Re: [Qemu-devel] cgroup blkio weight has no effect on qemu
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 06:41:16PM +0800, 陈博 wrote: Sending the question once is enough, and reply with a 'ping' message if no one has answered after a few days waiting for response. There is no need to send the same mail 11 times over. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
[Qemu-devel] cgroup blkio weight has no effect on qemu
Hi folks, Could you enlighten me how to achieve proportional IO sharing by using cgroup, instead of qemu's io-throttling? My qemu config is like: -drive file=$DISKFILe,if=none,format=qcow2,cache=none,aio=native -device virtio-blk-pci... Test command inside vm is like: dd if=/dev/vdc of=/dev/null iflag=direct Cgroup blkio weight of the qemu process is properly configured as well. But no matter how change the proportion, such as vm1=400 and vm2=100, I can only get the equal IO speed. Wondering cgroup blkio.weight or blkio.weight_device has no effect on qemu? PS. cache=writethrough aio=threads is also tested, the same results. - Bob
[Qemu-devel] cgroup blkio weight has no effect on qemu
Hi, Could you enlighten me how to achieve proportional IO sharing by using cgroup, instead of qemu's own io-throttling? My qemu config is like: -drive file=$DISKFILe,if=none,format=qcow2,cache=none,aio=native -device virtio-blk-pci... Test command inside vm is like: dd if=/dev/vdc of=/dev/null iflag=direct Cgroup blkio weight of the qemu process is properly configured as well. But no matter how change the proportion, such as vm1=400 and vm2=100, I can only get the equal IO speed. Wondering cgroup blkio.weight or blkio.weight_device has no effect on qemu? PS. cache=writethrough aio=threads is also tested, the same results. - Bob
[Qemu-devel] cgroup blkio weight has no effect on qemu
Hi folks, Could you enlighten me how to achieve proportional IO sharing by using cgroup, instead of qemu's io-throttling? My qemu config is like: -drive file=$DISKFILe,if=none,format=qcow2,cache=none,aio=native -device virtio-blk-pci... Test command inside vm is like: dd if=/dev/vdc of=/dev/null iflag=direct Cgroup blkio weight of the qemu process is properly configured as well. But no matter how change the proportion, such as vm1=400 and vm2=100, I can only get the equal IO speed. Wondering cgroup blkio.weight or blkio.weight_device has no effect on qemu? PS. cache=writethrough aio=threads is also tested, the same results. - Bob
[Qemu-devel] cgroup blkio weight has no effect on qemu
Hi folks, Could you enlighten me how to achieve proportional IO sharing by using cgroup, instead of qemu's io-throttling? My qemu config is like: -drive file=$DISKFILe,if=none,format=qcow2,cache=none,aio=native -device virtio-blk-pci... Test command inside vm is like: dd if=/dev/vdc of=/dev/null iflag=direct Cgroup blkio weight of the qemu process is properly configured as well. But no matter how change the proportion, such as vm1=400 and vm2=100, I can only get the equal IO speed. Wondering cgroup blkio.weight or blkio.weight_device has no effect on qemu? PS. cache=writethrough aio=threads is also tested, the same results. - Bob
[Qemu-devel] cgroup blkio weight has no effect on qemu
Sorry for disturbing by reply, don't know why I'm not able to send a new mail. Hi folks, Could you enlighten me how to achieve proportional IO sharing by using cgroup, instead of qemu's io-throttling? My qemu config is like: -drive file=$DISKFILe,if=none,format=qcow2,cache=none,aio=native -device virtio-blk-pci... Test command inside vm is like: dd if=/dev/vdc of=/dev/null iflag=direct Cgroup blkio weight of the qemu process is properly configured as well. But no matter how change the proportion, such as vm1=400 and vm2=100, I can only get the equal IO speed. Wondering cgroup blkio.weight or blkio.weight_device has no effect on qemu? PS. cache=writethrough aio=threads is also tested, the same results. - Bob 2016-01-20 18:04 GMT+08:00 Markus Armbruster : > > >
[Qemu-devel] cgroup blkio weight has no effect on qemu
Hi folks, Could you enlighten me how to achieve proportional IO sharing by using cgroup, instead of qemu's io-throttling? My qemu config is like: -drive file=$DISKFILe,if=none,format=qcow2,cache=none,aio=native -device virtio-blk-pci... Test command inside vm is like: dd if=/dev/vdc of=/dev/null iflag=direct Cgroup blkio weight of the qemu process is properly configured as well. But no matter how change the proportion, such as vm1=400 and vm2=100, I can only get the equal IO speed. Wondering cgroup blkio.weight or blkio.weight_device has no effect on qemu? PS. cache=writethrough aio=threads is also tested, the same results. - Bob
[Qemu-devel] cgroup blkio weight has no effect on qemu
Hi folks, Could you enlighten me how to achieve proportional IO sharing by using cgroup, instead of qemu's io-throttling? My qemu config is like: -drive file=$DISKFILe,if=none,format=qcow2,cache=none,aio=native -device virtio-blk-pci... Test command inside vm is like: dd if=/dev/vdc of=/dev/null iflag=direct Cgroup blkio weight of the qemu process is properly configured as well. But no matter how change the proportion, such as vm1=400 and vm2=100, I can only get the equal IO speed. Wondering cgroup blkio.weight or blkio.weight_device has no effect on qemu? PS. cache=writethrough aio=threads is also tested, the same results. - Bob
[Qemu-devel] cgroup blkio weight has no effect on qemu
Hi folks, Could you enlighten me about how to achieve proportional IO sharing by using cgroup, instead of qemu? My qemu config is like: -drive file=$DISKFILe,if=none,format=qcow2,cache=none,aio=native Test command inside vm is like: dd if=/dev/vdc of=/dev/null iflag=direct Cgroup blkio weight of the qemu process is properly configured as well. But no matter how change the proportion, such as vm1=400 and vm2=100, I can only get the equal IO speed. Wondering cgroup blkio.weight or blkio.weight_device has no effect on qemu??? PS. cache=writethrough aio=threads is also tested, the same results. - Bob