Re: [Qemu-devel] [Patchew-devel] [PATCH v15 0/5] linux-user: A set of miscellaneous patches

2019-06-28 Thread Aleksandar Markovic
> I've moved the env/rpm/uname commands before the actual testing commands, so
> the information can be collected even upon failures.

Would it be hard for you to capture output of the command "ldd --version" and 
include it early in the log?

That would be sufficient for us to deduce "glibc version".

Thanks,
Aleksandar


Re: [Qemu-devel] [Patchew-devel] [PATCH v15 0/5] linux-user: A set of miscellaneous patches

2019-06-28 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 28/06/2019 à 14:41, Fam Zheng a écrit :
> On Fri, 06/28 14:15, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Dear Patchew developers,
>>
>> Le 28/06/2019 à 11:49, no-re...@patchew.org a écrit :
>>> Patchew URL: 
>>> https://patchew.org/QEMU/1561712082-31441-1-git-send-email-aleksandar.marko...@rt-rk.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This series failed build test on s390x host. Please find the details below.
>>
>> To debug this kind of problem (at least to reproduce it), it may be
>> interesting to know the OS release of the target build environment
>> (glibc version, gcc version, ...) on which the build fails.
>>
>> Is this possible to add this in the mail (or in the logs)?
> 
> I've moved the env/rpm/uname commands before the actual testing commands, so
> the information can be collected even upon failures.

Thank you Fam.

>From the v16 log, I can see s390x runs Fedora 30 (v15 works fine on
debian/sid s390x)

Laurent



Re: [Qemu-devel] [Patchew-devel] [PATCH v15 0/5] linux-user: A set of miscellaneous patches

2019-06-28 Thread Fam Zheng
On Fri, 06/28 14:15, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Dear Patchew developers,
> 
> Le 28/06/2019 à 11:49, no-re...@patchew.org a écrit :
> > Patchew URL: 
> > https://patchew.org/QEMU/1561712082-31441-1-git-send-email-aleksandar.marko...@rt-rk.com/
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This series failed build test on s390x host. Please find the details below.
> 
> To debug this kind of problem (at least to reproduce it), it may be
> interesting to know the OS release of the target build environment
> (glibc version, gcc version, ...) on which the build fails.
> 
> Is this possible to add this in the mail (or in the logs)?

I've moved the env/rpm/uname commands before the actual testing commands, so
the information can be collected even upon failures.

Fam

> 
> ...
> >   CC  microblaze-linux-user/linux-user/strace.o
> >   CC  mips64el-linux-user/linux-user/syscall.o
> >   LINKmicroblazeel-linux-user/qemu-microblazeel
> > /var/tmp/patchew-tester-tmp-tr0wvoyz/src/linux-user/syscall.c:322:16: 
> > error: conflicting types for ‘statx’
> >   322 | _syscall5(int, statx, int, dirfd, const char *, pathname, int, 
> > flags,
> >   |^
> > /var/tmp/patchew-tester-tmp-tr0wvoyz/src/linux-user/syscall.c:213:13: note: 
> > in definition of macro ‘_syscall5’
> 
> Thanks,
> Laurent
> 
> ___
> Patchew-devel mailing list
> patchew-de...@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/patchew-devel