Re: [Qgis-developer] Unique value renderer in New Symbology?
Hi Gary 2. Will there be a unique value renderer in new symbology? I agree, using the categorized symbology with a random color ramp produces not good results (many times with adjacent polygons with the same color), with ugly colors and is not straightforward to use/understand as the unique value renderer. 1. When will old symbology be removed? I hope not before all the features that are available in the old one are ported in the new one. I also give many training courses and what people is mainly missing are: *) the overall transparency slider for all the renderers other then the unique value. Actually in master you can select multiple classes/categories, right click and choose the transparency (that by the way is defined with a 0.0-1-0 interval, where the slider is 0-100%) but again is not very handy (when having many classes) and not very intuitive *) in the old selecting multiple symbology classes allowed the user to change the symbol for all that classes in one go. In the new symbology you can select multiple classes but, if the button change is click then the symbol options are applied only to one of the classes cheers -- Giovanni -- ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Unique value renderer in New Symbology?
*) the overall transparency slider for all the renderers other then the unique value. Actually in master you can select multiple classes/categories, right click and choose the transparency (that by the way is defined with a 0.0-1-0 interval, where the slider is 0-100%) but again is not very handy (when having many classes) and not very intuitive I completely agree :) *) in the old selecting multiple symbology classes allowed the user to change the symbol for all that classes in one go. In the new symbology you can select multiple classes but, if the button change is click then the symbol options are applied only to one of the classes This feature is a most have too. For example when you have to modify the border width of all the classes. At present, you have to modify them one by one or delete them all and recreate them (or open the qml style file if you are a power user and use searchreplace tools ;) Cheers Michael cheers -- Giovanni -- ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Unique value renderer in New Symbology?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/18/2011 08:08 AM, Gary Sherman wrote: The New Symbology doesn't have a unique value renderer which is something that is used very frequently in some disciplines. A couple of questions for those of you fresh from the HF/planning session: 1. When will old symbology be removed? 2. Will there be a unique value renderer in new symbology? +1 to not to remove old symbology until we have 'unique value'. I use this every day. - -- Ivan Mincik, Gista s.r.o. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7GUGMACgkQVqso/9cUsCwZhgCdFqi+SWQ1dIo2wuox0kPLrVPl pMwAoPVbLMI1WIylNccmTX5HEdHOqt/K =jlss -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] translations
Le mercredi 16 novembre 2011 14:15:28, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:37:24 +0100, Otto Dassau das...@gbd-consult.de wrote: In this context, do you think it would be possible to prepare .po files for rst, too? In principle it should only be easier, but I do not know if there are tools ready for this. Perhaps we should get advice from rst and po gurus around. I think it is a crucial issue, as this would make the whole translation process much smoother and enjoyable. All the best. Hello, We can extract text from rst or latex into po files. There are many tools for this and ui web app in Python to manage it. I have no link as I am moving now. If you are really interesting about this I can find them (Francophone ML hava a thread about this also). I am not sure this is the best way to process anyway. Y. -- Yves Jacolin ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Projection widget improvement
+1 and it would be great if I could limit the list of projections to the ones relevant to my work - usually less than 10. I don't need to see projections for the whole world. thanks *Hilmy* On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.itwrote: Il 17/11/2011 10:14, Werner Macho ha scritto: +1 for Richards suggestion .. I also always hit enter after entering http://hub.qgis.org/issues/**4550 http://hub.qgis.org/issues/4550 done, tanks Richard and Werner for ideas. Looks an easy and nice improvement. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini See: http://www.faunalia.it/pc __**_ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developerhttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Re: Qgis-developer Digest, Vol 73, Issue 51 [To GPL or not to GPL]
I understand it *does* mean that you have to be the one sending the source. If you distribute a GPL'd binary without source you have to include a written offer to send the source to any party that receives that binary, even indirectly. In general it should be easier to include the source in the first place No, you need to supply the source to the client (or provide access to it). If the client provides a binary to a third party then it is them who needs to provide the source, not you. You don't have any relationship with the third party - you hold copyright to some of the code, but you have granted the client permission to redistribute it under the GPL. From the GPL FAQ[1]: The reason we require the offer to be valid for any third party is so that people who receive the binaries indirectly in that way can order the source code from you. This may only apply to GPL 2, though, I am not sure. What I am not completely sure is if, besides the users (receivers of modified binaries), the original copyright holders may have a right to the modified sources, even if they haven't received a binary. Say, programmer makes modified version of QGIS for a company, and sends it only to them. The company has a right to the modified sources. Do the original QGIS devs have that right, too? No, they don't. Thought so. Thanks for the clarification. [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
