Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/18] virtio-scsi: process control queue requests

2012-02-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 02/24/2012 08:54 AM, Hu Tao wrote:
> diff --git a/hw/virtio-scsi.c b/hw/virtio-scsi.c
> index 380073a..1f3b851 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio-scsi.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio-scsi.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static VirtIOSCSIReq *virtio_scsi_pop_req(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
> VirtQueue *vq)
>  
>  static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
>  {
> -SCSIDevice *d = virtio_scsi_device_find(s, req->req.cmd->lun);
> +SCSIDevice *d = virtio_scsi_device_find(s, req->req.tmf->lun);
>  SCSIRequest *r, *next;
>  DeviceState *qdev;
>  int target;
> @@ -253,11 +253,11 @@ static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
> VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
>  if (!d) {
>  goto fail;
>  }
> -if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.cmd->lun)) {
> +if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.tmf->lun)) {
>  goto incorrect_lun;
>  }
>  QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(r, &d->requests, next, next) {
> -if (r->tag == req->req.cmd->tag) {
> +if (r->tag == req->req.tmf->tag) {
>  break;
>  }
>  }
> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
> VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
>  if (!d) {
>  goto fail;
>  }
> -if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.cmd->lun)) {
> +if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.tmf->lun)) {
>  goto incorrect_lun;
>  }
>  s->resetting++;
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
> VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
>  if (!d) {
>  goto fail;
>  }
> -if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.cmd->lun)) {
> +if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.tmf->lun)) {
>  goto incorrect_lun;
>  }
>  QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(r, &d->requests, next, next) {
> @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
> VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
>  break;
>  
>  case VIRTIO_SCSI_T_TMF_I_T_NEXUS_RESET:
> -target = req->req.cmd->lun[1];
> +target = req->req.tmf->lun[1];
>  s->resetting++;
>  QTAILQ_FOREACH(qdev, &s->bus.qbus.children, sibling) {
>   d = DO_UPCAST(SCSIDevice, qdev, qdev);

This is now fixed on github.

Paolo



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/18] virtio-scsi: process control queue requests

2012-02-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 02/24/2012 08:54 AM, Hu Tao wrote:
> should be req->req.tmf->lun here and elsewhere in this function?

Yes, good catch!

Paolo




Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/18] virtio-scsi: process control queue requests

2012-02-23 Thread Hu Tao
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 03:33:52PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini 
> ---
>  hw/virtio-scsi.c |  134 ++---
>  1 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/virtio-scsi.c b/hw/virtio-scsi.c
> index f4eb8c7..380073a 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio-scsi.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio-scsi.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ typedef struct {
>  VirtQueue *cmd_vq;
>  uint32_t sense_size;
>  uint32_t cdb_size;
> +int resetting;
>  } VirtIOSCSI;
>  
>  typedef struct VirtIOSCSIReq {
> @@ -236,15 +237,104 @@ static VirtIOSCSIReq *virtio_scsi_pop_req(VirtIOSCSI 
> *s, VirtQueue *vq)
>  return req;
>  }
>  
> -static void virtio_scsi_fail_ctrl_req(VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
> +static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
>  {
> -if (req->req.tmf->type == VIRTIO_SCSI_T_TMF) {
> -req->resp.tmf->response = VIRTIO_SCSI_S_FAILURE;
> -} else {
> -req->resp.an->response = VIRTIO_SCSI_S_FAILURE;
> +SCSIDevice *d = virtio_scsi_device_find(s, req->req.cmd->lun);

should be req->req.tmf->lun here and elsewhere in this function?

diff --git a/hw/virtio-scsi.c b/hw/virtio-scsi.c
index 380073a..1f3b851 100644
--- a/hw/virtio-scsi.c
+++ b/hw/virtio-scsi.c
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static VirtIOSCSIReq *virtio_scsi_pop_req(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
VirtQueue *vq)
 
 static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
 {
-SCSIDevice *d = virtio_scsi_device_find(s, req->req.cmd->lun);
+SCSIDevice *d = virtio_scsi_device_find(s, req->req.tmf->lun);
 SCSIRequest *r, *next;
 DeviceState *qdev;
 int target;
@@ -253,11 +253,11 @@ static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
 if (!d) {
 goto fail;
 }
-if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.cmd->lun)) {
+if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.tmf->lun)) {
 goto incorrect_lun;
 }
 QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(r, &d->requests, next, next) {
-if (r->tag == req->req.cmd->tag) {
+if (r->tag == req->req.tmf->tag) {
 break;
 }
 }
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, VirtIOSCSIReq 
*req)
 if (!d) {
 goto fail;
 }
-if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.cmd->lun)) {
+if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.tmf->lun)) {
 goto incorrect_lun;
 }
 s->resetting++;
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, VirtIOSCSIReq 
*req)
 if (!d) {
 goto fail;
 }
-if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.cmd->lun)) {
+if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.tmf->lun)) {
 goto incorrect_lun;
 }
 QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(r, &d->requests, next, next) {
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, VirtIOSCSIReq 
*req)
 break;
 
 case VIRTIO_SCSI_T_TMF_I_T_NEXUS_RESET:
-target = req->req.cmd->lun[1];
+target = req->req.tmf->lun[1];
 s->resetting++;
 QTAILQ_FOREACH(qdev, &s->bus.qbus.children, sibling) {
  d = DO_UPCAST(SCSIDevice, qdev, qdev);

-- 
Thanks,
Hu Tao