Re: [PULL 09/61] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Guest X86 HAXM CPUs
On 2020-03-17 18:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 17/03/20 09:55, Colin Xu wrote: On 2020-03-17 16:26, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 17/03/20 08:46, Colin Xu wrote: Hi Paolo, For future HAX patch, once it's "Reviewed-by" haxm maintainers and other reviewers, do we need "SubmitAPullRequest" separately or you will do it together with other patches? As you prefer. I wouldn't mind having to send fewer pull requests. :) Paolo Would you mind continue help HAX send pull request? It feels like easier to track the changes when stay together with other accelerator patches. We'll regularly check the reviewed patches and do necessary tests, and send you a list of patches that can be queued for next pull. What do you think? Sure, that's okay. The number of patches is low enough. Paolo Cool. Thanks a lot for the help. Colin. -- Best Regards, Colin Xu
Re: [PULL 09/61] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Guest X86 HAXM CPUs
On 17/03/20 09:55, Colin Xu wrote: > > On 2020-03-17 16:26, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 17/03/20 08:46, Colin Xu wrote: >>> Hi Paolo, >>> >>> For future HAX patch, once it's "Reviewed-by" haxm maintainers and other >>> reviewers, do we need "SubmitAPullRequest" separately or you will do it >>> together with other patches? >> As you prefer. I wouldn't mind having to send fewer pull requests. :) >> >> Paolo > > Would you mind continue help HAX send pull request? It feels like easier > to track the changes when stay together with other accelerator patches. > We'll regularly check the reviewed patches and do necessary tests, and > send you a list of patches that can be queued for next pull. > > What do you think? Sure, that's okay. The number of patches is low enough. Paolo
Re: [PULL 09/61] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Guest X86 HAXM CPUs
On 2020-03-17 16:26, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 17/03/20 08:46, Colin Xu wrote: Hi Paolo, For future HAX patch, once it's "Reviewed-by" haxm maintainers and other reviewers, do we need "SubmitAPullRequest" separately or you will do it together with other patches? As you prefer. I wouldn't mind having to send fewer pull requests. :) Paolo Would you mind continue help HAX send pull request? It feels like easier to track the changes when stay together with other accelerator patches. We'll regularly check the reviewed patches and do necessary tests, and send you a list of patches that can be queued for next pull. What do you think? Colin -- Best Regards, Colin Xu
Re: [PULL 09/61] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Guest X86 HAXM CPUs
On 17/03/20 08:46, Colin Xu wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > For future HAX patch, once it's "Reviewed-by" haxm maintainers and other > reviewers, do we need "SubmitAPullRequest" separately or you will do it > together with other patches? As you prefer. I wouldn't mind having to send fewer pull requests. :) Paolo
Re: [PULL 09/61] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Guest X86 HAXM CPUs
Hi Paolo, For future HAX patch, once it's "Reviewed-by" haxm maintainers and other reviewers, do we need "SubmitAPullRequest" separately or you will do it together with other patches? Colin On 2020-03-17 05:26, Paolo Bonzini wrote: From: Colin Xu HAXM covers below files: include/sysemu/hax.h target/i386/hax-* V2: Add HAXM github page for wiki and issue tracking. Cc: Wenchao Wang Cc: Hang Yuan Reviewed-by: Hang Yuan Signed-off-by: Colin Xu Message-Id: <20200228012046.6629-1-colin...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- MAINTAINERS | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 32867bc..a88bc28 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -436,6 +436,17 @@ F: include/hw/block/dataplane/xen* F: include/hw/xen/ F: include/sysemu/xen-mapcache.h +Guest CPU Cores (HAXM) +- +X86 HAXM CPUs +M: Wenchao Wang +M: Colin Xu +L: haxm-t...@intel.com +W: https://github.com/intel/haxm/issues +S: Maintained +F: include/sysemu/hax.h +F: target/i386/hax-* + Hosts - LINUX -- Best Regards, Colin Xu