Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 2/2] console: add screendump-device qmp cmd
On 06/18/2013 03:24 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: We have a job API in the block layer. Would it make sense to have a QMP-level job interface? I'd agree with this. Something like the attached patch? Which is just the bare minimum I'll need for screendump. Basically a one-off bottom half with some monitor infrastructure (job id, error handling). So it isn't for big jobs, but for small jobs which have to wait for something before they execute (spice-server, guest action, whatever). If you wanna some more context: screendump on top of that is here: https://www.kraxel.org/cgit/qemu/log/?h=rebase/pixman + +void monitor_job_cancel(monitor_job *job) +{ +monitor_job_event(job, canceled, NULL); +if (job-bh) { +qemu_bh_delete(job-bh); +} +g_free(job); +} What calls this command? diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json index aced724..a449a43 100644 --- a/qapi-schema.json +++ b/qapi-schema.json @@ -2515,6 +2515,16 @@ 'str': 'str' } } ## +# @MonitorJob +# +# Monitor job id. +# No mention of @job-id? +# Since 1.6 +## +{ 'type': 'MonitorJob', + 'data': { 'job-id': 'int' } } For a type, this looks okay; but where are the commands that use this type? I take it new commands (like screendump) would return a MonitorJob, and that we need a query-monitor-jobs as well as a monitor-job-cancel. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 2/2] console: add screendump-device qmp cmd
On 06/17/2013 08:01 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: Adds a screendump-device qmp command, which has an additional 'device' parameter. This way it is possible to specify the device you want a screendump from. For the hmp monitor an optional device parameter has been added to the esisting screendump command. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903910 Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com --- qapi-schema.json | 15 +++ qmp-commands.hx | 25 + ui/console.c | 52 3 files changed, 92 insertions(+) diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json index adcf801..719dc6e 100644 --- a/qapi-schema.json +++ b/qapi-schema.json @@ -3125,6 +3125,21 @@ { 'command': 'screendump', 'data': {'filename': 'str'} } ## +# @screendump-device: +# +# Write a PPM from the specified device to a file. +# +# @filename: the path of a new PPM file to store the image +# @device: #optional device to take the screenshot from +# +# Returns: Nothing on success +# +# Since: 1.6 +## +{ 'command': 'screendump-device', 'data': {'filename': 'str', + '*device' : 'str' }} Does this command need to return a job id, and does there need to be an event when it is completed? Can filename include /dev/fdset (that is, the file is opened via qemu_open, so we can use fd passing to pass in a pipe fd rather than requiring a trip through the filesystem)? + +static void qmp_screendump_bh(void *opaque) +{ +Error *local_err; +struct screendump_job *j = opaque; +DisplaySurface *surface; + +surface = qemu_console_surface(j-con); +ppm_save(j-filename, surface, local_err); Yes, ppm_save uses qemu_open(), so fd passing should be possible. +/* TODO: send qmp completion (or error) event */ Aha, this explains why it is still rfc. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 2/2] console: add screendump-device qmp cmd
Hi, Maybe we really should do a proper QMP jobs API. Using a BH makes sense for the screenshot case but is orthogonal to the QMP job API. I'll drop that from my todo list for now. No way I can finish this off before my family summer vacation. I'm also hoping that someone who knows qapi + jobs stuff better than me picks this up. Should that not happen I might be able to have a closer look somewhen in august ... cheers, Gerd
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 2/2] console: add screendump-device qmp cmd
On 06/17/13 16:50, Luiz Capitulino wrote: +struct screendump_job { +QEMUBH *bh; +QemuConsole *con; +char *filename; +}; We have a job API in the block layer. Would it make sense to have a QMP-level job interface? I'd agree with this. Something like the attached patch? Which is just the bare minimum I'll need for screendump. Basically a one-off bottom half with some monitor infrastructure (job id, error handling). So it isn't for big jobs, but for small jobs which have to wait for something before they execute (spice-server, guest action, whatever). If you wanna some more context: screendump on top of that is here: https://www.kraxel.org/cgit/qemu/log/?h=rebase/pixman [ not tested yet ] cheers, Gerd From bf1f7ec8a2baacc497e188ac38b24e5b0387b143 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:21:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [draft] monitor job Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com --- include/monitor/monitor.h | 10 +++ monitor.c | 66 + qapi-schema.json | 10 +++ 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/monitor/monitor.h b/include/monitor/monitor.h index 1a6cfcf..6f5ec7e 100644 --- a/include/monitor/monitor.h +++ b/include/monitor/monitor.h @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ typedef enum MonitorEvent { QEVENT_BALLOON_CHANGE, QEVENT_SPICE_MIGRATE_COMPLETED, QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED, +QEVENT_JOB_COMPLETED, /* Add to 'monitor_event_names' array in monitor.c when * defining new events here */ @@ -100,4 +101,13 @@ int monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add(int64_t fdset_id, int dup_fd); int monitor_fdset_dup_fd_remove(int dup_fd); int monitor_fdset_dup_fd_find(int dup_fd); +typedef struct monitor_job monitor_job; +typedef void (*monitor_job_func)(void *opaque, Error **errp); + +uint64_t monitor_job_new_id(void); +monitor_job *monitor_job_alloc(uint64_t id, monitor_job_func func, + void *opaque); +void monitor_job_queue(monitor_job *job); +void monitor_job_cancel(monitor_job *job); + #endif /* !MONITOR_H */ diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c index 70ae8f5..9a25c1e 100644 --- a/monitor.c +++ b/monitor.c @@ -496,6 +496,7 @@ static const char *monitor_event_names[] = { [QEVENT_BALLOON_CHANGE] = BALLOON_CHANGE, [QEVENT_SPICE_MIGRATE_COMPLETED] = SPICE_MIGRATE_COMPLETED, [QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED] = GUEST_PANICKED, +[QEVENT_JOB_COMPLETED] = JOB_COMPLETED, }; QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(monitor_event_names) != QEVENT_MAX) @@ -4863,3 +4864,68 @@ QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts = { { /* end of list */ } }, }; + +struct monitor_job { +uint64_t id; +monitor_job_func func; +void *opaque; +QEMUBH *bh; +}; + +static void monitor_job_event(monitor_job *job, const char *result, Error *err) +{ +QObject *data; + +data = qobject_from_jsonf({ 'job-id': % PRId64 , 'result': %s }, + job-id, result); +if (error_is_set(err)) { +/* TODO: add error details */ +} +monitor_protocol_event(QEVENT_JOB_COMPLETED, data); +qobject_decref(data); +} + +static void monitor_job_bh(void *opaque) +{ +monitor_job *job = opaque; +Error *local_err = NULL; +const char *result; + +job-func(job-opaque, local_err); +result = error_is_set(local_err) ? success : failure; +monitor_job_event(job, result, local_err); +qemu_bh_delete(job-bh); +g_free(job); +} + +uint64_t monitor_job_new_id(void) +{ +static uint64_t nextid = 1; +return nextid++; +} + +monitor_job *monitor_job_alloc(uint64_t id, monitor_job_func func, + void *opaque) +{ +monitor_job *job = g_new0(monitor_job, 1); + +job-id = id; +job-func = func; +job-opaque = opaque; +return job; +} + +void monitor_job_queue(monitor_job *job) +{ +job-bh = qemu_bh_new(monitor_job_bh, job); +qemu_bh_schedule(job-bh); +} + +void monitor_job_cancel(monitor_job *job) +{ +monitor_job_event(job, canceled, NULL); +if (job-bh) { +qemu_bh_delete(job-bh); +} +g_free(job); +} diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json index aced724..a449a43 100644 --- a/qapi-schema.json +++ b/qapi-schema.json @@ -2515,6 +2515,16 @@ 'str': 'str' } } ## +# @MonitorJob +# +# Monitor job id. +# +# Since 1.6 +## +{ 'type': 'MonitorJob', + 'data': { 'job-id': 'int' } } + +## # @NetdevUserOptions # # Use the user mode network stack which requires no administrator privilege to -- 1.7.9.7
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 2/2] console: add screendump-device qmp cmd
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:24:54 +0200 Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/17/13 16:50, Luiz Capitulino wrote: +struct screendump_job { +QEMUBH *bh; +QemuConsole *con; +char *filename; +}; We have a job API in the block layer. Would it make sense to have a QMP-level job interface? I'd agree with this. Something like the attached patch? Which is just the bare minimum I'll need for screendump. Basically a one-off bottom half with some monitor infrastructure (job id, error handling). So it isn't for big jobs, but for small jobs which have to wait for something before they execute (spice-server, guest action, whatever). I only skimmed over the patch, but you need QMP commands to cancel and to query running jobs. Also, please move all this stuff to qmp.c and do s/monitor/qmp rename. Lastly, is it possible to have the block job QMP API on top of this new QMP job API?
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 2/2] console: add screendump-device qmp cmd
Hi, Something like the attached patch? Which is just the bare minimum I'll need for screendump. Basically a one-off bottom half with some monitor infrastructure (job id, error handling). So it isn't for big jobs, but for small jobs which have to wait for something before they execute (spice-server, guest action, whatever). I only skimmed over the patch, but you need QMP commands to cancel and to query running jobs. Sure, can easily go on top, just need to stuff the monitor_jobs into a list and allow ops on it. Just want to make sure the direction I'm heading to is fine. Also, please move all this stuff to qmp.c and do s/monitor/qmp rename. Will do. Lastly, is it possible to have the block job QMP API on top of this new QMP job API? Don't think so. As mentioned above this does short-running jobs as bottom half whereas block jobs are running in coroutines ... cheers, Gerd
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 2/2] console: add screendump-device qmp cmd
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 03:24:33PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: Hi, Something like the attached patch? Which is just the bare minimum I'll need for screendump. Basically a one-off bottom half with some monitor infrastructure (job id, error handling). So it isn't for big jobs, but for small jobs which have to wait for something before they execute (spice-server, guest action, whatever). I only skimmed over the patch, but you need QMP commands to cancel and to query running jobs. Sure, can easily go on top, just need to stuff the monitor_jobs into a list and allow ops on it. Just want to make sure the direction I'm heading to is fine. Also, please move all this stuff to qmp.c and do s/monitor/qmp rename. Will do. Lastly, is it possible to have the block job QMP API on top of this new QMP job API? Don't think so. As mentioned above this does short-running jobs as bottom half whereas block jobs are running in coroutines ... Maybe we really should do a proper QMP jobs API. Using a BH makes sense for the screenshot case but is orthogonal to the QMP job API. It may be possible to map block jobs onto the QMP jobs API. Of course the blockjob-specific QMP APIs will remain for compatibility. Here's a quick overview of blockjob commands to give a feel for their scope: drive-mirror args... Starts a block job and returns nothing. Note that blockjobs do not have ids because they are bound 1:1 with a block device. This was a design mistake, we should really allow for multiple jobs per block device. query-block-jobs Return info on active block jobs. block-job-cancel Mark a block job as cancelled. It will cancel at the earliest opportunity. QMP Events BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED and BLOCK_JOB_CANCELLED Async events. QMP Event BLOCK_JOB_ERROR Error reporting with BlockDevOnError error handling policy information (i.e. is the job paused waiting for the administrator to fix storage and then continue it?). Stefan
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 2/2] console: add screendump-device qmp cmd
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes: Adds a screendump-device qmp command, which has an additional 'device' parameter. This way it is possible to specify the device you want a screendump from. For the hmp monitor an optional device parameter has been added to the esisting screendump command. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903910 Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com --- qapi-schema.json | 15 +++ qmp-commands.hx | 25 + ui/console.c | 52 3 files changed, 92 insertions(+) diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json index adcf801..719dc6e 100644 --- a/qapi-schema.json +++ b/qapi-schema.json @@ -3125,6 +3125,21 @@ { 'command': 'screendump', 'data': {'filename': 'str'} } ## +# @screendump-device: +# +# Write a PPM from the specified device to a file. +# +# @filename: the path of a new PPM file to store the image +# @device: #optional device to take the screenshot from +# +# Returns: Nothing on success +# +# Since: 1.6 +## +{ 'command': 'screendump-device', 'data': {'filename': 'str', + '*device' : 'str' }} + +## # @nbd-server-start: # # Start an NBD server listening on the given host and port. Block diff --git a/qmp-commands.hx b/qmp-commands.hx index 8e69fba..6361561 100644 --- a/qmp-commands.hx +++ b/qmp-commands.hx @@ -167,6 +167,31 @@ Example: EQMP { +.name = screendump-device, +.args_type = filename:F,device:B?, +.mhandler.cmd_new = qmp_marshal_input_screendump_device, +}, + +SQMP +screendump-device +- + +Save screen into PPM image. + +Arguments: + +- filename: file path (json-string) +- device: video device (json-string, optional) + +Example: + +- { execute: screendump-device, + arguments: { filename: /tmp/image, device : video0 } } +- { return: {} } + +EQMP + +{ .name = stop, .args_type = , .mhandler.cmd_new = qmp_marshal_input_stop, diff --git a/ui/console.c b/ui/console.c index 020805c..1895acf 100644 --- a/ui/console.c +++ b/ui/console.c @@ -343,6 +343,58 @@ void qmp_screendump(const char *filename, Error **errp) ppm_save(filename, surface, errp); } +struct screendump_job { +QEMUBH *bh; +QemuConsole *con; +char *filename; +}; We have a job API in the block layer. Would it make sense to have a QMP-level job interface? I don't think we want to replace the block layer API, but I think having a simple interface that returns a job id, allows querying jobs (including whether they are cancelable), canceling cancelable jobs, and then a single event notifying completion of jobs, would solve a lot of problems in the current interface. Regards, Anthony Liguori +static void qmp_screendump_bh(void *opaque) +{ +Error *local_err; +struct screendump_job *j = opaque; +DisplaySurface *surface; + +surface = qemu_console_surface(j-con); +ppm_save(j-filename, surface, local_err); +/* TODO: send qmp completion (or error) event */ +qemu_bh_delete(j-bh); +free(j-filename); +free(j); +} + +void qmp_screendump_device(const char *filename, + bool has_device, const char *device, Error **errp) +{ +struct screendump_job *j; +QemuConsole *con; + +if (has_device) { +DeviceState *dev = qdev_find_recursive(sysbus_get_default(), device); +if (NULL == dev) { +error_set(errp, QERR_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND, device); +return; +} +con = qemu_console_lookup_by_device(dev); +if (NULL == con) { +error_setg(errp, There is no QemuConsole linked to %s, device); +return; +} +} else { +con = qemu_console_lookup_by_index(0); +if (con == NULL) { +error_setg(errp, There is no QemuConsole I can screendump from.); +return; +} +} + +j = g_new0(struct screendump_job, 1); +j-bh = qemu_bh_new(qmp_screendump_bh, j); +j-con = con; +j-filename = g_strdup(filename); +graphic_hw_update_notify(con, j-bh); +} + void graphic_hw_text_update(QemuConsole *con, console_ch_t *chardata) { if (!con) { -- 1.7.9.7
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 2/2] console: add screendump-device qmp cmd
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:43:07 -0500 Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes: Adds a screendump-device qmp command, which has an additional 'device' parameter. This way it is possible to specify the device you want a screendump from. For the hmp monitor an optional device parameter has been added to the esisting screendump command. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903910 Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com --- qapi-schema.json | 15 +++ qmp-commands.hx | 25 + ui/console.c | 52 3 files changed, 92 insertions(+) diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json index adcf801..719dc6e 100644 --- a/qapi-schema.json +++ b/qapi-schema.json @@ -3125,6 +3125,21 @@ { 'command': 'screendump', 'data': {'filename': 'str'} } ## +# @screendump-device: +# +# Write a PPM from the specified device to a file. +# +# @filename: the path of a new PPM file to store the image +# @device: #optional device to take the screenshot from +# +# Returns: Nothing on success +# +# Since: 1.6 +## +{ 'command': 'screendump-device', 'data': {'filename': 'str', + '*device' : 'str' }} + +## # @nbd-server-start: # # Start an NBD server listening on the given host and port. Block diff --git a/qmp-commands.hx b/qmp-commands.hx index 8e69fba..6361561 100644 --- a/qmp-commands.hx +++ b/qmp-commands.hx @@ -167,6 +167,31 @@ Example: EQMP { +.name = screendump-device, +.args_type = filename:F,device:B?, +.mhandler.cmd_new = qmp_marshal_input_screendump_device, +}, + +SQMP +screendump-device +- + +Save screen into PPM image. + +Arguments: + +- filename: file path (json-string) +- device: video device (json-string, optional) + +Example: + +- { execute: screendump-device, + arguments: { filename: /tmp/image, device : video0 } } +- { return: {} } + +EQMP + +{ .name = stop, .args_type = , .mhandler.cmd_new = qmp_marshal_input_stop, diff --git a/ui/console.c b/ui/console.c index 020805c..1895acf 100644 --- a/ui/console.c +++ b/ui/console.c @@ -343,6 +343,58 @@ void qmp_screendump(const char *filename, Error **errp) ppm_save(filename, surface, errp); } +struct screendump_job { +QEMUBH *bh; +QemuConsole *con; +char *filename; +}; We have a job API in the block layer. Would it make sense to have a QMP-level job interface? I'd agree with this. I don't think we want to replace the block layer API, but I think having a simple interface that returns a job id, allows querying jobs (including whether they are cancelable), canceling cancelable jobs, and then a single event notifying completion of jobs, would solve a lot of problems in the current interface. Regards, Anthony Liguori +static void qmp_screendump_bh(void *opaque) +{ +Error *local_err; +struct screendump_job *j = opaque; +DisplaySurface *surface; + +surface = qemu_console_surface(j-con); +ppm_save(j-filename, surface, local_err); +/* TODO: send qmp completion (or error) event */ +qemu_bh_delete(j-bh); +free(j-filename); +free(j); +} + +void qmp_screendump_device(const char *filename, + bool has_device, const char *device, Error **errp) +{ +struct screendump_job *j; +QemuConsole *con; + +if (has_device) { +DeviceState *dev = qdev_find_recursive(sysbus_get_default(), device); +if (NULL == dev) { +error_set(errp, QERR_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND, device); +return; +} +con = qemu_console_lookup_by_device(dev); +if (NULL == con) { +error_setg(errp, There is no QemuConsole linked to %s, device); +return; +} +} else { +con = qemu_console_lookup_by_index(0); +if (con == NULL) { +error_setg(errp, There is no QemuConsole I can screendump from.); +return; +} +} + +j = g_new0(struct screendump_job, 1); +j-bh = qemu_bh_new(qmp_screendump_bh, j); +j-con = con; +j-filename = g_strdup(filename); +graphic_hw_update_notify(con, j-bh); +} + void graphic_hw_text_update(QemuConsole *con, console_ch_t *chardata) { if (!con) { -- 1.7.9.7