Re: [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:30:46AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 01/27/2011 02:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >Before creating rc1 we need to make sure that all patches for 0.14 have > >been reviewed and applied. > > > >Please reply to this message with a subject starting with "[PING 0.14]" > >and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or "[PULL 0.14]" for tree > >pulls. Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also start > >having "[PATCH 0.14]", too. > > > >Myself I have only > > > >http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/88490 > > > >to ping. :) It is in branch qemu-char-echo of > >git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git as well. > > > >Thanks! > > This is a good idea, thanks for doing this! > http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg50368.html -- Gleb.
Re: [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
On (Thu) Jan 27 2011 [09:29:36], Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Before creating rc1 we need to make sure that all patches for 0.14 have > been reviewed and applied. > > Please reply to this message with a subject starting with "[PING 0.14]" > and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or "[PULL 0.14]" for tree > pulls. Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also start > having "[PATCH 0.14]", too. I have the following pull request for virtio-serial: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91054 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/qemu/amit/virtio-serial.git for-anthony >From the orig. mail: Please pull for fixes to the virtio-serial code: - Don't copy over guest buffer to host (prevents potential DoS scenarios, pointed out by Paul Brook) - Add support for flow control - A couple of trivial fixes to virtio-console code Amit
Re: [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
On 01/27/2011 02:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Before creating rc1 we need to make sure that all patches for 0.14 have been reviewed and applied. Please reply to this message with a subject starting with "[PING 0.14]" and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or "[PULL 0.14]" for tree pulls. Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also start having "[PATCH 0.14]", too. Myself I have only http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/88490 to ping. :) It is in branch qemu-char-echo of git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git as well. Thanks! This is a good idea, thanks for doing this! Regards, Anthony Liguori Paolo
Re: [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
Markus Armbruster writes: > Paolo Bonzini writes: > >> Before creating rc1 we need to make sure that all patches for 0.14 have >> been reviewed and applied. >> >> Please reply to this message with a subject starting with "[PING 0.14]" >> and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or "[PULL 0.14]" for tree >> pulls. Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also start >> having "[PATCH 0.14]", too. > > All my outstanding patches are routed through Kevin's tree, which means > I can leave this to him. I'm working on a fix for the -drive if=scsi,index=N regression, to be routed through Kevin's tree as well. Should really go into 0.14.
Re: [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
Am 27.01.2011 13:34, schrieb Markus Armbruster: > Paolo Bonzini writes: > >> Before creating rc1 we need to make sure that all patches for 0.14 have >> been reviewed and applied. >> >> Please reply to this message with a subject starting with "[PING 0.14]" >> and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or "[PULL 0.14]" for tree >> pulls. Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also start >> having "[PATCH 0.14]", too. > > All my outstanding patches are routed through Kevin's tree, which means > I can leave this to him. I'll send a last pull request tomorrow or on Monday. Kevin
Re: [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
Paolo Bonzini writes: > Before creating rc1 we need to make sure that all patches for 0.14 have > been reviewed and applied. > > Please reply to this message with a subject starting with "[PING 0.14]" > and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or "[PULL 0.14]" for tree > pulls. Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also start > having "[PATCH 0.14]", too. All my outstanding patches are routed through Kevin's tree, which means I can leave this to him.
