Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] spapr, ppc: Remove VPM0/RMLS hacks for POWER9

2020-01-07 Thread Cédric Le Goater
On 1/7/20 5:48 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> For the "pseries" machine, we use "virtual hypervisor" mode where we only
> model the CPU in non-hypervisor privileged mode.  This means that we need
> guest physical addresses within the modelled within the cpu to be treated
> as absolute physical addresses.
> 
> We used to do that by clearing LPCR[VPM0] and setting LPCR[RMLS] to a high
> limit so that the old offset based translation for guest mode applied,
> which does what we need.  However, POWER9 has removed support for that
> translation mode, which meant we had some ugly hacks to keep it working.
> 
> We now explicitly handle this sort of translation for virtual hypervisor
> mode, so the hacks aren't necessary.  We don't need to set VPM0 and RMLS
> from the machine type code - they're now ignored in vhyp mode.  On the cpu
> side we don't need to allow LPCR[RMLS] to be set on POWER9 in vhyp mode -
> that was only there to allow the hack on the machine side.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson 

Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater 

> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 6 +-
>  target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 8 
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> index 8339c4c0f8..daebcd9f38 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> @@ -58,14 +58,10 @@ static void spapr_reset_vcpu(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>   * we don't get spurious wakups before an RTAS start-cpu call.
>   * For the same reason, set PSSCR_EC.
>   */
> -lpcr &= ~(LPCR_VPM0 | LPCR_VPM1 | LPCR_ISL | LPCR_KBV | pcc->lpcr_pm);
> +lpcr &= ~(LPCR_VPM1 | LPCR_ISL | LPCR_KBV | pcc->lpcr_pm);
>  lpcr |= LPCR_LPES0 | LPCR_LPES1;
>  env->spr[SPR_PSSCR] |= PSSCR_EC;
>  
> -/* Set RMLS to the max (ie, 16G) */
> -lpcr &= ~LPCR_RMLS;
> -lpcr |= 1ull << LPCR_RMLS_SHIFT;
> -
>  ppc_store_lpcr(cpu, lpcr);
>  
>  /* Set a full AMOR so guest can use the AMR as it sees fit */
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> index d878180df5..d7f9933e6d 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> @@ -1124,14 +1124,6 @@ void ppc_store_lpcr(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong val)
>(LPCR_PECE_L_MASK & (LPCR_PDEE | LPCR_HDEE | LPCR_EEE |
>LPCR_DEE | LPCR_OEE)) | LPCR_MER | LPCR_GTSE | LPCR_TC 
> |
>LPCR_HEIC | LPCR_LPES0 | LPCR_HVICE | LPCR_HDICE);
> -/*
> - * If we have a virtual hypervisor, we need to bring back RMLS. It
> - * doesn't exist on an actual P9 but that's all we know how to
> - * configure with softmmu at the moment
> - */
> -if (cpu->vhyp) {
> -lpcr |= (val & LPCR_RMLS);
> -}
>  break;
>  default:
>  g_assert_not_reached();
> 




Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] spapr, ppc: Remove VPM0/RMLS hacks for POWER9

2020-01-08 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy



On 07/01/2020 15:48, David Gibson wrote:
> For the "pseries" machine, we use "virtual hypervisor" mode where we only
> model the CPU in non-hypervisor privileged mode.  This means that we need
> guest physical addresses within the modelled within the cpu to be treated
> as absolute physical addresses.


s/within the modelled within the cpu/within the modelled cpu/ ? Thanks,


> We used to do that by clearing LPCR[VPM0] and setting LPCR[RMLS] to a high
> limit so that the old offset based translation for guest mode applied,
> which does what we need.  However, POWER9 has removed support for that
> translation mode, which meant we had some ugly hacks to keep it working.
> 
> We now explicitly handle this sort of translation for virtual hypervisor
> mode, so the hacks aren't necessary.  We don't need to set VPM0 and RMLS
> from the machine type code - they're now ignored in vhyp mode.  On the cpu
> side we don't need to allow LPCR[RMLS] to be set on POWER9 in vhyp mode -
> that was only there to allow the hack on the machine side.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson 
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 6 +-
>  target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 8 
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> index 8339c4c0f8..daebcd9f38 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> @@ -58,14 +58,10 @@ static void spapr_reset_vcpu(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>   * we don't get spurious wakups before an RTAS start-cpu call.
>   * For the same reason, set PSSCR_EC.
>   */
> -lpcr &= ~(LPCR_VPM0 | LPCR_VPM1 | LPCR_ISL | LPCR_KBV | pcc->lpcr_pm);
> +lpcr &= ~(LPCR_VPM1 | LPCR_ISL | LPCR_KBV | pcc->lpcr_pm);
>  lpcr |= LPCR_LPES0 | LPCR_LPES1;
>  env->spr[SPR_PSSCR] |= PSSCR_EC;
>  
> -/* Set RMLS to the max (ie, 16G) */
> -lpcr &= ~LPCR_RMLS;
> -lpcr |= 1ull << LPCR_RMLS_SHIFT;
> -
>  ppc_store_lpcr(cpu, lpcr);
>  
>  /* Set a full AMOR so guest can use the AMR as it sees fit */
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> index d878180df5..d7f9933e6d 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> @@ -1124,14 +1124,6 @@ void ppc_store_lpcr(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong val)
>(LPCR_PECE_L_MASK & (LPCR_PDEE | LPCR_HDEE | LPCR_EEE |
>LPCR_DEE | LPCR_OEE)) | LPCR_MER | LPCR_GTSE | LPCR_TC 
> |
>LPCR_HEIC | LPCR_LPES0 | LPCR_HVICE | LPCR_HDICE);
> -/*
> - * If we have a virtual hypervisor, we need to bring back RMLS. It
> - * doesn't exist on an actual P9 but that's all we know how to
> - * configure with softmmu at the moment
> - */
> -if (cpu->vhyp) {
> -lpcr |= (val & LPCR_RMLS);
> -}
>  break;
>  default:
>  g_assert_not_reached();
> 

-- 
Alexey



Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] spapr, ppc: Remove VPM0/RMLS hacks for POWER9

2020-01-12 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:33:36PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/01/2020 15:48, David Gibson wrote:
> > For the "pseries" machine, we use "virtual hypervisor" mode where we only
> > model the CPU in non-hypervisor privileged mode.  This means that we need
> > guest physical addresses within the modelled within the cpu to be treated
> > as absolute physical addresses.
> 
> 
> s/within the modelled within the cpu/within the modelled cpu/ ?
> Thanks,

Thanks.

-- 
David Gibson| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature