Re: [PATCH v2 29/66] target/arm: Introduce arm_hcr_el2_eff_secstate

2022-09-28 Thread Richard Henderson

On 9/20/22 08:52, Peter Maydell wrote:

On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 at 17:22, Richard Henderson
 wrote:


For page walking, we may require HCR for a security state
that is not "current".

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson 
---
  target/arm/cpu.h| 20 +---
  target/arm/helper.c | 11 ---
  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index cea2121f67..a08e546de4 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -2401,15 +2401,15 @@ static inline bool arm_is_secure(CPUARMState *env)
   * Return true if the current security state has AArch64 EL2 or AArch32 Hyp.
   * This corresponds to the pseudocode EL2Enabled()
   */
+static inline bool arm_is_el2_enabled_secstate(CPUARMState *env, bool secure)
+{
+return (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL2)
+&& (!secure || (env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_EEL2)));


This doesn't need the outermost set of ().


Oh, that's an emacs alignment thing.

r~



Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell 

thanks
-- PMM





Re: [PATCH v2 29/66] target/arm: Introduce arm_hcr_el2_eff_secstate

2022-09-20 Thread Peter Maydell
On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 at 17:22, Richard Henderson
 wrote:
>
> For page walking, we may require HCR for a security state
> that is not "current".
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson 
> ---
>  target/arm/cpu.h| 20 +---
>  target/arm/helper.c | 11 ---
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> index cea2121f67..a08e546de4 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> @@ -2401,15 +2401,15 @@ static inline bool arm_is_secure(CPUARMState *env)
>   * Return true if the current security state has AArch64 EL2 or AArch32 Hyp.
>   * This corresponds to the pseudocode EL2Enabled()
>   */
> +static inline bool arm_is_el2_enabled_secstate(CPUARMState *env, bool secure)
> +{
> +return (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL2)
> +&& (!secure || (env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_EEL2)));

This doesn't need the outermost set of ().

Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell 

thanks
-- PMM