Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 3/3] target/ppc: Refactor emulation of vmrgew and vmrgow instructions

2019-08-27 Thread David Gibson
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:19:27PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 8/27/19 2:37 AM, Stefan Brankovic wrote:
> > Since I found this two instructions implemented with tcg, I refactored
> > them so they are consistent with other similar implementations that
> > I introduced in this patch.
> > 
> > Also, a new dual macro GEN_VXFORM_TRANS_DUAL is added. This macro is
> > used if one instruction is realized with direct translation, and second
> > one with a helper.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Brankovic 
> > ---
> >  target/ppc/translate/vmx-impl.inc.c | 66 
> > +
> >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson 

Applied to ppc-for-4.2, thanks.

> 
> 
> r~
> 

-- 
David Gibson| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 3/3] target/ppc: Refactor emulation of vmrgew and vmrgow instructions

2019-08-27 Thread Richard Henderson
On 8/27/19 2:37 AM, Stefan Brankovic wrote:
> Since I found this two instructions implemented with tcg, I refactored
> them so they are consistent with other similar implementations that
> I introduced in this patch.
> 
> Also, a new dual macro GEN_VXFORM_TRANS_DUAL is added. This macro is
> used if one instruction is realized with direct translation, and second
> one with a helper.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Brankovic 
> ---
>  target/ppc/translate/vmx-impl.inc.c | 66 
> +
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson 


r~



[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 3/3] target/ppc: Refactor emulation of vmrgew and vmrgow instructions

2019-08-27 Thread Stefan Brankovic
Since I found this two instructions implemented with tcg, I refactored
them so they are consistent with other similar implementations that
I introduced in this patch.

Also, a new dual macro GEN_VXFORM_TRANS_DUAL is added. This macro is
used if one instruction is realized with direct translation, and second
one with a helper.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Brankovic 
---
 target/ppc/translate/vmx-impl.inc.c | 66 +
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/vmx-impl.inc.c 
b/target/ppc/translate/vmx-impl.inc.c
index e8a0fb6..6af9c73 100644
--- a/target/ppc/translate/vmx-impl.inc.c
+++ b/target/ppc/translate/vmx-impl.inc.c
@@ -350,6 +350,28 @@ static void glue(gen_, name0##_##name1)(DisasContext *ctx) 
\
 }  \
 }
 
+/*
+ * We use this macro if one instruction is realized with direct
+ * translation, and second one with helper.
+ */
+#define GEN_VXFORM_TRANS_DUAL(name0, flg0, flg2_0, name1, flg1, flg2_1)\
+static void glue(gen_, name0##_##name1)(DisasContext *ctx) \
+{  \
+if ((Rc(ctx->opcode) == 0) &&  \
+((ctx->insns_flags & flg0) || (ctx->insns_flags2 & flg2_0))) { \
+if (unlikely(!ctx->altivec_enabled)) { \
+gen_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_VPU);  \
+return;\
+}  \
+trans_##name0(ctx);\
+} else if ((Rc(ctx->opcode) == 1) &&   \
+((ctx->insns_flags & flg1) || (ctx->insns_flags2 & flg2_1))) { \
+gen_##name1(ctx);  \
+} else {   \
+gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL_INVAL);\
+}  \
+}
+
 /* Adds support to provide invalid mask */
 #define GEN_VXFORM_DUAL_EXT(name0, flg0, flg2_0, inval0,\
 name1, flg1, flg2_1, inval1)\
@@ -431,20 +453,13 @@ GEN_VXFORM(vmrglb, 6, 4);
 GEN_VXFORM(vmrglh, 6, 5);
 GEN_VXFORM(vmrglw, 6, 6);
 
-static void gen_vmrgew(DisasContext *ctx)
+static void trans_vmrgew(DisasContext *ctx)
 {
-TCGv_i64 tmp;
-TCGv_i64 avr;
-int VT, VA, VB;
-if (unlikely(!ctx->altivec_enabled)) {
-gen_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_VPU);
-return;
-}
-VT = rD(ctx->opcode);
-VA = rA(ctx->opcode);
-VB = rB(ctx->opcode);
-tmp = tcg_temp_new_i64();
-avr = tcg_temp_new_i64();
+int VT = rD(ctx->opcode);
+int VA = rA(ctx->opcode);
+int VB = rB(ctx->opcode);
+TCGv_i64 tmp = tcg_temp_new_i64();
+TCGv_i64 avr = tcg_temp_new_i64();
 
 get_avr64(avr, VB, true);
 tcg_gen_shri_i64(tmp, avr, 32);
@@ -462,21 +477,14 @@ static void gen_vmrgew(DisasContext *ctx)
 tcg_temp_free_i64(avr);
 }
 
-static void gen_vmrgow(DisasContext *ctx)
+static void trans_vmrgow(DisasContext *ctx)
 {
-TCGv_i64 t0, t1;
-TCGv_i64 avr;
-int VT, VA, VB;
-if (unlikely(!ctx->altivec_enabled)) {
-gen_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_VPU);
-return;
-}
-VT = rD(ctx->opcode);
-VA = rA(ctx->opcode);
-VB = rB(ctx->opcode);
-t0 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
-t1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
-avr = tcg_temp_new_i64();
+int VT = rD(ctx->opcode);
+int VA = rA(ctx->opcode);
+int VB = rB(ctx->opcode);
+TCGv_i64 t0 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
+TCGv_i64 t1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
+TCGv_i64 avr = tcg_temp_new_i64();
 
 get_avr64(t0, VB, true);
 get_avr64(t1, VA, true);
@@ -1165,14 +1173,14 @@ GEN_VXFORM_ENV(vminfp, 5, 17);
 GEN_VXFORM_HETRO(vextublx, 6, 24)
 GEN_VXFORM_HETRO(vextuhlx, 6, 25)
 GEN_VXFORM_HETRO(vextuwlx, 6, 26)
-GEN_VXFORM_DUAL(vmrgow, PPC_NONE, PPC2_ALTIVEC_207,
+GEN_VXFORM_TRANS_DUAL(vmrgow, PPC_NONE, PPC2_ALTIVEC_207,
 vextuwlx, PPC_NONE, PPC2_ISA300)
 GEN_VXFORM_HETRO(vextubrx, 6, 28)
 GEN_VXFORM_HETRO(vextuhrx, 6, 29)
 GEN_VXFORM_HETRO(vextuwrx, 6, 30)
 GEN_VXFORM_TRANS(lvsl, 6, 31)
 GEN_VXFORM_TRANS(lvsr, 6, 32)
-GEN_VXFORM_DUAL(vmrgew, PPC_NONE, PPC2_ALTIVEC_207, \
+GEN_VXFORM_TRANS_DUAL(vmrgew, PPC_NONE, PPC2_ALTIVEC_207,
 vextuwrx, PPC_NONE, PPC2_ISA300)
 
 #define GEN_VXRFORM1(opname, name, str, opc2, opc3) \
-- 
2.7.4