Re: [RFC PATCH v3 12/21] target/arm: Handle NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64()

2024-02-23 Thread Richard Henderson

On 2/23/24 00:32, Jinjie Ruan via wrote:

According to Arm GIC section 4.6.3 Interrupt superpriority, the interrupt
with superpriority is always IRQ, never FIQ, so the NMI exception trap entry
behave like IRQ.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan 
---
v3:
- Remove the FIQ NMI handle.
---
  target/arm/helper.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 0a69638651..1a5e992d26 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -11452,6 +11452,7 @@ static void arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64(CPUState *cs)
  break;
  case EXCP_IRQ:
  case EXCP_VIRQ:
+case EXCP_NMI:
  addr += 0x80;
  break;
  case EXCP_FIQ:


Handle EXCP_VNMI.


r~



[RFC PATCH v3 12/21] target/arm: Handle NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64()

2024-02-23 Thread Jinjie Ruan via
According to Arm GIC section 4.6.3 Interrupt superpriority, the interrupt
with superpriority is always IRQ, never FIQ, so the NMI exception trap entry
behave like IRQ.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan 
---
v3:
- Remove the FIQ NMI handle.
---
 target/arm/helper.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 0a69638651..1a5e992d26 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -11452,6 +11452,7 @@ static void arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64(CPUState *cs)
 break;
 case EXCP_IRQ:
 case EXCP_VIRQ:
+case EXCP_NMI:
 addr += 0x80;
 break;
 case EXCP_FIQ:
-- 
2.34.1