct page, lru));
> > +   if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn) {
> > +   page_num = 1UL << order;
> > +   if (pfn + page_num > end_pfn)
> > +   page_num = end_pfn - pfn;
> > +   bitmap_set(bitmap, pfn - start_pfn, page_num);
> > +   }
> > +   }
> > +   }
> 
> Nit:  The 'page_num' nomenclature really confused me here.  It is the
> number of bits being set in the bitmap.  Seems like calling it nr_pages
> or num_pages would be more appropriate.
> 
> Isn't this bitmap out of date by the time it's send up to the
> hypervisor?  Is there something that makes the inaccuracy OK here?

Yes. Calling these free pages is unfortunate. It's likely to confuse
people thinking they can just discard these pages.

Hypervisor sends a request. We respond with this list of pages, and
the guarantee hypervisor needs is that these were free sometime between request
and response, so they are safe to free if they are unmodified
since the request. hypervisor can detect modifications so
it can detect modifications itself and does not need guest help.

Maybe just call these "free if unmodified" and reflect this
everywhere - verbose but hey. Better naming suggestions would be
welcome.

-- 
MST



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 repost 6/7] mm: add the related functions to get free page info

2016-07-27 Thread Dave Hansen
On 07/26/2016 06:23 PM, Liang Li wrote:
> + for_each_migratetype_order(order, t) {
> + list_for_each(curr, >free_area[order].free_list[t]) {
> + pfn = page_to_pfn(list_entry(curr, struct page, lru));
> + if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn) {
> + page_num = 1UL << order;
> + if (pfn + page_num > end_pfn)
> + page_num = end_pfn - pfn;
> + bitmap_set(bitmap, pfn - start_pfn, page_num);
> + }
> + }
> + }

Nit:  The 'page_num' nomenclature really confused me here.  It is the
number of bits being set in the bitmap.  Seems like calling it nr_pages
or num_pages would be more appropriate.

Isn't this bitmap out of date by the time it's send up to the
hypervisor?  Is there something that makes the inaccuracy OK here?



[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 repost 6/7] mm: add the related functions to get free page info

2016-07-26 Thread Liang Li
Save the free page info into a page bitmap, will be used in virtio
balloon device driver.

Signed-off-by: Liang Li 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Vlastimil Babka 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin 
Cc: Paolo Bonzini 
Cc: Cornelia Huck 
Cc: Amit Shah 
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 46 ++
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 7da61ad..3ad8b10 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4523,6 +4523,52 @@ unsigned long get_max_pfn(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_max_pfn);
 
+static void mark_free_pages_bitmap(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
+   unsigned long end_pfn, unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+   unsigned long pfn, flags, page_num;
+   unsigned int order, t;
+   struct list_head *curr;
+
+   if (zone_is_empty(zone))
+   return;
+   end_pfn = min(start_pfn + len, end_pfn);
+   spin_lock_irqsave(>lock, flags);
+
+   for_each_migratetype_order(order, t) {
+   list_for_each(curr, >free_area[order].free_list[t]) {
+   pfn = page_to_pfn(list_entry(curr, struct page, lru));
+   if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn) {
+   page_num = 1UL << order;
+   if (pfn + page_num > end_pfn)
+   page_num = end_pfn - pfn;
+   bitmap_set(bitmap, pfn - start_pfn, page_num);
+   }
+   }
+   }
+
+   spin_unlock_irqrestore(>lock, flags);
+}
+
+int get_free_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
+   unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+   struct zone *zone;
+   int ret = 0;
+
+   if (bitmap == NULL || start_pfn > end_pfn || start_pfn >= max_pfn)
+   return 0;
+   if (end_pfn < max_pfn)
+   ret = 1;
+   if (end_pfn >= max_pfn)
+   ret = 0;
+
+   for_each_populated_zone(zone)
+   mark_free_pages_bitmap(zone, start_pfn, end_pfn, bitmap, len);
+   return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_free_pages);
+
 static void zoneref_set_zone(struct zone *zone, struct zoneref *zoneref)
 {
zoneref->zone = zone;
-- 
1.9.1