[Qgis-developer] Inconsistency in methods naming
Hi all, I just noticed minor inconsistency in methods naming in QgsCoordinateTransform class [0]. There is a setSourceCrs (only first letter in upper case in Crs) method and setDestCRS (all letters are upper case in CRS). Should we make them consistent, e.g use Crs everywhere? To prevent API break we can leave exisiting method and mark it as deprecated. [0] http://qgis.org/api/classQgsCoordinateTransform.html -- Alexander Bruy ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Issue with standalone python script and PostGIS Layers
Just a follow up to this if other people ever have trouble with this. I have managed to load my query layers by specifying False for the loadDefaultStyleFlag parameter when I create the QgsVectorLayer. So vlayer = QgsVectorLayer(uri.uri(), layerName, postgres, False) This parameter stops QGIS from checking if there are styles in the database, and thus means that it doesn't run loads of queries that it then doesn't close. QGIS still needs to unload some of the connections that it creates when searching for styles when loading query layers (if you don't specify the False for the loadDefaultStyleFlag), so I believe the bug is still valid, but this is a workaround so that is good. I also wonder if True is the right default for the loadDefaultStyleFlag parameter? It would be good to get details about this parameter added to http://www.qgis.org/en/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/loadlayer.html Is this something I can add myself? James Fra: Stott James Sendt: 24. januar 2014 15:24 Til: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org Emne: SV: [Qgis-developer] Issue with standalone python script and PostGIS Layers Following on from reporting the bug, I have done more digging into the problem. It seems to be related to styleQML lines when I check what connections are being sent to PostGIS. These don't disappear with each loop iteration in Master, but they do in version 2.0. Eventually when my script gets to 100 connections, it hangs. What can I do to make this work? I have updated the bug report with more details, which can be found here https://hub.qgis.org/issues/9357. James Fra: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.orgmailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] På vegne av Stott James Sendt: 16. januar 2014 14:23 Til: Tim Sutton Kopi: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.orgmailto:qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org Emne: Re: [Qgis-developer] Issue with standalone python script and PostGIS Layers Thanks for the response Tim. I have not been destroying my layers. This has not been an issue when running the plugin with 2.0. This was the first thing I thought about in the version running against master so I added the following code to close the postgis layers as it once I am finished with them: QgsMapLayerRegistry.instance().removeMapLayer(layer_id) This has not made it difference. It still hangs at the same place and I still get the warning that there is already too many clients when trying to connect to PostGIS with DB Manager or pgAdmin. Shall I open a bug? Fra: Tim Sutton [mailto:li...@linfiniti.com] Sendt: 16. januar 2014 13:30 Til: Stott James Kopi: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.orgmailto:qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org Emne: Re: [Qgis-developer] Issue with standalone python script and PostGIS Layers Hi On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Stott James fmro...@fylkesmannen.nomailto:fmro...@fylkesmannen.no wrote: Hello all, I have a standalone python script that creates a bunch of PDFs for me. Recently this script has developed an issue. It uses QGIS-dev so it could be related to some of the changes in master recently as it works fine with QGIS 2.0. It makes about 42 PDFs then it stops. It is not actually crashing as such, as you can see it running in task manager. It stays running using between 0 and 2% processor, and fluctuates a little with memory use (around 108840kB). But it does not produce any more PDFs. It is like it is stuck. From the log file that my script creates, I know that it is hanging with this line of code: vlayer = QgsVectorLayer(uri.uri(), layerName, postgres) If I try and connect to the database using DB Manager in QGIS or pgAdmin III while the script is still running, I get an error saying there is already too many clients already. If I kill the process in windows task manager, I am then able to connect to the database using DB manager. Has anyone any suggestions as to what is wrong here? Is this a bug? I updated QGIS dev this morning using the OSGeo4W installer (its revision is eb9ce3a). If you are creating postgis layers in a loop, are you making sure to destroy them again nicely in your loop? Anyway if it used to work before maybe there was a regression somewhere Regards Tim James Stott GIS-koordinator Administrasjonsavdelinga Fylkesmannen i Rogaland Telefon: 51568793 james.st...@fylkesmannen.nomailto:james.st...@fylkesmannen.no http://www.temakart-rogaland.no ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.orgmailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member == Please do not email me off-list with technical support questions. Using the lists will gain more exposure for your issues and the knowledge surrounding your issue will be shared with all. Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.nethttp://freenode.net
Re: [Qgis-developer] Requesting bug fix extension through weekend
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 07:37:10PM +0100, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: But to quote Tim: We're not going anywhere. There will still be bugs in QGIS 2.3 to work on after the release. And I trust that you're not going to stop bug fixing just because the fixes don't make it into 2.2. How about encoding such trust in an official 2.2.x branch to be used as a maintainance branch from which to ship 2.2.1 after n days of inactivity following last bugfix commit since previous release ? I'm sure more bugs will be reported once 2.2.0 is officially out so those n days of silence might take a few weeks too :) --strk; () ASCII ribbon campaign -- Keep it simple ! /\ http://strk.keybit.net/rants/ascii_mails.txt ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Issue with standalone python script and PostGIS Layers
On 21-02-14 10:53, Stott, James wrote: Just a follow up to this if other people ever have trouble with this. I have managed to load my query layers by specifying False for the loadDefaultStyleFlag parameter when I create the QgsVectorLayer. So ... It would be good to get details about this parameter added to http://www.qgis.org/en/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/loadlayer.html Is this something I can add myself? Sure: sources of the python cookbook live here: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/blob/master/source/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/loadlayer.rst You can fork QGIS-Documentation project and do a Pull Request (preferably) but if that is too much work (or beyond your git foo), just write down some paragraph of text and sent it to the community list very small font or me /very small font? Building the docs itself is currently only working on Linux (not 100% sure). Regards, Richard ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Requesting bug fix extension through weekend
I, my customers and without a doubt: Several thousands of ordinary users of QGIS would simply _love_ the idea of having a stable branch which is only updated with bugfixes. The problem with using QGS - weekly is that you get the bugfixes, but also a lot of new - very untested - technology. This gets the ordinary users stuck between a rock and a hard place. Regards Bo Victor Thomsen Aestas-GIS Denmark Den 21-02-2014 10:58, Sandro Santilli skrev: On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 07:37:10PM +0100, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: But to quote Tim: We're not going anywhere. There will still be bugs in QGIS 2.3 to work on after the release. And I trust that you're not going to stop bug fixing just because the fixes don't make it into 2.2. How about encoding such trust in an official 2.2.x branch to be used as a maintainance branch from which to ship 2.2.1 after n days of inactivity following last bugfix commit since previous release ? I'm sure more bugs will be reported once 2.2.0 is officially out so those n days of silence might take a few weeks too :) --strk; () ASCII ribbon campaign -- Keep it simple ! /\ http://strk.keybit.net/rants/ascii_mails.txt ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Requesting bug fix extension through weekend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 21/02/2014 11:35, Bo Victor Thomsen ha scritto: I, my customers and without a doubt: Several thousands of ordinary users of QGIS would simply _love_ the idea of having a stable branch which is only updated with bugfixes. The problem with using QGS - weekly is that you get the bugfixes, but also a lot of new - very untested - technology. This gets the ordinary users stuck between a rock and a hard place. Everybody would love this. If someone finds the resources to do it, we'll all be happy. All the best. - -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlMHLzUACgkQ/NedwLUzIr47kwCghO+P7/PNqjkbA+trneKUTj48 XcUAn3jfkthliafKHjv33vAyRlQAc0wb =OgXc -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Requesting bug fix extension through weekend
What kind of resources are we talking about ? Maintainer duties, developer resources, Sponsor money ? And how much ? I might possibly be able to get some of my customers to cough up some cash for a stable branch. Regards Bo Victor Den 21-02-2014 11:49, Paolo Cavallini skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 21/02/2014 11:35, Bo Victor Thomsen ha scritto: I, my customers and without a doubt: Several thousands of ordinary users of QGIS would simply _love_ the idea of having a stable branch which is only updated with bugfixes. The problem with using QGS - weekly is that you get the bugfixes, but also a lot of new - very untested - technology. This gets the ordinary users stuck between a rock and a hard place. Everybody would love this. If someone finds the resources to do it, we'll all be happy. All the best. - -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlMHLzUACgkQ/NedwLUzIr47kwCghO+P7/PNqjkbA+trneKUTj48 XcUAn3jfkthliafKHjv33vAyRlQAc0wb =OgXc -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Requesting bug fix extension through weekend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 21/02/2014 12:32, Bo Victor Thomsen ha scritto: What kind of resources are we talking about ? Maintainer duties, developer resources, Sponsor money ? And how much ? I might possibly be able to get some of my customers to cough up some cash for a stable branch. That's good news! Either developer time or money would do. An estimate will strongly depend on who could take care of it. All the best, and thanks. - -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlMHOtgACgkQ/NedwLUzIr7gNgCgsGTFLqO6H0eNov76RkBs15ma BqAAn0vExtcLq73pIV9nFAvXzA9ORitu =J4y6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Requesting bug fix extension through weekend
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:39:04PM +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote: Il 21/02/2014 12:32, Bo Victor Thomsen ha scritto: What kind of resources are we talking about ? Maintainer duties, developer resources, Sponsor money ? And how much ? I might possibly be able to get some of my customers to cough up some cash for a stable branch. That's good news! Either developer time or money would do. An estimate will strongly depend on who could take care of it. Just to add some background info about taking care of a stable branch: There have been 14 commits between tags final-2_0_0 and final-2_0_1. The download page makes you download 2.0.1. There are 42 commits between tag final-2_0_1 and current tip of the release-2_0 branch, but no final 2.0.2 release exists. Latest commit in the branch was on Mon Feb 3 15:25:35 2014 +0100, that is 18 days ago (2.5 weeks). I think taking care of stable releases would be first of all setting some rules about when a new stable release is due. I think this would be the duty of the release manager. My proposal was to cut a new release after some days (or weeks) of inactivity since last commit. For example if it is after 2 weeks, we would be ready to cut a 2.0.2 right now. Once rules are setup, we'd need: 1. Someone to execute the cutting rule (ie: go throught the process of closing a final version when it is due). 2. Someone to guard after what activity is allowed or not allowed in the stable branch. 3. Any number of developers backporting bugfixes to the stable branch. The first task could be delivered on-demand. The second task would be best covered by a maintainer role. The third task could be taken care of by anyone. --strk; ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] When is 2.2 really due?
Hi, Maybe I did not follow all discussion. But I see people posting tweets and blogs everywhere that QGIS 2.2 will be available in 24h or something similar. Is this really true? Don't we require a couple of days for packaging, testing that the binaries really work, etc.? I am just a bit worried that people put out false promises and increased pressure on the release manager, making people believe that they can install QGIS 2.2. Monday morning ... Sorry if I don't know all the details - this is more a question than a comment as I am not totally aware of what tasks are required to do the releases. Andreas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] When is 2.2 really due?
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:17:23PM +, Andreas Neumann wrote: Hi, Maybe I did not follow all discussion. But I see people posting tweets and blogs everywhere that QGIS 2.2 will be available in 24h or something similar. Is this really true? Don't we require a couple of days for packaging, testing that the binaries really work, etc.? I am just a bit worried that people put out false promises and increased pressure on the release manager, making people believe that they can install QGIS 2.2. Monday morning ... Well, I think it's a matter of perception. It would take a simple git tag for me to be able to install QGIS 2.2.0. For somebody else it'd take a .deb or .rpm or .exe package instead. The way I see it, a release should be considered published as soon as a versioned tarball with the source code is made available somewhere on the internet. It may be a good habit, in the future, to tag release candidates for packagers to test them before going final. --strk; ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Requesting bug fix extension through weekend
I'm going on holiday for the next week. Maybe we kan discuss this subject further after my holiday. And for others on list - sorry for the noise Regards Bo Victor Thomsen Den 21-02-2014 12:59, Sandro Santilli skrev: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:39:04PM +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote: Il 21/02/2014 12:32, Bo Victor Thomsen ha scritto: What kind of resources are we talking about ? Maintainer duties, developer resources, Sponsor money ? And how much ? I might possibly be able to get some of my customers to cough up some cash for a stable branch. That's good news! Either developer time or money would do. An estimate will strongly depend on who could take care of it. Just to add some background info about taking care of a stable branch: There have been 14 commits between tags final-2_0_0 and final-2_0_1. The download page makes you download 2.0.1. There are 42 commits between tag final-2_0_1 and current tip of the release-2_0 branch, but no final 2.0.2 release exists. Latest commit in the branch was on Mon Feb 3 15:25:35 2014 +0100, that is 18 days ago (2.5 weeks). I think taking care of stable releases would be first of all setting some rules about when a new stable release is due. I think this would be the duty of the release manager. My proposal was to cut a new release after some days (or weeks) of inactivity since last commit. For example if it is after 2 weeks, we would be ready to cut a 2.0.2 right now. Once rules are setup, we'd need: 1. Someone to execute the cutting rule (ie: go throught the process of closing a final version when it is due). 2. Someone to guard after what activity is allowed or not allowed in the stable branch. 3. Any number of developers backporting bugfixes to the stable branch. The first task could be delivered on-demand. The second task would be best covered by a maintainer role. The third task could be taken care of by anyone. --strk; ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Plugin [464] MetaSearch Catalogue Client approval notification.
Plugin MetaSearch Catalogue Client approval by rduivenvoorde. The plugin version [464] MetaSearch Catalogue Client 0.1.0 is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/MetaSearch/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Which compiler for a c++ QGIS custom app
Hi all, I am a bit lost at trying to build a custom QGIS app on a windows 7. I have installed QGIS libs, Qt libs and minGW using osgeo4w installer (thanks to Nathan's advices). I have also installed Qt Creator 3.0. Now in creator, I have configured Qt version as Qt 4.7. using c:\osgeo4w\bin\qmake.exe. But I can't manage to find the right compiler to use for this version. With all the compilers I tried, it says none of the compiler can produce code for this version of Qt. Does someone know which compiler to use? Can't I use one embedded in osgeo package? PS: I don't have visual studio installed, and I would like to avoid installing it. Thanks a lot, Denis ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] When is 2.2 really due?
Hi Andreas, On Fri, 21. Feb 2014 at 12:17:23 +, Andreas Neumann wrote: Maybe I did not follow all discussion. But I see people posting tweets and blogs everywhere that QGIS 2.2 will be available in 24h or something similar. Is this really true? Don't we require a couple of days for packaging, testing that the binaries really work, etc.? Yes. That's what we had the freeze period for. But we're going to release only the sources today (which still lasts 18h in Alaska) and call for packages after that. I am just a bit worried that people put out false promises and increased pressure on the release manager, making people believe that they can install QGIS 2.2. Monday morning ... The release manager is blocking people from continuing their bug fixing work after having blocked them to doing their feature work already. Releasing just the sources on the release date will probably just put pressure on the packagers to get packages out asap. But there's no set date when that needs to happen. But Monday is hopefully not far off. Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de QGIS PSC member (RM) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode -- norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502 ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] When is 2.2 really due?
Hi Jürgen, Thanks for the clarification. Maybe in the future we could also test binary packages before we officially release QGIS. After all this is what people use out their. If packages are broken (even if QGIS from source is fine) this will be bad for QGIS reputation. 95% of the QGIS users will judge QGIS after the quality of the package they install. They would not install from source. I guess any company with a product would do that. I know, we are a project and not a company, but I think from a QA perspective we should really also test packages before releasing stuff. At least for the most common OS, like Win64, latest OSX, latest Ubuntu/Debian. Anyway - thanks for all the work to all the devs and to you as release manager! Andreas Am 21.02.2014 15:17, schrieb Jürgen E. Fischer: Hi Andreas, On Fri, 21. Feb 2014 at 12:17:23 +, Andreas Neumann wrote: Maybe I did not follow all discussion. But I see people posting tweets and blogs everywhere that QGIS 2.2 will be available in 24h or something similar. Is this really true? Don't we require a couple of days for packaging, testing that the binaries really work, etc.? Yes. That's what we had the freeze period for. But we're going to release only the sources today (which still lasts 18h in Alaska) and call for packages after that. I am just a bit worried that people put out false promises and increased pressure on the release manager, making people believe that they can install QGIS 2.2. Monday morning ... The release manager is blocking people from continuing their bug fixing work after having blocked them to doing their feature work already. Releasing just the sources on the release date will probably just put pressure on the packagers to get packages out asap. But there's no set date when that needs to happen. But Monday is hopefully not far off. Jürgen ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Which compiler for a c++ QGIS custom app
Hi Denis, On Fri, 21. Feb 2014 at 15:20:19 +0100, Denis Rouzaud wrote: I have installed QGIS libs, Qt libs and minGW using osgeo4w installer (thanks to Nathan's advices). mingw using the osgeo4w installer? That might be there for GRASS. But QGIS and Qt in OSGeo4W is built with Visual C++ not MinGW. You can't use OSGeo4W's Qt with MinGW. Does someone know which compiler to use? Can't I use one embedded in osgeo package? PS: I don't have visual studio installed, and I would like to avoid installing it. Sorry, I didn't do that for years - should also be possible, but I suppose it takes some work. Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de QGIS PSC member (RM) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode -- norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502 ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] When is 2.2 really due?
Hi Andreas, On Fri, 21. Feb 2014 at 15:30:45 +, Andreas Neumann wrote: Maybe in the future we could also test binary packages before we officially release QGIS. After all this is what people use out their. If packages are broken (even if QGIS from source is fine) this will be bad for QGIS reputation. 95% of the QGIS users will judge QGIS after the quality of the package they install. They would not install from source. That's what the test period is for - the differences there are minor (at least for Windows and the debian/ubuntu packages). But a lot of people will always wait for the release before they start to test and find stuff that no one ran into while testing - of course some of those could be found in a separate package testing phase (and with a extensive test suite), but packaging problems can also be handled outside of the qgis release schedule. I guess any company with a product would do that. I know, we are a project and not a company, but I think from a QA perspective we should really also test packages before releasing stuff. At least for the most common OS, like Win64, latest OSX, latest Ubuntu/Debian. As the packaging is now outside of qgis (and IMHO is was that way earlier - eg. bugs in the OSGeo4W packages should be filed there - but the standalone installer from repackaged OSGeo4W packages is a gray area). For Windows there's already some threshold - I'll first put the new release into OSGeo4W and produce a standalone installer some time later... Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de QGIS PSC member (RM) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode -- norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502 ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Which compiler for a c++ QGIS custom app
Hi Jürgen, Thanks a lot for your reply. It seems I should finally use Visual C++. I will give it a try this weekend! Thanks again and happy release ;) Denis On 21 Feb 2014, at 16:24, Jürgen E. Fischer j...@norbit.de wrote: Hi Denis, On Fri, 21. Feb 2014 at 15:20:19 +0100, Denis Rouzaud wrote: I have installed QGIS libs, Qt libs and minGW using osgeo4w installer (thanks to Nathan's advices). mingw using the osgeo4w installer? That might be there for GRASS. But QGIS and Qt in OSGeo4W is built with Visual C++ not MinGW. You can't use OSGeo4W's Qt with MinGW. Does someone know which compiler to use? Can't I use one embedded in osgeo package? PS: I don't have visual studio installed, and I would like to avoid installing it. Sorry, I didn't do that for years - should also be possible, but I suppose it takes some work. Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de QGIS PSC member (RM) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode -- norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502 ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] When is 2.2 really due?
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 05:13:59PM +0100, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: But a lot of people will always wait for the release before they start to test and find stuff that no one ran into while testing - of course some of those could be found in a separate package testing phase (and with a extensive test suite), but packaging problems can also be handled outside of the qgis release schedule. That's why maintaining a stable branch is important: there'll always be a lot more testing after a release is out. You can't beat thousand of users with any automated tests... :) --strk; () ASCII ribbon campaign -- Keep it simple ! /\ http://strk.keybit.net/rants/ascii_mails.txt ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Run Dissolve with selected features
Greetings Devs,
I have a large number of shapefiles I need to process and have had limited
success using QGis 2.0.1 with it's python console.
// This works -
from osgeo import ogr
canvas =
qgis.utils.iface.mapCanvas()
allLayers = canvas.layers()
for i in allLayers: i.selectAll(); print i.name(); print
i.selectedFeatureCount()
// What I can't figure out is how to throw in a selection and then run Dissove
on it.
I've tried
for i in allLayers: i.selectAll(); print i.name();
i.getFeatures(QgsFeatureRequest().QgsExpression('LWFLAG P '); print
i.selectedFeatureCount()andselExp = QgsExpression('LWFLAG P ')for i in
allLayers: i.selectAll(); print i.name();
i.getFeatures(QgsFeatureRequest(selExp); print i.selectedFeatureCount()
andfor i in allLayers: i.selectAll(); print i.name();
i.getFeatures(QgsFeatureRequest('LWFLAG P ')); print
i.selectedFeatureCount()
and several other techniques all to no avail.
In PseudoCode:
from osgeo import ogrcanvas = qgis.utils.iface.mapCanvas()allLayers =
canvas.layers()for i in allLayers: i.select('LWFLAG P ');
print i.name(); print i.selectedFeatureCount(); i.dissolve(use
sel, i.name() + '_dis', BLOCKGRP);
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Plugin [466] qgisio approval notification.
Plugin qgisio approval by pka. The plugin version [466] qgisio 0.1 Experimental is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/qgisio/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
