[Qemu-discuss] Colo perfmance
Hi I am testing QEMU COLO feature described here [QEMU Wiki](http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/COLO). I am testing io performance with iozone in Primary VM. And the io performance wth colo is mucher lower than which without colo when writing a file in Primary VM. Iozone –r 512k –i 0 –i 1 –s 2g –f /home/file_2G not colo: Write: 1544523 Rewrite: 1433098 Read: 696418 Reread: 721802 Colo: Write: 138186 Rewrite: 138286 Read: 1754523 Reread: 1892802 Does anyon have plan to optimize the performance of colo? Any help is appreciated! -- View this message in context: http://qemu.11.n7.nabble.com/Colo-perfmance-tp469053.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[Qemu-discuss] COLO test problem
Hi, I am testing QEMU COLO feature described here [QEMU Wiki](http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/COLO) but I can't login vm in VNC.VNC display "Guest has not initialized the display (yet)." I am using colo-v5.1-developing-COLO-frame-v21-with-shared-disk for test,and VNC can login witout "driver=quorum". Has anyone ever run it successfully? Any help is appreciated! -- View this message in context: http://qemu.11.n7.nabble.com/COLO-test-problem-tp467480.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
