Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] linux-user: pass environment arguments in execve

2016-06-20 Thread Peter Maydell
On 20 June 2016 at 23:15, Joel Holdsworth
 wrote:
> Even so, there is still the issue of the other glibc environment variables -
> see my LANG= example of the parent-guest wanting to run a child-guest
> Japanese, but the child-qemu should still run in English.

That particular example is easy in that I don't think qemu
user-mode cares about LANG at all :-)

Needing to be root to set up a chroot is genuinely awkward,
though. proot (https://github.com/proot-me/PRoot) is one
approach to that which uses and wraps around a stock QEMU
to do many of the things you'd need a chroot for without
requiring root to set it up. (it uses the ptrace API to
intercept various syscalls and fix up paths, etc.)

Mostly I think the set of possible solutions QEMU has to
"run a guest binary" are the way they are for historical
reasons:
 * we have "-L sysroot" which works for simple cases where
   you have the dynamic libraries to hand, but which has
   some bad failure modes if the directory tree you point
   it at is large or has symlinks (including QEMU just
   going into an infinite loop at startup)
 * the chroot approach is the most flexible, and handily
   doesn't need much support in QEMU at all, but needing
   root support to set it up is a pain
and this hasn't much changed in many years.

I think my main concern is that if we add a third model of
how usermode works (or extend one of the existing ones)
that we do it with a clear idea of where we're going with that,
rather than adding bits and pieces ad-hoc. [I haven't read the
rest of this patchset, so this isn't a specific comment
on it, just a general observation.]

We could certainly stand to document things better too.

thanks
-- PMM



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] linux-user: pass environment arguments in execve

2016-06-20 Thread Joel Holdsworth

On 20/06/16 22:40, Peter Maydell wrote:

On 20 June 2016 at 22:27, Joel Holdsworth
 wrote:

The current behaviour was quite unexpected to me - there were no warnings,
and the need to link qemu statically isn't documented anywhere. If you
really believe that static linking is the best answer here, then shouldn't
the shared library option be removed? Because with the shared-library build,
qemu-user is somewhat "broken".

Shared library QEMU works fine for simple use cases ("run a gcc
test case", for instance) or where the guest binary is linked
statically and doesn't much care where it runs.


But the distros won't like that because of the induced bloat.

I don't know of a distro which doesn't ship a statically linked
QEMU offhand. Debian, Ubuntu and SUSE certainly all do. You
basically need it for the chroot case, which is a really common one.
[These days if your distro-in-the-chroot is multiarch you could
put all the dynamic libraries for the QEMU binary in it too,
but in practice being able to just copy a single binary in is much
easier.]

thanks
-- PMM


Fair enough. It sounds like this is the way needs to be!

Even so, there is still the issue of the other glibc environment 
variables - see my LANG= example of the parent-guest wanting to run a 
child-guest Japanese, but the child-qemu should still run in English.




Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] linux-user: pass environment arguments in execve

2016-06-20 Thread Peter Maydell
On 20 June 2016 at 22:27, Joel Holdsworth
 wrote:
> The current behaviour was quite unexpected to me - there were no warnings,
> and the need to link qemu statically isn't documented anywhere. If you
> really believe that static linking is the best answer here, then shouldn't
> the shared library option be removed? Because with the shared-library build,
> qemu-user is somewhat "broken".

Shared library QEMU works fine for simple use cases ("run a gcc
test case", for instance) or where the guest binary is linked
statically and doesn't much care where it runs.

> But the distros won't like that because of the induced bloat.

I don't know of a distro which doesn't ship a statically linked
QEMU offhand. Debian, Ubuntu and SUSE certainly all do. You
basically need it for the chroot case, which is a really common one.
[These days if your distro-in-the-chroot is multiarch you could
put all the dynamic libraries for the QEMU binary in it too,
but in practice being able to just copy a single binary in is much
easier.]

thanks
-- PMM



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] linux-user: pass environment arguments in execve

2016-06-20 Thread Joel Holdsworth

On 20/06/16 21:29, Laurent Vivier wrote:


Le 20/06/2016 à 21:51, Joel Holdsworth a écrit :

On 15/06/16 20:59, Laurent Vivier wrote:

Le 14/06/2016 à 21:26, Joel Holdsworth a écrit :

Previously, when emulating execve(2), qemu would execute a child
instance of the emulator with the environment variables provided by
the parent process. This caused problems with qemu if any of the
variables affected the child emulator's behaviour e.g.
LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

The best way to avoid that is to use a statically linked qemu.

Stepping back a bit; the problem I'm trying to solve is this...

There are some processes that invoke a helper process to do some work
for them e.g. gstreamer's gst-plugin-scanner. Previously qemu would
attempt to execute the helper executable as if it were machine-native,
which won't work. These patches modify qemu so that it will (optionally)
run the child process inside a child instance of qemu.

If the context is to use qemu to have a cross build/test environment, I
like the idea, but you should use chroot/binfmt to do that.

Even without the architecture change, the build/test environment must be
isolated (chroot) from the host environment to know exactly what you
build/test.
I do know what we test though: (a gstreamer unit test) -> 
(gst-plugin-scanner).


chroot+binfmt is a fine solution for testing a whole user-space, but 
rather overkill for just a single program.


Also, chroot and binfmt require root permissions. Also the libraries 
have to be installed in a rootfs tree - which isn't how my use case works.





My experience as a user was that it took a couple of hours of searching
through strace logs to figure out what the issue was. gstreamer would
just fail with a generic error about the helper. These patches are meant
to make qemu do the right thing.

Saying to the user that they should make a static linked build of qemu
isn't very practical. Having a command line argument is a much easier
solution for the user, that doesn't force them not to used
shared-library builds. The distros aren't going to go for that.

You can provide the RPM/DEB with the statically linked qemu.
(it will have no dependencies)


Users could do that, but as far as I'm concerned that isn't really 
satisfactory.


The current behaviour was quite unexpected to me - there were no 
warnings, and the need to link qemu statically isn't documented 
anywhere. If you really believe that static linking is the best answer 
here, then shouldn't the shared library option be removed? Because with 
the shared-library build, qemu-user is somewhat "broken".


But the distros won't like that because of the induced bloat.


Moreover, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is just one example. LD_PRELOAD is another.
Timezone and locale environment variables are also an issue.

all LD_ are for the ld.so, the dynamic loader, and with a statically
linked qemu, you don't use the host ld.so (see ld.so(8)).

Why timezone and local environment variables are also an issue?
All these environment variables affect the behaviour of qemu's glibc - 
these are examples of the the parent-guest being able to modify the 
behaviour of the child-host if the execve qemu wrapper patch is 
integrated. The correct way to pass the execve environ to the child qemu 
wrapper is through -E and -U arguments.



Child qemu instance should just ignore it. Thanks, Laurent 


The child qemu can't control what glibc will respond to.

There are a lot of environment variables that can affect it: 
http://www.scratchbox.org/documentation/general/tutorials/glibcenv.html


For example with LANG=, the parent-guest process might want to run the 
child-guest in Japanese, but the child-qemu should still run in English.





Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] linux-user: pass environment arguments in execve

2016-06-20 Thread Laurent Vivier


Le 20/06/2016 à 21:51, Joel Holdsworth a écrit :
> On 15/06/16 20:59, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>> Le 14/06/2016 à 21:26, Joel Holdsworth a écrit :
>>> Previously, when emulating execve(2), qemu would execute a child
>>> instance of the emulator with the environment variables provided by
>>> the parent process. This caused problems with qemu if any of the
>>> variables affected the child emulator's behaviour e.g.
>>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
>> The best way to avoid that is to use a statically linked qemu.
> 
> Stepping back a bit; the problem I'm trying to solve is this...
> 
> There are some processes that invoke a helper process to do some work
> for them e.g. gstreamer's gst-plugin-scanner. Previously qemu would
> attempt to execute the helper executable as if it were machine-native,
> which won't work. These patches modify qemu so that it will (optionally)
> run the child process inside a child instance of qemu.

If the context is to use qemu to have a cross build/test environment, I
like the idea, but you should use chroot/binfmt to do that.

Even without the architecture change, the build/test environment must be
isolated (chroot) from the host environment to know exactly what you
build/test.

> 
> My experience as a user was that it took a couple of hours of searching
> through strace logs to figure out what the issue was. gstreamer would
> just fail with a generic error about the helper. These patches are meant
> to make qemu do the right thing.
> 
> Saying to the user that they should make a static linked build of qemu
> isn't very practical. Having a command line argument is a much easier
> solution for the user, that doesn't force them not to used
> shared-library builds. The distros aren't going to go for that.

You can provide the RPM/DEB with the statically linked qemu.
(it will have no dependencies)

> Moreover, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is just one example. LD_PRELOAD is another.
> Timezone and locale environment variables are also an issue.

all LD_ are for the ld.so, the dynamic loader, and with a statically
linked qemu, you don't use the host ld.so (see ld.so(8)).

Why timezone and local environment variables are also an issue?

> In an ideal world, it wouldn't even be necessary to add an argument -
> qemu would just do the right thing automatically. Though I'm not sure
> how that could be done correctly, so a command line option is a good
> compromise for a starting point.
> 
> 
>>
>>> This patch solves this issue by passing the environment variables
>>> with '-E' arguments to the child qemu instance. The call to
>>> execve(2) is replaced by a call to execv(2) so that the parent
>>> emulator's environment variable state is propagated into the child.
>>>
>>> Any variables from the host environment that are not in the in the
>>> execve() call are removed with a '-U' argument.
>> Run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patch...
>>
>> and add your Signed-off-by here.
> Sure ok.
> 
> 
>> The environment is already managed in linux-user/main.c:main(), I don't
>> understand why the qemu_execve() special case should differ from the
>> general case.
> Maybe I've missed something, but the problem I'm trying to solve here is
> the issue of correctly propagating the guest environment variables into
> the child process.
> 
> The parent guest process (running inside qemu-user) constructs a set of
> environment variables and passes them to execve. However, if the parent
> qemu-user decides to run a child instance of qemu-user it should run
> with the same environment variables as the parent, but with environment
> variables the parent-guest passed through the arguments for the
> child-guest.
> 
> If gstreamer decides to run gst-plugin-scanner with a certain environ,
> that is for the child qemu guest, not the child qemu instance itself.

Child qemu instance should just ignore it.

Thanks,
Laurent



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] linux-user: pass environment arguments in execve

2016-06-20 Thread Riku Voipio
   20.6.2016 22.51 Joel Holdsworth 
   kirjoitti:
   >
   > On 15/06/16 20:59, Laurent Vivier wrote:
   > >
   > > Le 14/06/2016 `a 21:26, Joel Holdsworth a ecrit :
   > >> Previously, when emulating execve(2), qemu would execute a child
   > >> instance of the emulator with the environment variables provided
   by
   > >> the parent process. This caused problems with qemu if any of the
   > >> variables affected the child emulator's behaviour e.g.
   > >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
   > > The best way to avoid that is to use a statically linked qemu.
   >
   > Stepping back a bit; the problem I'm trying to solve is this...
   >
   > There are some processes that invoke a helper process to do some work
   > for them e.g. gstreamer's gst-plugin-scanner. Previously qemu would
   > attempt to execute the helper executable as if it were
   machine-native,
   > which won't work. These patches modify qemu so that it will
   (optionally)
   > run the child process inside a child instance of qemu.
   >
   > My experience as a user was that it took a couple of hours of
   searching
   > through strace logs to figure out what the issue was. gstreamer would
   > just fail with a generic error about the helper. These patches are
   meant
   > to make qemu do the right thing.
   >
   > Saying to the user that they should make a static linked build of
   qemu
   > isn't very practical. Having a command line argument is a much easier
   > solution for the user, that doesn't force them not to used
   > shared-library builds. The distros aren't going to go for that.

   Actually at least Debian and Ubuntu already ship static qemu-user
   binaries. Using static qemu-user and binfmt_misc is the standard way
   people use qemu-user.

   >
   > Moreover, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is just one example. LD_PRELOAD is another.
   > Timezone and locale environment variables are also an issue.
   >
   > In an ideal world, it wouldn't even be necessary to add an argument -
   > qemu would just do the right thing automatically. Though I'm not sure
   > how that could be done correctly, so a command line option is a good
   > compromise for a starting point.
   >
   >
   > >
   > >> This patch solves this issue by passing the environment variables
   > >> with '-E' arguments to the child qemu instance. The call to
   > >> execve(2) is replaced by a call to execv(2) so that the parent
   > >> emulator's environment variable state is propagated into the
   child.
   > >>
   > >> Any variables from the host environment that are not in the in the
   > >> execve() call are removed with a '-U' argument.
   > > Run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patch...
   > >
   > > and add your Signed-off-by here.
   > Sure ok.
   >
   >
   > > The environment is already managed in linux-user/main.c:main(), I
   don't
   > > understand why the qemu_execve() special case should differ from
   the
   > > general case.
   > Maybe I've missed something, but the problem I'm trying to solve here
   is
   > the issue of correctly propagating the guest environment variables
   into
   > the child process.
   >
   > The parent guest process (running inside qemu-user) constructs a set
   of
   > environment variables and passes them to execve. However, if the
   parent
   > qemu-user decides to run a child instance of qemu-user it should run
   > with the same environment variables as the parent, but with
   environment
   > variables the parent-guest passed through the arguments for the
   child-guest.
   >
   > If gstreamer decides to run gst-plugin-scanner with a certain
   environ,
   > that is for the child qemu guest, not the child qemu instance itself.
   >
   >


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] linux-user: pass environment arguments in execve

2016-06-20 Thread Joel Holdsworth

On 15/06/16 20:59, Laurent Vivier wrote:


Le 14/06/2016 à 21:26, Joel Holdsworth a écrit :

Previously, when emulating execve(2), qemu would execute a child
instance of the emulator with the environment variables provided by
the parent process. This caused problems with qemu if any of the
variables affected the child emulator's behaviour e.g.
LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

The best way to avoid that is to use a statically linked qemu.


Stepping back a bit; the problem I'm trying to solve is this...

There are some processes that invoke a helper process to do some work 
for them e.g. gstreamer's gst-plugin-scanner. Previously qemu would 
attempt to execute the helper executable as if it were machine-native, 
which won't work. These patches modify qemu so that it will (optionally) 
run the child process inside a child instance of qemu.


My experience as a user was that it took a couple of hours of searching 
through strace logs to figure out what the issue was. gstreamer would 
just fail with a generic error about the helper. These patches are meant 
to make qemu do the right thing.


Saying to the user that they should make a static linked build of qemu 
isn't very practical. Having a command line argument is a much easier 
solution for the user, that doesn't force them not to used 
shared-library builds. The distros aren't going to go for that.


Moreover, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is just one example. LD_PRELOAD is another. 
Timezone and locale environment variables are also an issue.


In an ideal world, it wouldn't even be necessary to add an argument - 
qemu would just do the right thing automatically. Though I'm not sure 
how that could be done correctly, so a command line option is a good 
compromise for a starting point.






This patch solves this issue by passing the environment variables
with '-E' arguments to the child qemu instance. The call to
execve(2) is replaced by a call to execv(2) so that the parent
emulator's environment variable state is propagated into the child.

Any variables from the host environment that are not in the in the
execve() call are removed with a '-U' argument.

Run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patch...

and add your Signed-off-by here.

Sure ok.



The environment is already managed in linux-user/main.c:main(), I don't
understand why the qemu_execve() special case should differ from the
general case.
Maybe I've missed something, but the problem I'm trying to solve here is 
the issue of correctly propagating the guest environment variables into 
the child process.


The parent guest process (running inside qemu-user) constructs a set of 
environment variables and passes them to execve. However, if the parent 
qemu-user decides to run a child instance of qemu-user it should run 
with the same environment variables as the parent, but with environment 
variables the parent-guest passed through the arguments for the child-guest.


If gstreamer decides to run gst-plugin-scanner with a certain environ, 
that is for the child qemu guest, not the child qemu instance itself.






Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] linux-user: pass environment arguments in execve

2016-06-15 Thread Laurent Vivier


Le 14/06/2016 à 21:26, Joel Holdsworth a écrit :
> Previously, when emulating execve(2), qemu would execute a child
> instance of the emulator with the environment variables provided by
> the parent process. This caused problems with qemu if any of the
> variables affected the child emulator's behaviour e.g.
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

The best way to avoid that is to use a statically linked qemu.

> This patch solves this issue by passing the environment variables
> with '-E' arguments to the child qemu instance. The call to
> execve(2) is replaced by a call to execv(2) so that the parent
> emulator's environment variable state is propagated into the child.
> 
> Any variables from the host environment that are not in the in the
> execve() call are removed with a '-U' argument.

Run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patch...

and add your Signed-off-by here.

The environment is already managed in linux-user/main.c:main(), I don't
understand why the qemu_execve() special case should differ from the
general case.

Thanks,
Laurent