Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug#727756: qemu: Broken -smb with latest SAMBA package. (Unsupported security=share option)

2013-10-26 Thread Michael Tokarev

26.10.2013 13:07, Michael Büsch wrote:

Package: qemu
Version: 1.6.0+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

The smb.conf automatically generated by qemu's -smb option fails on current 
samba,
because smbd rejects the security=share option with the following warning:


   WARNING: Ignoring invalid value 'share' for parameter 'security'


Which makes it fall back to security=user without guest login.
This results in being unable to login to the samba server from the guest OS.

The attached patch fixes this by selecting 'user' explicitly and mapping
unknown users to guest logins.



Index: qemu-1.6.0+dfsg/net/slirp.c
===
--- qemu-1.6.0+dfsg.orig/net/slirp.c
+++ qemu-1.6.0+dfsg/net/slirp.c
@@ -529,7 +529,8 @@ static int slirp_smb(SlirpState* s, cons
 "state directory=%s\n"
 "log file=%s/log.smbd\n"
 "smb passwd file=%s/smbpasswd\n"
-"security = share\n"
+"security = user\n"
+"map to guest = Bad User\n"
 "[qemu]\n"
 "path=%s\n"
 "read only=no\n"

Thank you for the report and the patch Michael.  Are you sure the result
is equivalent?  I mean, it *looks* like okay, because [qemu] share definition -
which looks like this:

[qemu]
path=%s
read only=no
guest ok=yes
force user=%s

explicitly says that guest is okay, and forces user to the
right one.  And it should work the same with other versions
of samba too.

But samba collected so many semi-conflicting options with
years, so I'm not sure anymore.

Also, which users are "bad" -- will it be possible for our
user to "clash" with some built-in/known user?

Cc'ing qemu-devel@ because this needs to be resolved
upstream too.

Thank you again,

/mjt



Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug#727756: qemu: Broken -smb with latest SAMBA package. (Unsupported security=share option)

2013-10-26 Thread Michael Büsch
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:19:29 +0400
Michael Tokarev  wrote:

> Thank you for the report and the patch Michael.  Are you sure the result
> is equivalent?

Well, I am far from being an SMB expert. So I can't really say whether this
is equivalent.
I also posted this patch to the qemu-devel list, but didn't get a reply, yet.

I tested this with a Windows XP client. Without this patch the
client will always ask for username and password. Which I am unable to
supply (smbpasswd is empty after all).
With this patch applied, the share works without authentication. And this
is how it used to work in previous versions, too.

> explicitly says that guest is okay, and forces user to the
> right one.  And it should work the same with other versions
> of samba too.

I only tried this with smbd from sid.
My guess is that it would work on older versions, too. But that is
untested.

> Also, which users are "bad" -- will it be possible for our
> user to "clash" with some built-in/known user?

'bad" users seem to be users that are not in the smbpasswd file.
As qemu creates an empty smbpasswd file, all users probably are "bad".
But I'm not sure if there are exceptions to that.

> Cc'ing qemu-devel@ because this needs to be resolved
> upstream too.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug#727756: qemu: Broken -smb with latest SAMBA package. (Unsupported security=share option)

2013-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev

26.10.2013 20:44, Michael Büsch wrote:
[]

Also, which users are "bad" -- will it be possible for our
user to "clash" with some built-in/known user?


'bad" users seem to be users that are not in the smbpasswd file.
As qemu creates an empty smbpasswd file, all users probably are "bad".


That looks right.  Are you okay adding your Signed-off-by to the patch
you initially submitted?  If yes, I'll make a formal patch submission
upstream.

Because, well, this bothers several people already.

Thank you!

/mjt



Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug#727756: qemu: Broken -smb with latest SAMBA package. (Unsupported security=share option)

2013-11-01 Thread Michael Büsch
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:32:49 +0400
Michael Tokarev  wrote:

> That looks right.  Are you okay adding your Signed-off-by to the patch
> you initially submitted?  If yes, I'll make a formal patch submission
> upstream.

Here you go.
From: Michael Buesch 
Subject: [PATCH] qemu/slirp: Fix SMB security configuration on newer samba versions

The smb.conf automatically generated by qemu's -smb option fails on current
samba, because smbd rejects the security=share option with the following warning:

>   WARNING: Ignoring invalid value 'share' for parameter 'security'  

Which makes it fall back to security=user without guest login.
This results in being unable to login to the samba server from the guest OS.

This fixes it by selecting 'user' explicitly and mapping
unknown users to guest logins.

Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch 

---

Index: qemu-1.6.0+dfsg/net/slirp.c
===
--- qemu-1.6.0+dfsg.orig/net/slirp.c
+++ qemu-1.6.0+dfsg/net/slirp.c
@@ -529,7 +529,8 @@ static int slirp_smb(SlirpState* s, cons
 "state directory=%s\n"
 "log file=%s/log.smbd\n"
 "smb passwd file=%s/smbpasswd\n"
-"security = share\n"
+"security = user\n"
+"map to guest = Bad User\n"
 "[qemu]\n"
 "path=%s\n"
 "read only=no\n"


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature