Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 6/8] scsi: account unmap operations

2018-10-08 Thread Anton Nefedov


On 4/10/2018 6:47 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 21.08.2018 um 11:46 hat Anton Nefedov geschrieben:
>> Signed-off-by: Anton Nefedov 
>> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 
>> Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia 
>> ---
>>   hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c | 9 -
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
>> index 9d10daf..0aac137 100644
>> --- a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
>> +++ b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
>> @@ -1664,6 +1664,10 @@ static void scsi_unmap_complete_noio(UnmapCBData 
>> *data, int ret)
>>   goto done;
>>   }
>>   
>> +block_acct_start(blk_get_stats(s->qdev.conf.blk), >acct,
>> + r->sector_count * s->qdev.blocksize,
>> + BLOCK_ACCT_UNMAP);
> 
> If the check just above this (check_lba_range) fails, we should account
> for an invalid request.
> 

Done.

>>   r->req.aiocb = blk_aio_pdiscard(s->qdev.conf.blk,
>>   r->sector * s->qdev.blocksize,
>>   r->sector_count * 
>> s->qdev.blocksize,
>> @@ -1690,10 +1694,11 @@ static void scsi_unmap_complete(void *opaque, int 
>> ret)
>>   r->req.aiocb = NULL;
>>   
>>   aio_context_acquire(blk_get_aio_context(s->qdev.conf.blk));
>> -if (scsi_disk_req_check_error(r, ret, false)) {
>> +if (scsi_disk_req_check_error(r, ret, true)) {
>>   scsi_req_unref(>req);
>>   g_free(data);
>>   } else {
>> +block_acct_done(blk_get_stats(s->qdev.conf.blk), >acct);
>>   scsi_unmap_complete_noio(data, ret);
>>   }
>>   aio_context_release(blk_get_aio_context(s->qdev.conf.blk));
>> @@ -1740,10 +1745,12 @@ static void scsi_disk_emulate_unmap(SCSIDiskReq *r, 
>> uint8_t *inbuf)
>>   return;
>>   
>>   invalid_param_len:
>> +block_acct_invalid(blk_get_stats(s->qdev.conf.blk), BLOCK_ACCT_UNMAP);
>>   scsi_check_condition(r, SENSE_CODE(INVALID_PARAM_LEN));
>>   return;
>>   
>>   invalid_field:
>> +block_acct_invalid(blk_get_stats(s->qdev.conf.blk), BLOCK_ACCT_UNMAP);
>>   scsi_check_condition(r, SENSE_CODE(INVALID_FIELD));
>>   }
> 
> What about the blk_is_read_only() case which directly returns without
> jumping to one of the error labels?
> 

So basically anything we don't bring to blk layer is invalid req.
Fixed.


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 6/8] scsi: account unmap operations

2018-10-04 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 21.08.2018 um 11:46 hat Anton Nefedov geschrieben:
> Signed-off-by: Anton Nefedov 
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 
> Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia 
> ---
>  hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c | 9 -
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
> index 9d10daf..0aac137 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
> @@ -1664,6 +1664,10 @@ static void scsi_unmap_complete_noio(UnmapCBData 
> *data, int ret)
>  goto done;
>  }
>  
> +block_acct_start(blk_get_stats(s->qdev.conf.blk), >acct,
> + r->sector_count * s->qdev.blocksize,
> + BLOCK_ACCT_UNMAP);

If the check just above this (check_lba_range) fails, we should account
for an invalid request.

>  r->req.aiocb = blk_aio_pdiscard(s->qdev.conf.blk,
>  r->sector * s->qdev.blocksize,
>  r->sector_count * s->qdev.blocksize,
> @@ -1690,10 +1694,11 @@ static void scsi_unmap_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
>  r->req.aiocb = NULL;
>  
>  aio_context_acquire(blk_get_aio_context(s->qdev.conf.blk));
> -if (scsi_disk_req_check_error(r, ret, false)) {
> +if (scsi_disk_req_check_error(r, ret, true)) {
>  scsi_req_unref(>req);
>  g_free(data);
>  } else {
> +block_acct_done(blk_get_stats(s->qdev.conf.blk), >acct);
>  scsi_unmap_complete_noio(data, ret);
>  }
>  aio_context_release(blk_get_aio_context(s->qdev.conf.blk));
> @@ -1740,10 +1745,12 @@ static void scsi_disk_emulate_unmap(SCSIDiskReq *r, 
> uint8_t *inbuf)
>  return;
>  
>  invalid_param_len:
> +block_acct_invalid(blk_get_stats(s->qdev.conf.blk), BLOCK_ACCT_UNMAP);
>  scsi_check_condition(r, SENSE_CODE(INVALID_PARAM_LEN));
>  return;
>  
>  invalid_field:
> +block_acct_invalid(blk_get_stats(s->qdev.conf.blk), BLOCK_ACCT_UNMAP);
>  scsi_check_condition(r, SENSE_CODE(INVALID_FIELD));
>  }

What about the blk_is_read_only() case which directly returns without
jumping to one of the error labels?

Kevin